You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Newcastle SPT Seats.

Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 171,071
edited January 2011 in The Sky Poker Tour

There was a meeting this morning, during which we discussed Newcastle SPT.

A number of things were dicussed, & I'll try & put on here what I can. Which will be most, if not all of it. (Some of it is, by necessity, private).

First up, it's wonderful that the Event has filled so quickly, with 5 or 6 weeks to spare. Extraordinary. Wearing our APAT hats, SPT Rich & myself, others too, are quite used to the problems associated with Events where demand far exceeds capacity. We use very simple rules - try to be fair, & right, to everyone, & never do things which may embarrass us if & when they become public. Sky Poker embrace these values wholeheartedly, so this morning's convo was fairly easy, really.

«1

Comments

  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 171,071
    edited November 2010

    It was agreed that, all things considered, which includes, but is not exclusive to, last night's Semi-Final, Machka should be given the opportunity to purchase his Newcstle SPT seat (£110). 

    So I rung Aaron (Machka) & he agreed to the money being deducted from his Account to pay for the Seat, & he seemed most appreciative of this.
     
    Machka therefore has his Seat.
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 171,071
    edited November 2010

    Slightly more difficult is the situation of the alleged collusion.

    Sky Poker do not discuss these things publically, they don't even tell me the outcome, either. This will not change.

    I sent all the stuff I was made aware of up to Head Office, & replied to everyone who wrote to me about it. Quite simply, thats as far as I can take it - beyond that, it's completely outside my remit. Anyone who wishes to discuss that further is free to do so via the correct channels - i.e, Customer Care. I've done all I can.

    In theory, & hypothetically, if one player was guilty of any improper play, that would generate one spare seat. And yet FOUR different players are writing to me about that seat, & some of them write daily. Please be patient, I can't keep up with them all. But please also remember that my role in the matter is now complete - there is no more I can do other than pass on your concerns. The daily incoming PM's are now getting a little aggressive. I'm sorry, but I've done all I can do, though I will reply to everyone as soon as I'm able.

    However, please be aware. Nothing, to my knowledge, was proven to be improper, so some of the wording in the PM's to me was a bit ott. We cannot go round accusing people of stuff without proof, not in the real world, anyway.

    More......
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 171,071
    edited November 2010

    One player qualified twice.

    Unbenown to SPT Rich & myself, (& it's actually none of our business), after he qualified on the second occasion, he was allowed to have the cash in lieu of the Seat credited to his Account. 

    The Rules do not say this is improper, neither do they say it is improper.

    Some of the Posts by SPT-Rich & myself may therefore have looked disingenuous. They were not, we were simply not aware, but I apologise if I caused any confusion, & I'm sure that applies to SPT-Rich, too

    So, in this morning's meet, the relevant Managers & Department Heads decided to look at tightenening up those Rules for future Events, so as to avoid potential conflict or argument. When demands exceeds supply or capacity, it's not really in the spirt of the SPT to double qualify. 

    In answer to the question that a "spare seat" had become available, & what had Sky Poker done with the money, there you have it. There is no spare seat, & the money was paid to him in lieu of his 2nd seat. Should any evidence exist, or be shown, that there was improper activity, this would be subject to review, of course.

  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 171,071
    edited November 2010


    Somehow - not sure how, in truth, given the individual concerned........Sky Rudolph won a  Seat to Newcastle Seat, too!

    Personally, & maybe with hindsight, I am not sure he should have entered. But he did, & once in it, he has to play to win, let there be no question about that. Tourney Poker is not a Team Game, & nobody here will ever be messing around in a Tourney.

    The question therefore arose, what to do with the Seat he won?

    It was quickly agreed this morning, this one is simple.

    The Seat will be added to "Santa's Sack", & will be given out to a player "as & when", just as everything else in Santas Sack will. I don't know the Santa Sack details, to be honest - my toes curl at the very thought of Christmas -but that's how it will be sorted.

    The Seat CAN be for Newcastle, but in reality, I suppose it could go for any regular Leg. If it goes to any Leg other than Newcastle, all well & good, that's a spare Newcastle seat. Getting rid of that (should it be necessary) won't be a problem, I fancy.....  
  • SolarCarroSolarCarro Member Posts: 2,273
    edited November 2010
    In Response to Re: Newcastle SPT Seats.:
    Slightly more difficult is the situation of the alleged collusion. Sky Poker do not discuss these things publically, they don't even tell me the outcome, either. This will not change. I sent all the stuff I was made aware of up to Head Office, & replied to everyone who wrote to me about it. Quite simply, thats as far as I can take it - beyond that, it's completely outside my remit. Anyone who wishes to discuss that further is free to do so via the correct channels - i.e, Customer Care. I've done all I can. In theory, & hypothetically, if one player was guilty of any improper play, that would generate one spare seat. And yet FOUR different players are writing to me about that seat, & some of them write daily. Please be patient, I can't keep up with them all. But please also remember that my role in the matter is now complete - there is no more I can do other than pass on your concerns. The daily incoming PM's are now getting a little aggressive. I'm sorry, but I've done all I can do, though I will reply to everyone as soon as I'm able. However, please be aware. Nothing, to my knowledge, was proven to be improper, so some of the wording in the PM's to me was a bit ott. We cannot go round accusing people of stuff without proof, not in the real world, anyway. More......
    Posted by Tikay10
    Just want to mirror what Tony says here, a lot of the "collusion" allegations surrounded a hand in which one player declared he had a set on a flop 10 high and another asked "how high", the original set claimer replied he had set of 10's he then bet 500 and both other players folded.

    Sian (Yorkie74) who plays a lot of live poker and would challenge any speech play like this was obviously confused and challenged them claiming they were colluding, looking at the situation like that it certainly seemed at the time that they were.

    Sian did not report this to customer care and took a fair bit of abuse over on the NPF over what she said to them, she was accused of not understanding their banter and having the personality of a brick!  As it happens Sky looked into the "set" hand and the player in question did not hold the hand he claimed. Therefore if he didn't have a set he wasn't colluding, just clever speech play, personally I think it is really bad etiquette.

    I know Sian had a chat with the NPF guys and they are all looking forward to meeting up, having a laugh and enjoying the event, alas Sian failed to qualify but she is looking forward to the side events.

    Tony also offered to stake a SNG between the NPF and team Knightplop as a gesture after this game, Sian quite rightly believes that is way above the call of duty and has told TK so.

    The Newcastle guys brought their unique style of banter to our tables and a few misconceptions were made, hopefully these answers draw a line under it all

    Thanks to Tony for being UN peacekeeper - sterling job grandad!!
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 171,071
    edited November 2010

    That still leaves a few issues. I cringe at some of the peurile name-calling that was directed at one of our most loyal players, it was just not necessary. Somehow, I am trying to make that good.

    I'm not going to discuss here & now how we try to square that equation, but it remains on my wish-list, or to-do List. I tend to get what I want in life & I'm 100% confident that I can sort the thing I need to.

    The people concerned know me well enough to trust me to handle this fairly, & correctly, & I will.
  • JAEGERBOMBJAEGERBOMB Member Posts: 1,516
    edited November 2010
    +100000000000000000000
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 171,071
    edited November 2010
    In Response to Re: Newcastle SPT Seats.:
    In Response to Re: Newcastle SPT Seats. : Just want to mirror what Tony says here, a lot of the "collusion" allegations surrounded a hand in which one player declared he had a set on a flop 10 high and another asked "how high", the original set claimer replied he had set of 10's he then bet 500 and both other players folded. Sian (Yorkie74) who plays a lot of live poker and would challenge any speech play like this was obviously confused and challenged them claiming they were colluding, looking at the situation like that it certainly seemed at the time that they were. Sian did not report this to customer care and took a fair bit of abuse over on the NPF over what she said to them, she was accused of not understanding their banter and having the personality of a brick!  As it happens Sky looked into the "set" hand and the player in question did not hold the hand he claimed. Therefore if he didn't have a set he wasn't colluding, just clever speech play, personally I think it is really bad etiquette. I know Sian had a chat with the NPF guys and they are all looking forward to meeting up, having a laugh and enjoying the event, alas Sian failed to qualify but she is looking forward to the side events. Tony also offered to stake a SNG between the NPF and team Knightplop as a gesture after this game, Sian quite rightly believes that is way above the call of duty and has told TK so. The Newcastle guys brought their unique style of banter to our tables and a few misconceptions were made, hopefully these answers draw a line under it all Thanks to Tony for being UN peacekeeper - sterling job grandad!!
    Posted by SolarCarro
    I was not aware of that, Dave, nor is it owt to do with me, but I'm not at all surprised by it. The lads up there get a bit loud & that sorta thing, but they don't cheat, not in the many years I've known them. Drink a shade too much on occasion, maybe, cheat, no.

    I was grateful for the PM from Sian as to my gesture, (on the list to reply to) but as far as I am concerned, the offer remains in place. I hate aggro like I cannot tell you, & this whole thing was not at all in the spirit of myself, or Sky Poker, & so I can only settle my mind about it by making the personal gesture that I did. I believe that the NPF Boys, & Plopper (truly the worst poker player I've ever met, bar Daiboot I suppose) has also offered to chuck a few bob in. A lot of fence-mending is going on here, which is really terrific, but it only takes one player to upset the newly-righted applecart......  

    As a sidenote, I cannot keep up with the incoming PM's because I'm being bombarded with "please Post on the "Longest Thread Thread"" PM's. I estimate over 150 so far & counting, they keep sending "round-robin" PM's, so my Inbox is creaking. Marvellous.
  • JAEGERBOMBJAEGERBOMB Member Posts: 1,516
    edited November 2010
    In Response to Re: Newcastle SPT Seats.:
    In Response to Re: Newcastle SPT Seats. : I was not aware of that, Dave, nor is it owt to do with me, but I'm not at all surprised by it. The lads up there get a bit loud & that sorta thing, but they don't cheat, not in the many years I've known them. Drink a shade too much on occasion, maybe, cheat, no. I was grateful for the PM from Sian as to my gesture, (on the list to reply to) but as far as I am concerned, the offer remains in place. I hate aggro like I cannot tell you, & this whole thing was not at all in the spirit of myself, or Sky Poker, & so I can only settle my mind about it by making the personal gesture that I did. I believe that the NPF Boys, & Plopper (truly the worst poker player I've ever met, bar Daiboot I suppose) has also offered to chuck a few bob in. A lot of fence-mending is going on here, which is really terrific, but it only takes one player to upset the newly-righted applecart......   As a sidenote, I cannot keep up with the incoming PM's because I'm being bombarded with "please Post on the "Longest Thread Thread"" PM's. I estimate over 150 so far & counting, they keep sending "round-robin" PM's, so my Inbox is creaking. Marvellous.
    Posted by Tikay10
    including Rich Orford???

    ffffsssssss
  • AmarieAmarie Member Posts: 448
    edited November 2010
    In Response to Re: Newcastle SPT Seats.:
    In Response to Re: Newcastle SPT Seats. : Just want to mirror what Tony says here, a lot of the "collusion" allegations surrounded a hand in which one player declared he had a set on a flop 10 high and another asked "how high", the original set claimer replied he had set of 10's he then bet 500 and both other players folded. Sian (Yorkie74) who plays a lot of live poker and would challenge any speech play like this was obviously confused and challenged them claiming they were colluding, looking at the situation like that it certainly seemed at the time that they were. Sian did not report this to customer care and took a fair bit of abuse over on the NPF over what she said to them, she was accused of not understanding their banter and having the personality of a brick!  As it happens Sky looked into the "set" hand and the player in question did not hold the hand he claimed. Therefore if he didn't have a set he wasn't colluding, just clever speech play, personally I think it is really bad etiquette. I know Sian had a chat with the NPF guys and they are all looking forward to meeting up, having a laugh and enjoying the event, alas Sian failed to qualify but she is looking forward to the side events. Tony also offered to stake a SNG between the NPF and team Knightplop as a gesture after this game, Sian quite rightly believes that is way above the call of duty and has told TK so. The Newcastle guys brought their unique style of banter to our tables and a few misconceptions were made, hopefully these answers draw a line under it all Thanks to Tony for being UN peacekeeper - sterling job grandad!!
    Posted by SolarCarro
    Great post Dave

    So sorry that Sian didn't qualify, but hey i'm sure the early exit from any of the Rochdale crew (probably me) will ensure she gets at least a  few sng's at Newcastle

    Looking forward to seeing you both

    Anne
    X
  • TRIP5TRIP5 Member Posts: 3,618
    edited November 2010
    Woooooooooo-hoooooooooooooo

    Nice one Aaron...don't forget your toothbrush ;o)

    xx

  • SoLackSoLack Member Posts: 2,737
    edited November 2010
    Pleased for Aaron, and I may not be aware of all the circumstances but does this not set a precedent that any player who finishes 2nd in a 9 runner SPT qualifier will get the option to make up the difference?
  • JAEGERBOMBJAEGERBOMB Member Posts: 1,516
    edited November 2010
    I hope this matter is put to rest quickly...........This wouldnt exactly be a precedent, as i believe Direwolf finished 2nd in  Viva Las Vegas Final and made up the difference, correct me if im wrong.............And actually, i think it would be a good idea that if the same thing happens again in future that the 2nd place player in a FINAL 9 runner qualifier was allowed to make up the difference, as long as it was only in the last chance Semi-final and all players are aware.
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 171,071
    edited December 2010
    In Response to Re: Newcastle SPT Seats.:
    Pleased for Aaron, and I may not be aware of all the circumstances but does this not set a precedent that any player who finishes 2nd in a 9 runner SPT qualifier will get the option to make up the difference?
    Posted by SoLack
    Hi Solly,

    Here's what I Posted earlier in the Thread........

    ".....It was agreed that, all things considered, which includes, but is not exclusive to, last night's Semi-Final, Machka should be given the opportunity to purchase his Newcstle SPT seat (£110)......"

    And that sums it up, really. Last night's Semi - capped at 10 runners, & long sold-out - had the misfortune to have a player withdraw due to personal reasons some 15 seconds before the Tourney started, so there was no time for anyone else to Register, so that in itself was a bit unusual.

    But that was only a small part of the reasoning, overall it was much wider than that. (As you will realise when I get round to replying to your PM reply of late last week).

    I have a small allocation of Seats for each SPT for various purposes, & if I have any spare seats I allocate them as I see fit, wholly mindful of Community & commercial reasoning. In this & some other cases, the Seats are paid for by the player, other times, where appropriate, Seats may be given away.

    I do not see any precadent here, & if anyone finishes runner-up in a 9 seat Semi, that will not bring any pressure to bear to allow them to buy a seat.
  • SoLackSoLack Member Posts: 2,737
    edited December 2010
    ok thanks for the quick reply
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 171,071
    edited December 2010
    In Response to Re: Newcastle SPT Seats.:
    ok thanks for the quick reply
    Posted by SoLack
    YW. I have now replied to the PM, too.

    Been some long day today, but I'm done now.
  • EL_HORNOEL_HORNO Member Posts: 7
    edited December 2010
    In Response to Re: Newcastle SPT Seats.:
    In Response to Re: Newcastle SPT Seats. : YW. I have now replied to the PM, too. Been some long day today, but I'm done now.
    Posted by Tikay10
    so let me get this right , a player who finishes 2nd with only 1 seat advertised , gets a seat ,!!!!!!
    yet on a different night 5 seats are advertised and only 4 get given!!!!!!!
    am i the only one who thinks this is not quite right ??????
  • SPTSPT Member Posts: 5,648
    edited December 2010
    Not strictly true

    5 seats were given except as tikay said above

    "
    One player qualified twice.

    Unbenown to SPT Rich & myself, (& it's actually none of our business), after he qualified on the second occasion, he was allowed to have the cash in lieu of the Seat credited to his Account "

    the seat was still won.
  • EL_HORNOEL_HORNO Member Posts: 7
    edited December 2010
    In Response to Re: Newcastle SPT Seats.:
    Not strictly true 5 seats were given except as tikay said above " One player qualified twice. Unbenown to SPT Rich & myself, (& it's actually none of our business), after he qualified on the second occasion, he was allowed to have the cash in lieu of the Seat credited to his Account " the seat was still won.
    Posted by SPT
    4 seats were won ,and 1 player rec £110 , as i am led to believe
  • SPTSPT Member Posts: 5,648
    edited December 2010
    Yes. Five seats were won in the satellite as all others though.

    It subsequently emerged (to myself and tikay) that one of those seats was exchanged for cash though, as has been explained above.


Sign In or Register to comment.