You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

on line poker survey

windamonwindamon Member Posts: 219
edited July 2011 in Poker Chat
why is sky poker not in the top 50 rated on line poker sites in the uk. even a site named littlewoods poker.com is more popular.could it be because the under hand in showdowns prodominentlywin? or the fact that that paired boards are comming costantly on the flop.do we need new dealers? lol.

Comments

  • iBLUFFiBLUFF Member Posts: 1,244
    edited July 2011
    In Response to on line poker survey:
    why is sky poker not in the top 50 rated on line poker sites in the uk. even a site named littlewoods poker.com is more popular.could it be because the under hand in showdowns prodominentlywin? or the fact that that paired boards are comming costantly on the flop.do we need new dealers? lol.
    Posted by windamon
    Actually for once i agree, the paired boards thing is abit wierd it seems to happen so much. But thats poker for ya it could happen every day for a year, then the opposite next year.
  • windamonwindamon Member Posts: 219
    edited July 2011
    In Response to Re: on line poker survey:
    In Response to on line poker survey : Actually for once i agree, the paired boards thing is abit wierd it seems to happen so much. But thats poker for ya it could happen every day for a year, then the opposite next year.
    Posted by iBLUFF
    for once?
  • FlyingDaggFlyingDagg Member Posts: 4,146
    edited July 2011
    In Response to on line poker survey:
    why is sky poker not in the top 50 rated on line poker sites in the uk. even a site named littlewoods poker.com is more popular.could it be because the under hand in showdowns prodominentlywin? or the fact that that paired boards are comming costantly on the flop.do we need new dealers? lol.
    Posted by windamon
    The only site I found where Sky poker was not listed was pokerlistings.com. I looked on 3 or 4 other sites and Sky poker was in their top ten. The trouble with some of these listing sites and price comparison sites is that other sites pay a fee to get listed. I take them with a pinch of salt.
  • iBLUFFiBLUFF Member Posts: 1,244
    edited July 2011
    In Response to Re: on line poker survey:
    In Response to Re: on line poker survey : for once?
    Posted by windamon
    When someone writes a post about the rng being fixed im usually there saying no its not theres nothing wrong with the rng, however i do agree the amount of paired board is abit wierd, but i trust sky and the rng.
  • NoseyBonkNoseyBonk Member Posts: 6,186
    edited July 2011
    Dunno if Davey's links will stay (mods may not like other poker sites sub-links) but at least eight of those other sites I wouldn't even consider because they use $tupid money.
    I first came to Sky Poker because of 1) The TV coverage and 2) Good old British Isles POUNDS.



  • debdobs_67debdobs_67 Member Posts: 3,615
    edited July 2011
    Afraid i cannot possibly argue with the paired flop thing lately ,very strange xxx
  • loonytoonsloonytoons Member Posts: 4,270
    edited July 2011
    Look at what they say the main atributes of skypoker are on the link supplied by Davyzz

     Another reason they've become one of the largest UK poker sites online is because they have awesome traffic levels and weak competition.

    I reckon these are both false
  • debdobs_67debdobs_67 Member Posts: 3,615
    edited July 2011
    In Response to Re: on line poker survey:
    Look at what they say the main atributes of skypoker are on the link supplied by Davyzz   Another reason they've become one of the largest UK poker sites online is because they have awesome traffic levels and weak competition. I reckon these are both false
    Posted by loonytoons
    Agreed xx
  • Mod_MachkaMod_Machka Member Posts: 60
    edited July 2011
    Nosey was right, I had to delete your post DAVEYZZ as links to sites advertising competing poker sites aren't allowed on the forum.
Sign In or Register to comment.