Recently I've been reading and learning from Harrington, and trying to work on restructuring my cash approach, and trying to use the slightly more conservative approach to big hands.
Villain is new to table- on the flop, KK has good showdown as well as the gutshot too- ordinarily I would c-bet this mostly and carry on representing the A, but as Harrington would say- small hand, small pot- if I bet, I'm essentially turning a solid hand with a moderate draw into a bluff, since if I get raised I have no business being in the hand. In position I probably bet out, opinions on the flop? My c-bet frequency so far had been pretty high, villain may have seen me c-bet once or twice since arriving.
After seeing his check, I put a feeler bet out to see what was happening. The call tells me one of two things, I think- he has an A, or he just picked up a flush draw.
Based on that, when I see the flush on the river I have one of two choices- attempt to rep it, or check with intention of folding. If he has the flush he's never folding, if he has the A he's still unlikely to fold I think- but did I give up on the kings a little too cheaply?
I think I'm probably beat, and how I would normally play I lose a lot more money, just curious how people find this approach.
Player | Action | Cards | Amount | Pot | Balance |
---|
dogcharlie | Small blind | | £0.10 | £0.10 | £19.70 |
blueberr27 | Big blind | | £0.20 | £0.30 | £20.17 |
| Your hole cards | | | | |
DeucesLive | Raise | | £0.60 | £0.90 | £37.69 |
MJX | Fold | | | | |
xxxx | Call | | £0.60 | £1.50 | £15.74 |
blackbeltb | Fold | | | | |
dogcharlie | Fold | | | | |
blueberr27 | Fold | | | | |
Flop |
---|
| | | | | |
DeucesLive | Check | | | | |
xxxx | Check | | | | |
Turn |
---|
| | | | | |
DeucesLive | Bet | | £0.80 | £2.30 | £36.89 |
xxxx | Call | | £0.80 | £3.10 | £14.94 |
River |
---|
| | | | | |
DeucesLive | Check | | | | |
xxxx | Bet | | £1.55 | £4.65 | £13.39 |
DeucesLive | Fold | | | | |
Comments
Having got involved, flop looks great- but again, I stuck with a conservative approach until someone massively overbet the pot. Easy fold, or call/raise? I felt the hand was too vulnerable on that board personally, but is it worth seeing a little more? Villain had hardly been involved in any hands, but I did see him make one big overbet previously- never saw the end result, though.
This flop looks pretty decent for my hand, but multiway it looks extremely dangerous which is why I took the line of checking and looking for some info- my thought was that although there's a possibility I'm ahead, it's probably not by much- the flop has hit the limpers range hard, and I'm very likely to be behind now to a two pair combo, possibly even the made straight. With only 20p invested, I decided it's probably safest to just duck out of the way now before things get too aggro- I don't want to call his bet and essentially chase the J, since that's the only card in the deck really helping me, and I certainly can't warrant raising and getting myself pot stuck.
Is any of this line of thought flawed at this level? Should I be giving up this quickly- sure, it's top pair and very strong kicker, but it just seems to be dominated by too many hands for me to really feel any confidence in it.
What sort of hand is he flatting the turn with that he is prepared to call river shove with?
On the flop after the check, again looks pretty painless but he put a little dwell up before calling, and again I had concerns- possible set of 8's, or still the overpair- course, overcards are still very possible or A8 at a push. After the check on the turn I decided to check behind and see what he did- if he was on a bluff, he's going away, and if he has me crushed I'm now committed to calling off.
On the river he checks again, and this is the major decision now- do I valuebet? If I do, how many hands call me that I beat? Possibly A8 and definitely 99, but I can't think of many more. If he has checked a monster (I have a very aggressive rep at the table so far) then again, I'm pot stuck. So is checking behind acceptable here or possibly missing out on value?
Of course, I think he was drawing to the flush himself, so I doubt I was getting anything more this time anyway, but my logic was it's better to bet huge and get called on the rare occasions he does have something, than bet small and most likely get no action apart from on those occasions anyway.
I'll often vbet normally there, but been trying this move once or twice and it does seem to get paid off more than you'd expect so far.
Still have a hugely aggressive tendency, and bet out on every flop whether hit or not- felt this one is right in his range, so went for the check on flop, left the turn as well to give him room to bluff river.
Went for the value bet on river, and got called by a slowplayed set which obviously got cold feet on the river- think that was a very poor bet on my part, is there anything here that calls me which isn't beating me?