Yes the FT was funny I still really think the sat structure needs drastically changing. 1 in 10 sats are fine if there's an abundance of players but sky doesn't have so many. A lot of people play 1 or 2 sats and fail and don't have the roll nor inclination to keep trying which is why there are less and less players qualifying for the finals,
I really think that as well as the 1in10 sats there could be 1in5 or 1in6 running alongside. So 1100 / 220 / 60 / 17. It adds another stage to qualify but instead of 9-1 x 9-1 x 9-1 = 729-1 it's 4-1 x 4-1 x 4-1 x 4-1 = 256-1. It also allows for more people to progress through more stages which would give them hope instead of always being against a 9-1 brick wall.
Just some thoughts.
PS..... someone needs to check my sums as the odds of making it to the final seem rather skewed????
Comments
I still really think the sat structure needs drastically changing. 1 in 10 sats are fine if there's an abundance of players but sky doesn't have so many. A lot of people play 1 or 2 sats and fail and don't have the roll nor inclination to keep trying which is why there are less and less players qualifying for the finals,
I really think that as well as the 1in10 sats there could be 1in5 or 1in6 running alongside. So 1100 / 220 / 60 / 17. It adds another stage to qualify but instead of 9-1 x 9-1 x 9-1 = 729-1 it's 4-1 x 4-1 x 4-1 x 4-1 = 256-1. It also allows for more people to progress through more stages which would give them hope instead of always being against a 9-1 brick wall.
Just some thoughts.
PS..... someone needs to check my sums as the odds of making it to the final seem rather skewed????