deuceslive has it right...bit surprised he is the only one who has. it was a poorly phrased sentence but at no point do i say dylan posts a load of nonsense. what i wanted to avoid (although ultimately it happened anyway) was finding a load of players who will just stick up for his play regardless of the situation. if this has been interpreted incorrectly i apologise. obviously as has been pointed out in the thread i dont post often on the forums (probably will remain that way) so i didnt realise it was frowned upon to post the name of the player in the hand. as you can see from my original post i didnt even think the hand had copied across correctly so unlikely i would spend any time crossing out an opponents name. thank you for all the genuine comments on the hand. Posted by huuuuume
In Response to Re: the £22 bounty hunter...is king high ever good here? : OP was not reasonable by a) mentioning villains name and then criticising his play, and b) saying he posts a lot of nonsense (which is not true imo) If a guy calls me here, i do appreciate the call, and i am happy because i got my money in ahead. If he hits the river, so be it, suck it up and move on to the next game. Posted by GREGHOGG
This post sums it up... crazy calls suck out on river ur ahead when chips went in what more can u do.
this is a bit harsh to Dylan, lets give him credit for leading the turn in order to induce you to check shove all those hands he has locked... KQ is a snap call here, It was just a total cooler that u had 2nd pair!
U basically got owned and if the river bricked you wouldnt have deserved the pot.
Comments
U basically got owned and if the river bricked you wouldnt have deserved the pot.