You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

is any 2 suited worth a call of 5 BB's?

sedgley58sedgley58 Member Posts: 171
edited June 2011 in The Poker Clinic
I ask because three times tonight i upped to 5 BB's with good hands and lost each one to a caller with 2 suited

My JJ, flop was 10,7,2, i pot raise he calls, 6 on turn, i pot raise, 3 on the river, he has 10-3 suited

My AK, flop 2,6,9, i half pot, he calls, jack on turn, i half pot, he calls, another jack i raise he calls with Q-2 suited

My AK, flop A(hearts),K and ??, i pot he all ins with K-5 suited and hits two hearts on the river and turn

If i had q-2, 10-3 or K-5 suited i would fold to a 5 BB, am I wrong or did i just hit three lucky fish who managed to knobble my BR. Only the 3rd hand flushed, other 2 were no where near, yet still bet out on 2's and 10's with a 3 kicker.

Comments

  • grantorinograntorino Member Posts: 4,710
    edited June 2011
    you know the answer to this question. He shouldnt call. Never triple barrell bluff this guy
  • sedgley58sedgley58 Member Posts: 171
    edited June 2011
    GT, it was 3 different opponents
  • AMYBRAMYBR Member Posts: 3,432
    edited June 2011
    Your not asking if its good enough to call, your asking why do people call.

    Totally depends on a players skillset/stack and position.  Deep stack cash isnt about massive starting hands colliding.  Even a solid rock playing pure premium cards,  will still open up depending on stack and position.

    Deepstack NLHE is a flop game, you SHOULD BE getting 100's of BB's in pre with maybe two hands.  Yet you can get 100's of BB's in on flop or river with connected draw heavy hands. 

    Players detrimentaley accuse people of being a "fish" in a cash game, not really understanding that this is a purely valid way to approach the game.

    I just came in from a 5hour cash session.  My least profitable hand on the night was AA aipf being cracked in two spots.  My most profitable being the 2d4d from the button in a multi way pot flopping the nut wheel, no later street weakening my hand.  Nothing wrong with calling drawy to connect with the right board.
  • grantorinograntorino Member Posts: 4,710
    edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: is any 2 suited worth a call of 5 BB's?:
    Your not asking if its good enough to call, your asking why do people call. Totally depends on a players skillset/stack and position.  Deep stack cash isnt about massive starting hands colliding.  Even a solid rock playing pure premium cards,  will still open up depending on stack and position. Deepstack NLHE is a flop game, you SHOULD BE getting 100's of BB's in pre with maybe two hands.  Yet you can get 100's of BB's in on flop or river with connected draw heavy hands.  Players detrimentaley accuse people of being a "fish" in a cash game, not really understanding that this is a purely valid way to approach the game. I just came in from a 5hour cash session.  My least profitable hand on the night was AA aipf being cracked in two spots.  My most profitable being the 2d4d from the button in a multi way pot flopping the nut wheel, no later street weakening my hand.  Nothing wrong with calling drawy to connect with the right board.
    Posted by AMYBR
    While some of the points you make are valid, I dont think you are comparing like with like.  Look at the way the hands in op played out. I would also be pretty sure they are online cash hands and so are prob less than 100BB deep. The hands in the original post are against fish

    Your example also proves nothing.AA is often cracked and any two cards can make the nuts. I can see why playing 2d4d ip in the deep cash games you play would be fine though
  • AMYBRAMYBR Member Posts: 3,432
    edited June 2011
    Was speaking of fishing in cash in general, not essentially regarding hands posted by OP'ster.  As his question is generic in principle, extending beyond the hands he posts and talking about game theory in general.

    I'm not trying to prove anything with the A's reference.  What I really meant to say is I'd be happier putting 100's of bigs in post than pre (with the right board), even with A's or K's.

    He's asking is is profitable to call 5bbs with any 2 suited.  I'm providing an argument for yes in deepstack cash for the right board.  Obviously not the river suckouts seen in OP.  Was answering the broader question.
  • grantorinograntorino Member Posts: 4,710
    edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: is any 2 suited worth a call of 5 BB's?:
    Was speaking of fishing in cash in general, not essentially regarding hands posted by OP'ster.  As his question is generic in principle, extending beyond the hands he posts and talking about game theory in general. I'm not trying to prove anything with the A's reference.  What I really meant to say is I'd be happier putting 100's of bigs in post than pre (with the right board), even with A's or K's. He's asking is is profitable to call 5bbs with any 2 suited.  I'm providing an argument for yes in deepstack cash for the right board.  Obviously not the river suckouts seen in OP.  Was answering the broader question.
    Posted by AMYBR
    Generally its not, which is my point. In fact it would have to be a very specific situation (imo anyway) to make flatting a 5BB raise with T3s good. Yes you can call wider in deepstack cash, although the flipside of that is you have to be wary of non nut draws, and realize if you do get it in with a draw you will be against better than 1 pair most times unless villain is a fish.

    I dont really want to have a big debate about this, the answer to op's question is probably in general you shouldnt call with hands just because they are sooted unless they have other value. Its poker so very little is absolute, there are probably exceptions to this
  • AMYBRAMYBR Member Posts: 3,432
    edited June 2011
    I'm not talking about 103, I would never advocate calling with random junk.

    I'm talking about hands with intrinic value pre sat deep, not raggedy 103s because they are suited.

    The question in the OP wasnt a real question, it was a moan.  So I expanded upon the real question behind it.  Am advocating calling to draw with a drawable hand, not being 103s or such.

    I'm never calling with such a nonsense hand, I'm highlighting peoples perception that fishing, in deep stack cash, is a bad thing.

  • sedgley58sedgley58 Member Posts: 171
    edited June 2011
    ok lets go for it
    woooooooooooo hoooooooooooo any 2 suited is the new nuts
    dragon1964 Small blind  £0.02 £0.02 £3.53
    sedgley58 Big blind  £0.04 £0.06 £3.96
      Your hole cards
    • 5
    • J
         
    STEVOSTEG Call  £0.04 £0.10 £2.92
    villaian Call  £0.04 £0.14 £3.93
    EMOSUMO Call  £0.04 £0.18 £2.27
    dragon1964 Call  £0.02 £0.20 £3.51
    sedgley58 Check     
    Flop
       
    • 10
    • K
    • 2
         
    dragon1964 Check     
    sedgley58 Check     
    STEVOSTEG Check     
    villaian Check     
    EMOSUMO Check     
    Turn
       
    • 2
         
    dragon1964 Check     
    sedgley58 Bet  £0.20 £0.40 £3.76
    STEVOSTEG Fold     
    villaian Fold     
    EMOSUMO Fold     
    dragon1964 Raise  £0.40 £0.80 £3.11
    sedgley58 Raise  £1.20 £2.00 £2.56
    dragon1964 All-in  £3.11 £5.11 £0.00
    sedgley58 Call  £2.11 £7.22 £0.45
    dragon1964 Show
    • 8
    • Q
       
    sedgley58 Show
    • 5
    • J
       
    River
       
    • 7
         
    dragon1964 Win Flush to the King £6.67  £6.67

    or perhaps its not
  • sedgley58sedgley58 Member Posts: 171
    edited June 2011
    or perhaps it is when i dont have it
    ronin8 Small blind  £0.02 £0.02 £3.78
    sedgley58 Big blind  £0.04 £0.06 £3.30
      Your hole cards
    • Q
    • K
         
    KEIGHLEY Call  £0.04 £0.10 £2.62
    SHAMROC121 Call  £0.04 £0.14 £2.30
    DRAK Call  £0.04 £0.18 £5.76
    ronin8 Call  £0.02 £0.20 £3.76
    sedgley58 Raise  £0.16 £0.36 £3.14
    KEIGHLEY Call  £0.16 £0.52 £2.46
    SHAMROC121 Call  £0.16 £0.68 £2.14
    DRAK Call  £0.16 £0.84 £5.60
    ronin8 Fold     
    Flop
       
    • 7
    • 2
    • K
         
    sedgley58 Bet  £0.84 £1.68 £2.30
    KEIGHLEY Fold     
    SHAMROC121 Call  £0.84 £2.52 £1.30
    DRAK Fold     
    Turn
       
    • 5
         
    sedgley58 Bet  £1.26 £3.78 £1.04
    SHAMROC121 All-in  £1.30 £5.08 £0.00
    sedgley58 Call  £0.04 £5.12 £1.00
    sedgley58 Show
    • Q
    • K
       
    SHAMROC121 Show
    • K
    • 5
       
    River
       
    • 6
         
    SHAMROC121 Win Two Pairs, Kings and 5s £4.73
  • sedgley58sedgley58 Member Posts: 171
    edited June 2011
    sedgley58 Small blind  £0.02 £0.02 £3.68
    danny101 Big blind  £0.04 £0.06 £0.70
      Your hole cards
    • Q
    • 8
         
    kasiayaz Call  £0.04 £0.10 £1.25
    lwchef08 Call  £0.04 £0.14 £1.83
    fisheyboy1 Call  £0.04 £0.18 £13.11
    sedgley58 Call  £0.02 £0.20 £3.66
    danny101 Check     
    Flop
       
    • 2
    • Q
    • 6
         
    sedgley58 Bet  £0.04 £0.24 £3.62
    danny101 Fold     
    kasiayaz Call  £0.04 £0.28 £1.21
    lwchef08 Fold     
    fisheyboy1 Call  £0.04 £0.32 £13.07
    Turn
       
    • 6
         
    sedgley58 Bet  £0.16 £0.48 £3.46
    kasiayaz Fold     
    fisheyboy1 Call  £0.16 £0.64 £12.91
    River
       
    • 7
         
    sedgley58 Bet  £0.32 £0.96 £3.14
    fisheyboy1 Call  £0.32 £1.28 £12.59
    sedgley58 Show
    • Q
    • 8
       
    fisheyboy1 Show
    • 9
    • 10
       
    fisheyboy1 Win Flush to the Queen £1.18
  • leon621leon621 Member Posts: 266
    edited June 2011
    ok you know you were against lucky fish in your original post and in most circumstances it will cost you more money calling than it will make you profit. I do like your question in a sence though because i often wonder if i had good enough reads on a opponent to put him on AA or KK then is it worth calling any two suited for about 5BB as most player will stack off holding this hand.
  • corn_rat22corn_rat22 Member Posts: 144
    edited June 2011
    stop limping
Sign In or Register to comment.