You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Full house Vs Royal Flush

cobbler78cobbler78 Member Posts: 65
edited November 2010 in The Poker Clinic
I lost and to be honest, dont mind losing to a royal flush, I think I played this hand pretty well, though I was up against a big flush but was well aware there could be a royal flush out there after the river. But I think I had to call the all in bet. Thoughts??

Hand History #306710756 (22:53 10/11/2010)

PlayerActionCardsAmountPotBalance
Jolew Small blind  15.00 15.00 2295.00
pokeynose Big blind  30.00 45.00 2080.00
  Your hole cards
  • K
  • 9
     
GEE1987 Call  30.00 75.00 2320.00
jacksht Call  30.00 105.00 1940.00
different Fold     
cobbler78 Call  30.00 135.00 1730.00
Jolew Call  15.00 150.00 2280.00
pokeynose Check     
Flop
   
  • K
  • K
  • 10
     
Jolew Check     
pokeynose Check     
GEE1987 Bet  60.00 210.00 2260.00
jacksht Call  60.00 270.00 1880.00
cobbler78 Raise  180.00 450.00 1550.00
Jolew Call  180.00 630.00 2100.00
pokeynose Call  180.00 810.00 1900.00
GEE1987 Fold     
jacksht Fold     
Turn
   
  • 9
     
Jolew Check     
pokeynose Check     
cobbler78 Bet  60.00 870.00 1490.00
Jolew Call  60.00 930.00 2040.00
pokeynose Call  60.00 990.00 1840.00
River
   
  • A
     
Jolew Check     
pokeynose Check     
cobbler78 Bet  180.00 1170.00 1310.00
Jolew All-in  2040.00 3210.00 0.00
pokeynose Fold     
cobbler78 All-in  1310.00 4520.00 0.00
Jolew Unmatched bet  550.00 3970.00 550.00
Jolew Show
  • J
  • Q
   
cobbler78 Show
  • K
  • 9
   
Jolew Win Royal Flush 3970.00  4520.00

Comments

  • The_Don90The_Don90 Member Posts: 9,814
    edited November 2010
    only thing id say raise or fold pre.
  • cobbler78cobbler78 Member Posts: 65
    edited November 2010

    Maybe, but I was on the button and getting good odds to call pre. Lucky I wasnt playing a cash game I suppose, that coul have cost me my whole stack.

  • thorpey1thorpey1 Member Posts: 165
    edited November 2010
    just one of those things very unlucky i couldnt lay it down tbh never had a royal flush 
  • PILLOWMANPILLOWMAN Member Posts: 1,165
    edited November 2010
    In Response to Re: Full house Vs Royal Flush:
    just one of those things very unlucky i couldnt lay it down tbh never had a royal flush 
    Posted by thorpey1

     
     WE COULD BE FRIENDS IF YOU DO:)



      PS,I MISS CANDY
  • ybyb Member Posts: 1,471
    edited November 2010
    Played pretty terribly tbh.

    Fold or raise pre (preferably fold).
    Raise more on flop.
    Bet more on turn & river.

    You should easily have been able to get stacks in so not sure how you managed to leave yourself with 1310 chips out of 1730.
  • cobbler78cobbler78 Member Posts: 65
    edited November 2010
    I had the house early though, didnt want to scare people off, i wanted people to get their flush draws. Only put 30 in pre to a pot of 150 on the button with an average hand. If i hit like i did massive implied odds in my favour.
  • ybyb Member Posts: 1,471
    edited November 2010
    You do not have implied odds with this hand. In fact you have reverse implied odds because I doubt you'd be folding it too easily if you hit top pair. You are going to flop trips and turn a house with it hardly ever. K9o is a junky hand, just throw it away.

    Also anyone calling with a flush draw on the flop got there on the turn, then you decide to bet 60 into a pot of 810 for some reason meaning that we cannot get stacks in with a psb on river. Obv when we have a fh this is not a good thing.
  • YOUNG_GUNYOUNG_GUN Member Posts: 8,948
    edited November 2010
    In Response to Re: Full house Vs Royal Flush:
    Played pretty terribly tbh. Fold or raise pre (preferably fold). Raise more on flop. Bet more on turn & river. You should easily have been able to get stacks in so not sure how you managed to leave yourself with 1310 chips out of 1730.
    Posted by yb

    This dont think you played it well at all
  • pryce6pryce6 Member Posts: 1,058
    edited November 2010
    Lol this isn't the poker clinic?
  • shelskishelski Member Posts: 467
    edited November 2010
    In Response to Re: Full house Vs Royal Flush:
    Lol this isn't the poker clinic?
    Posted by pryce6
    That pryce6 guy is ALWAYS right !
  • The_Don90The_Don90 Member Posts: 9,814
    edited November 2010
    eeek i just noticed u where dead off turn lol .
  • luvBWFCluvBWFC Member Posts: 763
    edited November 2010
    I watched quads lose to a str8 flush yesterday. That has to suck for the quads.
  • KevilfishKevilfish Member Posts: 354
    edited November 2010
    I don't mind the limp on the button, you're in position after the flop, it's only 1.7% of your stack, it doesn't really matter what your cards are as long as you were willing to use your position after the flop.

    On the flop, I'd be raising much more, it's a dangerous drawing board, I'd be making it 450-600.

    When the turn comes, take away the end result, it's the perfect card for you, the open-ended straight has hit, the flush has hit and you have a full house, you have two opponents, you've got to get value here, it doesn't matter if one in two times you scare away your opponents, if you can get all of your chips in the middle one in every two times, you'll benefit in the long term.
    If the raise was bigger on the flop, you could push your 1200 into 1600, you're probably getting at least one of the players calling, possibly two.
    I can understand the 60 bet if you have a read that your opponents are good players and are likely to be raising your weak bet but I prefer the bigger bet, maybe 300-450.

    Again on the river, I would have bet bigger.

    You were always going to lose your stack here, one tip here is don't be afraid of scaring away your opponents, it's better to win a few small pots as well as a few massive pots, rather than a lot of average sized pots.
Sign In or Register to comment.