I've invested in a reasonable bankroll and I've been grinding NL4 for the last couple of days. Having read DOHHHHHHH's very good stratergy post I was suprised to see such a downer on c-betting as a bluff.
In my experience at this level I've been c-betting in sensible situations and most players fold. Is it about picking the right flops to c-bet. Possition doesn't seem to matter too much. rainbow flops with one paint card. Most of the time your opponent is not going to have hit these flops and if they have they will likely just flat call, giving you a free turn card which you can either hit or shut down afterwards.
Also, should I be betting when I flop a flush draw for value or should I be checking?
People say don't bluff at NL4 but as well as the maniacs there seems to be plenty of players who can fold a hand
0 ·
Comments
1: it gives you to chances to win the pot, ie they fold or you hit
2: if you play your draw weak, when you do hit it theres not much money in the pot so it will be hard to get much more money out of someone
as for cbetting, you have to choose your opponant carefully, calling stations will call you down with any pair so use this to your advantage to extract value or loose the minimum.
ive found abc poker works just fine for me at nl4
You honestly do NOT have to get fancy and play the streets at NL4 to make money, trust me !!
Trust me when I say they will call your c-bet with bottom pr and when you find these players you will
wish you had hand this time and not ace high
Essentially bluffing with no equity at NL4 is pointless, easier ways to win money then bluff FISH/STATIONS off a 64p pot.
At 4nl though just dont expect unknowns to fold a pair or a draw
AA to 72o most of the time
Seems to me you can take down some pots with a c-bet, but you can also lose as many pots for more money than you need to.
There's a lot of players won't lay down any pair or any draw, and if your c-bet gets called it's often very difficult to have any clue what hand you're up against.