first one is so bad - villain limps in SB, and then 3-bets your raise, surely you know he's strong? but then you call his 3-bet with KJo is bad, really bad! the fact you're in position makes it slightly more bearable but still! Once you call his 3-bet, and hit top pair/gutshot, you probz have to go with it considering his and yours stacks, but i really can't see you ever being good, spewy is deffo the word here
second one is kinda standard but i'd still be betting more on flop, getting it in on turn is obv fine
In Response to Re: 2 hands. niave? spewy? too aggressive? unlucky! : why does he need to bet bigger in a 4bet pot? Prob doesnt make much difference but the sizing is fine imo Posted by grantorino
If he somehow has QJ I'd want to make him have a decision, half-pot gives him great odds, yes having QJ here is rare but it could happen if villain is stubborn.
Comments
2nd hand, i'd be looking to get it in on the flop but i'm not hating the all in
2: Fine
2) Bet bigger on flop at least £15, rest is standard.
Omfg pod m8,speeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeewy or what?
Only kiddin
Luvs ya babe xxx