You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
DYM Entry Fee | Old League Points | New League Points |
Less than £1.10 | 1st 4 points - 2nd 3 points | 1st, 2nd & 3rd = 3 points each |
Between £1.10 - £5.50 | 1st 8 points - 2nd 6 points | 1st, 2nd & 3rd = 7 points each |
Greater than £5.50 | 1st 12 points - 2nd 9 points | 1st, 2nd & 3rd = 10 points each |
Comments
Just wondering if there are any plans to end the DYM game automatically after three people have cashed? This has also been raised many times before.
Ending the game at this point would be great for people that multi table the games, and on many other sites, the game ends at this point. Also gives people more time to set up other games so will benefit Sky too.
Cheers
P.S ending satelite mtts when all seats are won is also another good change that could be brought in imo.
When Greg's suggestion is implemented too the DYM tables will be set up perfectly.
I'd just like to say that I think that it is a shame; not least because people have campaigned for it when it is of no benefit to them and a loss to others.
People who want to leave the table can close it down (or minimise it if becomes active again) - they are under no obligation to play on. This is a VERY minor inconvenience.
I played a micro-stakes PLO DYM game this morning with two people who were clearly fairly new to the game. After three fairly early casualties, they wanted to play on "properly". They had paid their money and were entitled to a game in my opinion.
Closing the tables after three people are out deprives those people of this opportunity.
A few months ago I felt my HU game wasn't up to sctratch when I made it to MTT final tables, so I took the time to play a couple of hundred matches on HU SnG tables spread over a few weeks. My HU game definitely improved. The last place I would have chosen to practise would be in DYMs.
The game is what you make of it.
Not everyone needs money at stake to play poker to the best of their ability.
I have recently been playing quite a few DYMs. I consider my HU game to be adequate and am happy to play a DYM game to its conclusion if that is what my opponent wants.
Anyway, I'm feeling bad about hijacking this thread now.
I disagree if so, because i may wish to multi table dyms from time to time, as i have done previously, and it is a great benefit. I have lost money before by missing a shove spot on the bubble because i am too busy trying to finish a game that should have ended already.
I accept your point about fun beginner games and i agree that this is important, but a dym for money is not the best medium for this imo. (perhaps keep it at the micro limits like £1 or less) but for the higher limits, i think the object of the game is to double your money... not to mess about... jmo
Once you have cashed, ignore that game. I struggle to see why that is so difficult.
Ok, lets compromise, ill have a button to press please that says end game, then my chips can be shared amongst the other two if they wish to continue.
Anyway i think we have exhausted this now on this thread. We discussed this at length previously HERE
Oh and 75% agreed with me on the thread mentioned above.
If every body got the same points , there would be no need to play on.
All other sites usually end the game when youu are in the money.
They do this for stellites as well in mtts.