You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

DYM question

dantb10dantb10 Member Posts: 583
edited April 2015 in Poker Chat
did anyone ever find out what would happen if every player went all in on the first hand of a double your money?

Say one person won, what dictates who cashes out of the other 5?

P.S im very bored avoiding doing actual work!!
«13456713

Comments

  • acebarry10acebarry10 Member Posts: 7,556
    edited June 2010
    In Response to DYM question:
    did anyone ever find out what would happen if every player went all in on the first hand of a double your money? Say one person won, what dictates who cashes out of the other 5? P.S im very bored avoiding doing actual work!!
    Posted by dantb10
    Hi m8

    I beleive they did try it, but had a player in the game that didnt know what was going on, they tried again, and think they got an answer, but were on about tryng again at some point (cant remember outcome sigh)
  • dantb10dantb10 Member Posts: 583
    edited June 2010
    In Response to Re: DYM question:
    In Response to DYM question : Hi m8 I beleive they did try it, but had a player in the game that didnt know what was going on, they tried again, and think they got an answer, but were on about tryng again at some point (cant remember outcome sigh)
    Posted by acebarry10
    lol, cheers baz!
  • Donut64Donut64 Member Posts: 2,666
    edited June 2010
    The only way it could be resoved is if the 3 best hands won the money! But in reallity that should never arise as if their are 4 already all-in the last 2 are never going to call even with big slick.
  • MereNoviceMereNovice Member Posts: 4,364
    edited June 2010
    I'm really glad that you brought this up Dan. I feel that it's very important.

    The people who get their money in last get paid.
    This just goes to show that it's not always best to get your money in first.   :-)

    For details of the remarkable scientific endeavour used to prove this see here.




    Note: I have edited this post because I was 100% wrong in my intial post!
  • Donut64Donut64 Member Posts: 2,666
    edited June 2010
    Im not often right and Im wrong again! :)
  • MAXALLYMAXALLY Member Posts: 17,640
    edited June 2010

    I nominate DANTB10/DOHHHHH/PHIL12UK/OZZIE/DYLAN12/TIKAY10......to 'try it' in a £110 DYM and post the results on here for everyone to view the experiment....  :) ) ) ) )


    GL 
  • DiggerManDiggerMan Member Posts: 1,027
    edited June 2010
    The experiment MUST be tried again!!!!

    Scientific and mathematical theories are still dangling in the air and need to be resolved!!!
  • MachkaMachka Member Posts: 4,627
    edited June 2010
    I'm about to redo the experiment?
  • MachkaMachka Member Posts: 4,627
    edited June 2010
    That was badly worded.  I am about, if anyone else wants to try and redo the experiment this afternoon?
  • LMLLML Member Posts: 1,708
    edited June 2010
    Yes yes.. I was involved in this.. It was VERY scientific and stuff.

    As Vince says.. the last 2 people to get there chips in got paid as well as the winner of the hand.

    Obviously as a test case we should try this on a £100 DYM as well as our little 30p one.. ANY TAKERS????


    Ps.. Just reread the old thread and it made me giggle! Poor Bland! Haven't seen him since.. He must still be wondering aroundin Area 51 lol
  • dantb10dantb10 Member Posts: 583
    edited June 2010
    I dare try it!
  • MachkaMachka Member Posts: 4,627
    edited June 2010
    That only proved that when 5 people go all in the winner, the person who didn't play along and the player who had their money in last won.

    It has not be shown that when all 6 players go all in the last to get their money in win.

    Can I suggest we do this on a Turbo DYM, so it doesn't take so long?

    ;-)
  • LMLLML Member Posts: 1,708
    edited June 2010
    Shall we try it again.. at 2pm.. on a 30p 6 seat DYM and make sure it's NLH (I managed rather cleverly to open a PL last time and had no idea why I couldn't All-in!)
  • 35suited35suited Member Posts: 2,332
    edited June 2010
    depedning on the level im here to try it
  • phil12ukphil12uk Member Posts: 2,856
    edited June 2010
    I'll do any level ;) need 5 other takers though?

    The £100 DYMs won't fill up as quick as the 30p ones so u wont get a Bland player sitting in.

    Looking at Mere's link, Id never seen the experiment before.  What was my TP play that was mentioned?
  • LMLLML Member Posts: 1,708
    edited June 2010
    In Response to Re: DYM question:
    That only proved that when 5 people go all in the winner, the person who didn't play along and the player who had their money in last won. It has not be shown that when all 6 players go all in the last to get their money in win. Can I suggest we do this on a Turbo DYM, so it doesn't take so long? ;-)
    Posted by Machka

    PS We did have the final payout table too.. Don't know what happened to it :(

    Ah.. I'm feeling all nostalgic!

    2PM? Phase II

    Who's in..

    Me
    Machka
    DanTB
    Luckbox
    Gareth
  • MachkaMachka Member Posts: 4,627
    edited June 2010
    lol, I'm in, well not yet, but I will be at 2pm.  LM you find a table then if we look for you at 2pm we should get in before anybody wanders in and is bemused by the whole situation.  This is assuming it's not just You, Dan and myself playing along!
  • dantb10dantb10 Member Posts: 583
    edited June 2010
    yes im in!
  • phil12ukphil12uk Member Posts: 2,856
    edited June 2010
    In Response to Re: DYM question:
    In Response to Re: DYM question : PS We did have the final payout table too.. Don't know what happened to it :( Ah.. I'm feeling all nostalgic! 2PM? Phase II Who's in.. Me Machka DanTB Luckbox Gareth
    Posted by LML
    Am I to presume this is me??
  • LMLLML Member Posts: 1,708
    edited June 2010
    I'll just go for the 2nd empty 30p.. (Guessing others will hit the first one)

    So lets try and all get in together at 2pm on the dot! My watch currently at 1.52

Sign In or Register to comment.