Hiya all can i just clarify that on a personal level i think our 10 seater torns on here are sadly gonna be outed..
Sky have been fantastic putting these on and most poker players prefer these rather than 6 handed tables where your A 7 becomes a big hand, so only to have 6 a week i think spells the end for it,
Having played live loads of times ive only ever been on a 6 handed table when there is 6 left in the torn so find it bizzare that players on here prefer that format , maybe sky could up sng to 36 runners 6 tables of 6 then then there would be more space for 10 seaters? just an opinion sky and may i say once again ty for putting on these 10 seaters i must be in the minority on here who love them......Keep the deepstacks sky they are what poker is about!
0 ·
Comments
GERRTTCHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
B LUKKY
Rather than moan about it, how about you adjust your game to the more aggressive nature of the 6 handed format. It seems to me that most people who moan about the format/structure always come out with the phrase 'proper poker', and rather than look at their game objectively they will blame their failiures to cash on the structure.
Remember Sky is a fairly small site, with mainly UK players. Most of these players will have never played poker before, and have only experienced the Sky 6max fast blind structure way of playing. They like this format, so Sky will meet their needs.
There are plenty of sites with far greater player pools where 10 seats run all the time, I suggest you take advantage of them in the mean time.
And A7 is a big hand on a 10 seat table, depending on stacks/position.
Back to ur usual comical self i see,, cash 6 handed yes but do u play d/s live 6 handed? all i was saying if you read it PROPERLY was i hope sky dont get rid of the 10 seater format! yes its good to have different table sizes but surely sng can accomadate those , its an opinion not a moan..................
P.s I play home games 6 seated every week, but I can't even imagin playing six max in a casino, it would just seem weird.
I must personally say i prefer the 6 seater tables. Although i think that alot of the players on the site play to aggressive. When i say that i refer to a previous comment by razorkev as an example.
However i do like the odd 10 seater, however against alot of people i prefer 6 seater tournaments. I just hate it when into the latter stages you have a table of 3 and a table of 4 where as here i see a 10 seater benifitial.
However i suggest a new suggestion to counter the 6 or 10 problem. How about 8 seater tables. I play in a live tournament in a couple of local pubs and we play 8 seaters in that, and it sort of counter acts the choice problem