Just a quick one, just wondering whether this is a profitable play in a 5.50$ 2R1A latter stages
doesn't really matter about PF, all you need to know is villain has 112K and i have 187K with blinds at 1k 2K, so we're both deep.
i hold 67 of spades and have called a raise
flop 3 spades, 5 diamonds, 9 spades
villain open shoves (LOL) 104K into a 21K pot, i gave myself 17 outs, and tbf i snap called, i put him on over pair and don't think i've ever called anything as quick in my life!
is this correct mathematically etc? didnt think i could fold as that was the flop i paid to hit, the result is pointless
Comments
However, the same mathematics also apply even if the villain had just a single chip more than you but in this scenario you must fold. Why give the villain a 44% chance of beating you when you could grind him down, whereby (assuming you're the better player) he'd only have maybe a 15% chance?
This is fairly obvious (giving up a +ev play for a bigger +ev situation) but for some reason is hellishly complicated to poker players!
Why do you think we are 85% to beat any player in a tournament ? I think that seriously overestimating anyone edge in a single tournament with this stack depth