In Response to Re: Tournament bankroll management? : I think that would depend on the STANDARD of tournys you intend to enter,xxx Posted by debdobs_67
agreed for sure
if you're entering regularly the MEs or other high buyin, high runner tournaments- you need a lot of buyins. I don't think you need anywhere near as many if you're playing the lower stake BHs (even the 11 9.30 is a fairly safe bet as tournaments go).
Provided you feel confident enough in your game, at lower stakes, 30 buyins should be ample (IMO). If you play the BHs, 20 would probably do since you'll get at least your entrance fee back in a huge amount of them. But if you play MEs on sky, 50+? I think the game on sky is still soft enough that a br of 1000 playing MEs only would hold itself afloat.
it depends of course on your tolerance of risk. If you are playing for fun and can tolerate say a 5-10% chance of going bust then 30 buyins would be fine. If you treat your bankroll as your livelihood then you shouldnt tolerate the same level of risk.
Incidentally I can recommend a book called Fortune's Formula by William Poundstone that covers this topic in a very entertaining way. I heard Phil Laak talk about it on TV and that was good enough for me. If you start with a gambling proposition in which you have a known edge, Kelly's Criterion can be used to calculate the proportion of your bankroll you should risk in each game
Comments
if you're entering regularly the MEs or other high buyin, high runner tournaments- you need a lot of buyins. I don't think you need anywhere near as many if you're playing the lower stake BHs (even the 11 9.30 is a fairly safe bet as tournaments go).
Provided you feel confident enough in your game, at lower stakes, 30 buyins should be ample (IMO). If you play the BHs, 20 would probably do since you'll get at least your entrance fee back in a huge amount of them. But if you play MEs on sky, 50+? I think the game on sky is still soft enough that a br of 1000 playing MEs only would hold itself afloat.
Incidentally I can recommend a book called Fortune's Formula by William Poundstone that covers this topic in a very entertaining way. I heard Phil Laak talk about it on TV and that was good enough for me.
If you start with a gambling proposition in which you have a known edge, Kelly's Criterion can be used to calculate the proportion of your bankroll you should risk in each game