I've checked under the bonnet and the RNG seems to be working OK.
The only other thing that I can suggest is that your opponents aren't good enough to understand your level 6.5 plays. Have you considered playing against better players?
I've checked under the bonnet and the RNG seems to be working OK. The only other thing that I can suggest is that your opponents aren't good enough to understand your level 6.5 plays. Have you considered playing against better players? Posted by MereNovice
I've checked under the bonnet and the RNG seems to be working OK. The only other thing that I can suggest is that your opponents aren't good enough to understand your level 6.5 plays. Have you considered playing against better players? Posted by MereNovice
Good thinking StatMan.
That's my problem - I'm playing bad players. Can't beat bad players, obv. Give me good players, they are easy to beat.*
In Response to Re: *** TSP Classic League 2 *** - Standings after 3 events : Good thinking StatMan. That's my problem - I'm playing bad players. Can't beat bad players, obv. Give me good players, they are easy to beat.* * Add smiley if in doubt. Posted by Tikay10
Nice one. I've booked you a place in the next PCA High Rollers event. All you have to do is transfer me the $100,000 entry fee. I've explained to them that you only ever play AA and that may mean that you do a fair amount of folding pre-flop but they've said that it isn't a problem. They're happy to issue you with a "sat out" button which you can place in front of you permanently to save time.
I have examined that spreadsheet carefully, & cannot see my name, though I only looked at the top 200 names. May I enquire why that is? Posted by Tikay10
Comments
The only other thing that I can suggest is that your opponents aren't good enough to understand your level 6.5 plays.
Have you considered playing against better players?
That's my problem - I'm playing bad players. Can't beat bad players, obv. Give me good players, they are easy to beat.*
* Add smiley if in doubt.
Was a good call though right? :-)
After 4 events, the standings are:
There were 182 runners in the 5th event.
After 5 events, the standings are:
I have examined that spreadsheet carefully, & cannot see my name, though I only looked at the top 200 names.
May I enquire why that is?
I can see you.
There were 217 runners in the 6th event.
After 6 events, the standings are:
Have there ever been back-to-back wins in this before, Vince?
Well Done lJamesl on your 2 in a row Wins
After 7 events, the standings are:
After 8 events, the standings are:
After 9 events, the standings are:
After 10 events, the standings are: