You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

CONSTENTLY BAD BEATS AND 2 OUTERS

2»

Comments

  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH Member Posts: 17,929
    edited April 2011
    Folding the 4's pre here would be madness @ 20/30nl. 

    The hand is just a cooler. UL.

    If this is consistantly happening there isn't alot you can do about it to be honest. Nobody can really help you............

    If you post some hands that aren't as straight forward, where you maybe make a marginal call/fold, you'll get more/better help.


  • HartshorNHartshorN Member Posts: 616
    edited April 2011
    Went in behind, came out behind.

    I was in the same position as you mate over 2 months i analysed the percentage that i went in at, and it was 77% in my favour, i won 23% of them hands. This was out of a good 30 or so hands i went in ahead.

    So what did i do?

    Stopped playing for a good 2 months, Re-cooperate, find the love for the game again, and just focus on other things for a bit.
  • grantorinograntorino Member Posts: 4,710
    edited April 2011
    In Response to Re: CONSTENTLY BAD BEATS AND 2 OUTERS:
    Folding the 4's pre here would be madness @ 20/30nl.Posted by DOHHHHHHH
    really? Are 3bet ranges that nitty? I cant see calling the 3bet being anything more than very marginally profitable, and I would think its probably -EV longterm
  • CrazyBen23CrazyBen23 Member Posts: 865
    edited April 2011
    In Response to Re: CONSTENTLY BAD BEATS AND 2 OUTERS:
    In Response to Re: CONSTENTLY BAD BEATS AND 2 OUTERS : Lots of people 3bet AK and QQ , some 3bet wider, some 3bet bluff sometimes (Not many in last 2 categories given positions) They dont always stack off either, eg KK on a A high flop, missed AK. With reads it can be a call but readless I think its a fold  Also as you can see above you dont win 100% of the time you flop a set
    Posted by grantorino
    Normally yes, but this is 20nl
  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH Member Posts: 17,929
    edited April 2011
    In Response to Re: CONSTENTLY BAD BEATS AND 2 OUTERS:
    In Response to Re: CONSTENTLY BAD BEATS AND 2 OUTERS : really? Are 3bet ranges that nitty? I cant see calling the 3bet being anything more than very marginally profitable, and I would think its probably -EV longterm
    Posted by grantorino
    everytime I flop a set, mentally I have doubled up. 

    I actually quite like been 3bet when I've opened 22-88, especially if I've been called in 1/2 spots before the guy 3 bets.

    You're prob right higher up the limits, but if you flop a set at 20/30nl in a 3bet pot, you double up.

    :)
  • grantorinograntorino Member Posts: 4,710
    edited April 2011
    In Response to Re: CONSTENTLY BAD BEATS AND 2 OUTERS:
    In Response to Re: CONSTENTLY BAD BEATS AND 2 OUTERS : everytime I flop a set, mentally I have doubled up.  I actually quite like been 3bet when I've opened 22-88, especially if I've been called in 1/2 spots before the guy 3 bets. You're prob right higher up the limits, but if you flop a set at 20/30nl in a 3bet pot, you double up. :)
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH
    Obv if its likely to be multiway this changes things. Betsizing and stacksizes clearly have an effect too

    Bit surprised you think you double thru 100% of time u flop a set, if its true then call pre 100BB deep all day
  • DirtyDollaDirtyDolla Member Posts: 2
    edited April 2011

    i think 44 is defo a fold.you know your not ahead pre so just muck it and move on.grantorinos hit the nail on the head.i wouldnt listen to advice off anyone called "crazy" ben.

  • S_I_T_HS_I_T_H Member Posts: 22
    edited April 2011
    In Response to Re: CONSTENTLY BAD BEATS AND 2 OUTERS:
    Went in behind, came out behind. I was in the same position as you mate over 2 months i analysed the percentage that i went in at, and it was 77% in my favour, i won 23% of them hands. This was out of a good 30 or so hands i went in ahead. So what did i do? Stopped playing for a good 2 months, Re-cooperate, find the love for the game again, and just focus on other things for a bit.
    Posted by HartshorN
    OK CHEERS DUDE.
  • CrazyBen23CrazyBen23 Member Posts: 865
    edited April 2011
    I'm 1000000% with doh on this, if you people stop being morons for a min its obv wwe are right, and lol at dirtydolla, first post i see... prob the worst post ull ever make, folding if ur behind pre lolol ok u keep playin like that dude
  • grantorinograntorino Member Posts: 4,710
    edited April 2011
    In Response to Re: CONSTENTLY BAD BEATS AND 2 OUTERS:
    I'm 1000000% with doh on this, if you people stop being morons for a min its obv wwe are right, and lol at dirtydolla, first post i see... prob the worst post ull ever make, folding if ur behind pre lolol ok u keep playin like that dude
    Posted by CrazyBen23
    Im not a moron just because I disagree with you. And its far from obvious you are right. There are situations where you can call a 3bet OOP with small pocket pairs, but I think people in this thread are overestimating their implied odds
  • pod1pod1 Member Posts: 4,377
    edited April 2011
    im with you and dohh on this, you cant fold pre, mind you dirty can play!!
  • CrazyBen23CrazyBen23 Member Posts: 865
    edited April 2011
    Ofc there are situations were u can folding PP's. higher up for example people wont even stack off with AA/KK and 3bet much wider, but to fold in this situation is just a no-no.
  • DirtyDollaDirtyDolla Member Posts: 2
    edited April 2011
    HA HA benny boy, keep biting you lil dumb fish.
  • N1CKN1CK Member Posts: 1,453
    edited April 2011
    In Response to Re: CONSTENTLY BAD BEATS AND 2 OUTERS:
    In Response to Re: CONSTENTLY BAD BEATS AND 2 OUTERS : Im not a moron just because I disagree with you. And its far from obvious you are right. There are situations where you can call a 3bet OOP with small pocket pairs, but I think people in this thread are overestimating their implied odds
    Posted by grantorino
    i dont think its a mistake to fold small PPs to 3 bets oop but i would agree that its a bit closer at these stakes
  • sikassikas Member Posts: 857
    edited April 2011
    3bet set mining is sooo bad, u BOTH need to be at least 170+bb's deep to do this profitably...im with grantorino on this...the rest of you have big leaks in your game


    u (and villain) need at least 15-16x the raise amount for the implied odds for it to be EV+ and pray that villain is an uber-nit/donk that gets married to his hand

    even if his 3bet range is so polarised i.e KK-AA (which is absurd) 

    he aint gonna stack off on... 

    monochrome board
    co-ordinated board ( 8-10-J) or (5-7-8) etc...
    A high flop when he has KK
    that third heart comes on the turn etc...
    PLUS we lose the times he has set over set
    or he makes runner runner str8/flush or someshit


    also u need to consider are u closing the action?
    and remember ur only playing for 95% of villains stack (rake)

    *sigh* heads up 100bb's deep this is so bad, multi-way, its a small 3bet AND u close the action its a different story
  • SmitalosSmitalos Member Posts: 539
    edited April 2011
    I can't really say anything new without echoing what's already been said, but yeah, variacne happens i'm afraid. If you had the AA in that spot, you'd see the 44's and be like "OMFG, so sick!" and think it was a huge bad beat. But when the A hits you'd think "well, that's justice" and not think any more of it. Even if they've got 0.01%, it will happen SOMEtimes, just ul on the fact he sucked out. Oh, and you can't fold the 44 pre there to the 3bet either imo. Nh wp, ul.
    Cheers,
    Carlos Smitalos
Sign In or Register to comment.