You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Favourite all time hand

sikassikas Member Posts: 857
edited October 2011 in Poker Chat
post ur favourite televised hand...

mine's this Durrr vs Eastgate vs Greenstein

Comments

  • LOL_RAISELOL_RAISE Member Posts: 2,188
    edited October 2011
    for pure entertainment its gotta be hellmuth losing 3/4 times as a massive favorite vs loose cannon.


    pff that HSP hand just a fish who cant fold top pair
  • AMYBRAMYBR Member Posts: 3,432
    edited October 2011
    Negranue losing a bundle in this HSP session

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vly1Jqz4to&feature=related (2:27)

    and

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ufZ-DHVCBQ

    Also the classic Romanello:

    ww.youtube.com/watch?v=MvXep7WPzew
  • jenny_IYYjenny_IYY Member Posts: 184
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Favourite all time hand:
    post ur favourite televised hand... mine's this Durrr vs Eastgate vs Greenstein http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfP2GU74dFc
    Posted by sikas

    Gotta say that this has got to be my fav aswell. Not watched clip but it has to be durrrrrrs amazing bottle pushing bg off aces and eastgate off trips ?
  • NoseyBonkNoseyBonk Member Posts: 6,186
    edited October 2011
    Another Tom Dwan hand (vs Dodgy George), I remember being on the edge of my seat during the original transmission!

    Video

    Actually there was another edge of the seat hand in Late Night Poker this week, between Luke Schwartz and Roberto Romanello. If you saw it you'll know which one I mean!


  • AMYBRAMYBR Member Posts: 3,432
    edited October 2011
    Yeah the shwartz Romanello was good.  More watching Romanello than shwartz though, sweating it out.  Not the biggest fam of Shwartz but is good to see him pull every trick out of the bag to get there.

  • Batkin88Batkin88 Member Posts: 1,682
    edited October 2011
    The ivey dwan hand which went over a million and Ivey was so so soooooo close to calling with a pair of sixes!
    :( Would of been insane but still massively entertaining.

    Or the hand when hellmuth and some lady both go all in with aces run around the studio basically shouting i have aces i have aces with a player left to act who has kings and yet he still calls!!!
  • DrSharpDrSharp Member Posts: 1,213
    edited October 2011
    Yeah, watched Romanello v schwartz tonight on sky+, fantastic hand. How the heck he could have called is beyond me. Anyone else think it was the wrong call in that situation? How many times is he beating Romanello in that situation?
  • oynutteroynutter Member Posts: 4,773
    edited October 2011
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfG2UqS1rwQ&feature=related

    The only hand really worth watching for tactical brilliance, all the rest are pretty insignificant by comparison
  • The_Don90The_Don90 Member Posts: 9,818
    edited October 2011
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIT6NkQ9NPY my favorite although LOL Raise's suggestion a close second.
  • sikassikas Member Posts: 857
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: Favourite all time hand:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfG2UqS1rwQ&feature=related The only hand really worth watching for tactical brilliance, all the rest are pretty insignificant by comparison
    Posted by oynutter


    LOL

    THIS NEEDS MORE LOVE!

  • The_Don90The_Don90 Member Posts: 9,818
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: Favourite all time hand:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfG2UqS1rwQ&feature=related The only hand really worth watching for tactical brilliance, all the rest are pretty insignificant by comparison
    Posted by oynutter
    i still have no idea what actually happened in this hand. did they all go all in pre?
  • oynutteroynutter Member Posts: 4,773
    edited October 2011
    aye--- everybody all in pre, and only one pair of bingo wings in sight!!!!
  • The_Don90The_Don90 Member Posts: 9,818
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: Favourite all time hand:
    aye--- everybody all in pre, and only one pair of bingo wings in sight!!!!
    Posted by oynutter
    2 pairs QQ and 44
  • MohicanMohican Member Posts: 1,436
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: Favourite all time hand:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfG2UqS1rwQ&feature=related The only hand really worth watching for tactical brilliance, all the rest are pretty insignificant by comparison
    Posted by oynutter
    Even the chimps in my local pub league wouldn't get invovled with a hand like that.
  • AMYBRAMYBR Member Posts: 3,432
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: Favourite all time hand:
    Yeah, watched Romanello v schwartz tonight on sky+, fantastic hand. How the heck he could have called is beyond me. Anyone else think it was the wrong call in that situation? How many times is he beating Romanello in that situation?
    Posted by DrSharp
    I wasnt sure on this for awhile.  But its not as though shwartz doesnt narrate those concerns (and more) to himself while pondering his action.

    I do think it was a good call.  I think he simply picked up on something throughout the hand that just didnt make him a believer.

    Plus the added level that Romanello goes through to the final either way probably altered things.  I think he just sensed where he was, knew he wouldnt usually be winning, but had to take the time to confirm his read.  If Romanello had of had it, I suspect shwartz would almost auto muck river.  But as said, he must have picked up on something :p

    Only daft thing was he openly "knows" Roberto doesnt have the 3 barrel allin bluff in his toolbox lol ..... What a fish :)
  • DrSharpDrSharp Member Posts: 1,213
    edited October 2011
    In Response to Re: Favourite all time hand:
    In Response to Re: Favourite all time hand : I wasnt sure on this for awhile.  But its not as though shwartz doesnt narrate those concerns (and more) to himself while pondering his action. I do think it was a good call.  I think he simply picked up on something throughout the hand that just didnt make him a believer. Plus the added level that Romanello goes through to the final either way probably altered things.  I think he just sensed where he was, knew he wouldnt usually be winning, but had to take the time to confirm his read.  If Romanello had of had it, I suspect shwartz would almost auto muck river.  But as said, he must have picked up on something :p Only daft thing was he openly "knows" Roberto doesnt have the 3 barrel allin bluff in his toolbox lol ..... What a fish :)
    Posted by AMYBR
    Yeah, must have had a real good read. It was edge of the seat stuff. Loved it.

    There was just so much out there that beat him, great call, but against Romanello i wasnt sure he would be good enough times to justify the call. Only Schwartz will know, anyone know him? lol. Great to watch either way.

    Anyone see the hand in the Big Game on sky sports the other week with Tony G open shoving something like 68k (real money) with AA and getting called by Rob Yong with QQ (he owns DTD at Nottingham) and also by A,K? Was terrific watching the third guy with A,K trying to figure it out as Rob Yong basically told the table he had QQ which left the guy wondering what the heck Tony G would shove with.
  • murray69murray69 Member Posts: 436
    edited October 2011
Sign In or Register to comment.