You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
Player | Action | Cards | Amount | Pot | Balance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
the_gibb | Small blind | 75.00 | 75.00 | 5550.00 | |
SHANXTA | Big blind | 150.00 | 225.00 | 7035.00 | |
Your hole cards |
| ||||
TheyDontNo | Fold | ||||
Villain | Raise | 450.00 | 675.00 | 6230.00 | |
NIHIGHGUN | Fold | ||||
phil12uk | Fold | ||||
the_gibb | Fold | ||||
SHANXTA | Raise | 1350.00 | 2025.00 | 5685.00 | |
Villain | Raise | 5250.00 | 7275.00 | 980.00 | |
SHANXTA | Fold | ||||
Villain | Muck | ||||
Villain | Win | 3075.00 | 4055.00 | ||
Villain | Return | 4200.00 | 0.00 | 8255.00 |
Comments
Villain - 6800
I suspect the lack of replies is coz its such a tough situation, and no1 really knows what to do....
I've looked at it twice and not been able to come up with anything constructive, but ill bump it to say im clueless....
It's all about the oppo here - i dunno about deepstack strategy, what's his opinion of you? Does he have you down as a creative player? - does he know you that well? - If it were me I could 4 bet shove against you with a wider range, knowing that your 3 bet range can also be pretty wide....but u describe him as abc and solid, so maybe u have to give him credit here
Be good to get replies from penguin, scotty and even tk on this - the top mtt players....
I think in this structure there's loads of play early, but upto and around the bubble, it quickly becomes shove/fold, so maybe gambling with AK early isnt a bad move, as the structure isnt that slow.....
Table image is crucial in this decision, yours and his, I would be shoving against some opponents.
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 39.785% 23.66% 16.13% 10936805 7456889.50 { AdKs }
Hand 1: 60.215% 44.09% 16.13% 20381624 7456889.50 { JJ+, AKs, AKo }
So I definitely wouldn't be 3-bet/folding here w/o some specific reads, also I think this 3 bet size is better than 3 bet shoving (I would probably even 3-bet a bit smaller) as by shoving we fold out any bluffs/weaker aces that he may continue with if he thinks he still has fold equity, and it balances the other times when we are 3-bet bluffing and don't want to be pot committed.
Does the equity v oppos range still apply in mtts then?
Surely not, as u have 1 life.....whereas in cash u have as many as u like.
Surely it's even more important to get every single decision spot on? Therefore u need to put him on "A HAND" or at least a very specific range? - when there is play ofc, not at shove/fold time.
Im no mtt specialist, but once I go deep (not bothered in the first hour, gamble/bust) - Im counting every chip and very protective of my stack, you gotta be in it to win it.
I see some unbelievable folds in mtt's from like the main event and stuff - which ud never in a million years see in a cash game.
Ye but surely a more successful mtt player is going to be the one who makes the right decision in each specific situation more often than not - as opposed to a player who has a winning game over time.
Even more so in tournaments, its this instinct and feel, making hero calls and amazing folds to avoid tourny bullets, - that seperates the best from the rest.
I have qualified for this tourny at the end of the month, £220 buy in, which is wayyyyyyyyy more than I'd ever dream of paying for an mtt, I don't even play primo - and my approach in this is going to be to try and get every single decision right - wether thats right or wrong, Im sure it will improve my performance for this 1 specific tourny - coz at the time what else matters?
If I can get away from KK pre flop and the guy has AA, it's a great fold - Idnt care if people say it's a losing fold over time, I'm not playing over time, im playing this game right here right now - and i'll trust myself to get it right 1 way or the other.
Having said this - I'm still unsure as to what I'd do in the above hand, as I'd need to know who the villain is.
Have always done better in MTT then cash for it aswell
For example just say someone shoves all-in on the river and you have the 2nd nuts, and in your opinion he has the nuts about 20% of the time based on the range you put him on, its the correct play to make the call 100% of the time, no matter what the result of that 1 particular hand is.
How about if you can make the call 80 times when you are ahead, and fold the 20 times when he has the nuts.
Pefection?
........Is this possible?
More realistically, 'over time' - make the call 900,000 times, including the 800,000 times you have him beat, and 100,000 times when you are behind - hence saving 100,000 tournaments.
Again, if it is possible to make the perfect decision every single time, then why not aim to do so?