4 of you left & 1 very short stack lets say 300/400. theres always 1(big stack) who nomatter what makes the short stack a big stack so were all back to square 1. im sure some people dont understand you only need to finish in the top 3 TO GET PAID
i cashed but it was shockin a 5.50 dym aswell lol. surely theres no need 2 attack the shorty unless yr holdin sumthin special? Posted by dogcharlie
surley this is the best idea. he has to have something to go all in doesnt he. so by betting to put him all in means hes folding more. This is a trait i use loads in MTTs Attack the shortys, punnish the limpers, and just in gerneral controled aggression.
I know i play mtts alot so i might not be the right man to comment (would be great if JohnConnor or someone similar could confirm this to me) but surely raising and attacking the shortys blinds is +EV.
4 of you left & 1 very short stack lets say 300/400. theres always 1(big stack) who nomatter what makes the short stack a big stack so were all back to square 1. im sure some people dont understand you only need to finish in the top 3 TO GET PAID Posted by dogcharlie
Hi charlie
Could I ask, what would the blinds be?, what position was the bigstack in?
the guy 2 my left was attackin the shorty every time not even thinkin about it that aint clever so in the end he ended up not cashin because of it lol Posted by dogcharlie
i would hardly call it a bad play tbh. As i stated i play mtts so dyms might be different, but if theirs a shorty im rasing their blinds if everyone else if folding 100% of the time to keep the pressure on em. Very profitable and +EV imo.
Comments
I know i play mtts alot so i might not be the right man to comment (would be great if JohnConnor or someone similar could confirm this to me) but surely raising and attacking the shortys blinds is +EV.
Could I ask, what would the blinds be?, what position was the bigstack in?