You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
Low limit is sooooooo different to other limits that i think it deserves its own thread.
now dont get me wrong, i 100% appreciate the higher stakes regs advice.....but sometimes it applys to people who are playing against an opposition that dont understand pot odds.....when to fold......starting hands......are drunkun shoving every hand.
I personally find it hard - i go up to £100.....back down to £80 and back to £100 again. And repeatedly am told - if you cant beat low limits then dont go up................I agree.
But there is no point in an NL4 Player thinking any further than.........level 1......fact. A good poker player this makes not. The advice you get when you post is great - in fact you would never get a top reg replying to your NL4 post like i have, on any other site.
HOWEVER: the top guns speak of range, VPP.....etc......this isnt something we need to worry about, not yrt - but it is great to see/ put into context. i think what we could do with is a thread where NL4-10 put there peice in.....preferably sepearatly- I.E NL4......NL8.......NL10. - or a low limit forum SKY my dear chaps. Chaplets.
If enough low limit players get on board, then i propose we ask for a small limit version of the clinic..... ithink it would be invaulable to SKYpoker and its starter players.....and less formidible to non posters thus far........what say you SKY?
- I in no way am denouncing the regular advice i get on my hands from higher players - in fact its great and i aprreciate it 100% - long may it continue. hopefully a lower forum could create arguments on both side of the coin is all -
Thanks
THE WORM
Comments
im prolly missing the point of this thread but my points are well valid
All im trying to say is that there is a different way you need to think for the lower levels - (not and a low level thread discussion would help newer players discuss plays on there level.....and may help newer players feel they can post hands easier - that is all really.
Like i say in the first post - i REALLY appreciate the higher level players posts, long may it continue!!! And of course they should post in the suggested low level forum - i agree that we couldnt improve without it.... i dunno just think a lower level stakes discussion could be benificial
Maybe the low limit advising part of my argument is flawed - but i do think it would help newer players be more open to posting hands.
Its pretty scary posting a hand for the first time in the clinic - amongst all these threads talking of 3 betting, VPP etc when all you wanna know is - was your TPTK min bet a good idea?
There is no need for a seperate forum as the reg 4nl players can add to any thread along with the higher stakes regs..... which allows you to benchmark the advise offered!
Ive had this problem soo many times, NL8 is the exact same.
This is partly why i hate NL4, however it is a very beatable level with the right patience it just takes a lifetime to make 10BIs unless you run good or get lucky in table selection.
Good advice is good advice whatever level it is aimed at or from.
the problem with NL4 I find is that there is "less respect" for the standard plays you see higher up. Whether this is due to the more recreational type of player or those that just gamble as a buyin doesn't mean much, I don't know. I know people say "raise bigger pre" etcetera. Players at NL4 often just don't believe you and if you go on a downswing you can lose a fair bit of your buyin/bankroll quickly.
Just makes it difficult to move up.
I would love to go higher but due to the roll i can put in i have to wait until I reach a certain amount. I was doing great and would have reached it before Christmas but went on a downswing when nothing was going right,etc. Hopefully will do it before Easter now!