You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

is this too much?

spornybolspornybol Member Posts: 8,212
edited February 2011 in The Poker Clinic
this is a £1.15 dym with so many limper was my bet too much or should it be smaller, if so how much shoul i bet ? edit hand id if needed 337230021
PlayerActionCardsAmountPotBalance
mrsweird Small blind   75.00 75.00 2235.00
trap2line Big blind   150.00 225.00 500.00
  Your hole cards
  • 10
  • 10
     
SUNBEAM Call   150.00 375.00 3113.75
MOGGIEMAG Call   150.00 525.00 1865.00
scorpio13 Call   150.00 675.00 1605.00
spornybol Raise   750.00 1425.00 1256.25
«1

Comments

  • YOUNG_GUNYOUNG_GUN Member Posts: 8,948
    edited February 2011
    I'd probably shove instead, only if you have no evidence that anyone has limped with a monster before

    I'm happy to take whats in there, also if called should be a favourate for the hand
  • tapewormtapeworm Member Posts: 432
    edited February 2011
    Im with Young gun here on the shove.....for the reason he said above, and also for an effective raise here we need to be doing at least 3 BB + 1 more for each limper (so actually raise is a little light) - this would pot commit you anyway.

    so its a shove or fold.....being its a DYM is there a case for a fold here?

    *awaits Dohhhh to tell him off for such thoughts*
  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH Member Posts: 17,929
    edited February 2011
    In Response to Re: is this too much?:
    Im with Young gun here on the shove.....for the reason he said above, and also for an effective raise here we need to be doing at least 3 BB + 1 more for each limper (so actually raise is a little light) - this would pot commit you anyway. so its a shove or fold.....being its a DYM is there a case for a fold here? *awaits Dohhhh to tell him off for such thoughts*
    Posted by tapeworm
    Lol!! Do I always disagree with you like? I hadn't noticed!!!


    But yeh, easy shove here - fold equity is your friend :)


  • spornybolspornybol Member Posts: 8,212
    edited February 2011
    In Response to Re: is this too much?:
    I'd probably shove instead, only if you have no evidence that anyone has limped with a monster before I'm happy to take whats in there, also if called should be a favourate for the hand
    Posted by YOUNG_GUN
    no-one has limped with a monster there`s normally a raise with a decent hand, ie a/j and above but the table was also quite passive at times, so just limping with half decent hands
  • YOUNG_GUNYOUNG_GUN Member Posts: 8,948
    edited February 2011
    Just shove then, if you get 1 or more callers hard to know where you at. 10s are going to be vulnerable here and less then 15 bb perfect spot for a shove. that was my only caution if you had seen someone limp with aces/kings before
  • N1CKN1CK Member Posts: 1,453
    edited February 2011
    i think once you raise to that amount its pretty bad to fold at any point pre or post flop, calling could be an option if it was less than a 15th of you stack, shoving cant be bad
  • waynecwaynec Member Posts: 1,023
    edited February 2011
    In Response to Re: is this too much?:
    i think once you raise to that amount its pretty bad to fold at any point pre or post flop, calling could be an option if it was less than a 15th of you stack, shoving cant be bad
    Posted by N1CK
    This correct you may as well shove pre you cant be bluffed if an over card falls on the flop.
  • spornybolspornybol Member Posts: 8,212
    edited February 2011
    i would also like too say, when i have shoved before with ie, pocket 10s i seem to get a caller, maybe because they think i`m stealing what`s in the pot and they seem to hit at least if i do this raise i can re-ajust on flop ?
  • CLIOKIDCLIOKID Member Posts: 783
    edited February 2011
    In Response to Re: is this too much?:
    i would also like too say, when i have shoved before with ie, pocket 10s i seem to get a caller, maybe because they think i`m stealing what`s in the pot and they seem to hit at least if i do this raise i can re-ajust on flop ?
    Posted by spornybol
    Don't be results orientated.

    If you shoved tens before and lost to someone who was a dog when the chips went in you still played the hand correctly.

    It would be pretty bad to raise nearly half your stack pre and then fold to a bet on the flop so just shove pre and take away any tricky decision you might have.
  • AcidMan27AcidMan27 Member Posts: 3,752
    edited February 2011
    In Response to Re: is this too much?:
    In Response to Re: is this too much? : Don't be results orientated. If you shoved tens before and lost to someone who was a dog when the chips went in you still played the hand correctly. It would be pretty bad to raise nearly half your stack pre and then fold to a bet on the flop so just shove pre and take away any tricky decision you might have.
    Posted by CLIOKID
    This is my way of thinking. Keep it simple so you don't have to make any tough decisions after the flop.
  • N1CKN1CK Member Posts: 1,453
    edited February 2011
    In Response to Re: is this too much?:
    i would also like too say, when i have shoved before with ie, pocket 10s i seem to get a caller, maybe because they think i`m stealing what`s in the pot and they seem to hit at least if i do this raise i can re-ajust on flop ?
    Posted by spornybol
    if you are thinking like this the best option for you is to fold pre, also with a short stack in the blinds whos getting a great price to call with any two and if he does call it might tempt some other call  so as its a dym folding could be an option
  • N1CKN1CK Member Posts: 1,453
    edited February 2011
    another thought iv had is in these sngs your objection should be not to win or cash but to increase your equity share, you all start of with the same amount 16.6%, when other players get involved in pots the player that wins his equity increases and the player/s that lose decrease and the players not involved increase, so if everyone is limping in pre and getting involved it could be a good idea to let them get on with it and you could potentially fold your way to more equity, obviously this should be a good tactic in the early stages with a healthy stack
  • tapewormtapeworm Member Posts: 432
    edited February 2011
    In Response to Re: is this too much?:
    another thought iv had is in these sngs your objection should be not to win or cash but to increase your equity share, you all start of with the same amount 16.6%, when other players get involved in pots the player that wins his equity increases and the player/s that lose decrease and the players not involved increase, so if everyone is limping in pre and getting involved it could be a good idea to let them get on with it and you could potentially fold your way to more equity, obviously this should be a good tactic in the early stages with a healthy stack
    Posted by N1CK
    This is why I thought there may be a reason to fold!!!! Except i dont know how to put it like that.

    Its still a shove for me though
  • N1CKN1CK Member Posts: 1,453
    edited February 2011
    In Response to Re: is this too much?:
    In Response to Re: is this too much? : This is why I thought there may be a reason to fold!!!! Except i dont know how to put it like that. Its still a shove for me though
    Posted by tapeworm
    if your thinking about increasing your equity rather than trying to win or cash you will make better decisions

    Equity=summary of money expectation in a sng
    increased equity=increased expectation=make money
  • YOUNG_GUNYOUNG_GUN Member Posts: 8,948
    edited February 2011
    In Response to Re: is this too much?:
    In Response to Re: is this too much? : if your thinking about increasing your equity rather than trying to win or cash you will make better decisions Equity=summary of money expectation in a sng increased equity=increased expectation=make money
    Posted by N1CK

    Still a standard shove in my books, regardless whether we increase our equity blinds are catching up with us and we are not in the top 3
  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH Member Posts: 17,929
    edited February 2011

    It's just a clear shove. 100% 

    Thinking about it any other way is a waste of time and only going to pickle your brain.


  • JohnConnorJohnConnor Member Posts: 1,160
    edited February 2011
    Definate shove. This is a perfect spot - 1/3rd of your stack in the middle + 10s on the button + no strength shown = shove 100% of the time.
  • N1CKN1CK Member Posts: 1,453
    edited February 2011
    In Response to Re: is this too much?:
    Definate shove. This is a perfect spot - 1/3rd of your stack in the middle + 10s on the button + no strength shown = shove 100% of the time.
    Posted by JohnConnor
    he has a 3rd of his stack in the middle because he raised so he cant shove=your sum is incorrect lol
  • N1CKN1CK Member Posts: 1,453
    edited February 2011
    In Response to Re: is this too much?:
    In Response to Re: is this too much? : Still a standard shove in my books, regardless whether we increase our equity blinds are catching up with us and we are not in the top 3
    Posted by YOUNG_GUN
    all im saying there is an argument to fold, im not saying its correct because i dont know, and also he IS in the top 3 or was before he raised
  • JohnConnorJohnConnor Member Posts: 1,160
    edited February 2011
    In Response to Re: is this too much?:
    In Response to Re: is this too much? : he has a 3rd of his stack in the middle because he raised so he cant shove=your sum is incorrect lol
    Posted by N1CK
    No mate. His stack is 750 + 1256.25 = 2006.25. There was 675 in the middle before his turn to act. 675 is 33.64% of 2006.25. I rounded that to a third, I assumed that would be OK.
Sign In or Register to comment.