You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

A bit over-optimistic, even at NL4?

PystermanPysterman Member Posts: 187
edited November 2011 in The Poker Clinic
No reads...
ELVIS Small blind  £0.02 £0.02 £2.01
Pysterman Big blind  £0.04 £0.06 £3.95
 Your hole cards
  • 9
  • K
   
tricky1234 Raise  £0.08 £0.14 £0.94
bigd351 Call  £0.08 £0.22 £3.95
good02 Fold     
BeyondAll Fold     
ELVIS Fold     
Pysterman Call  £0.04 £0.26 £3.91
Flop
  
  • Q
  • Q
  • A
   
Pysterman Check     
tricky1234 Bet  £0.04 £0.30 £0.90
bigd351 Call  £0.04 £0.34 £3.91
Pysterman Call  £0.04 £0.38 £3.87
Turn
  
  • A
   
Pysterman Check     
tricky1234 Bet  £0.04 £0.42 £0.86
bigd351 Call  £0.04 £0.46 £3.87
Pysterman Call  £0.04 £0.50 £3.83
River
  
  • 2
   
Pysterman Check     
tricky1234 All-in  £0.86 £1.36 £0.00
bigd351 Call  £0.86 £2.22 £3.01
Pysterman Call  £0.86 £3.08 £2.97

Comments

  • Dudeskin8Dudeskin8 Member Posts: 6,228
    edited November 2011
    Probably fold at every stage you have the choice to.
  • grantorinograntorino Member Posts: 4,710
    edited November 2011

    fold flop, definitely fold river

  • huuuuumehuuuuume Member Posts: 569
    edited November 2011
    wow...is that how people play?  the min bets are awesome

    if it wasnt 3 way then maybe...but we're hoping K kicker beats out 2 opponents and i just dont see how we're ever better than a chop
  • PystermanPysterman Member Posts: 187
    edited November 2011
    In Response to Re: A bit over-optimistic, even at NL4?:
    wow...is that how people play?  the min bets are awesome if it wasnt 3 way then maybe...but we're hoping K kicker beats out 2 opponents and i just dont see how we're ever better than a chop
    Posted by huuuuume
    Yes, ordinarily I would be folding this hand to any reasonable bet, but they're just letting me in so cheaply I feel I have to call as I could actually be ahead with K high if they are chasing the flush.

    With no proper betting, I had no reason to put my opponents on an A or Q (especially with 2 aces and 2 queens on the board), so I figured I may actually be winning at the end, or at least chopping with one of the opponents. Hence the call, which I admit was a little optimistic given the 3 spades on board also.
  • waynecwaynec Member Posts: 1,023
    edited November 2011
    In Response to Re: A bit over-optimistic, even at NL4?:
    In Response to Re: A bit over-optimistic, even at NL4? : Yes, ordinarily I would be folding this hand to any reasonable bet, but they're just letting me in so cheaply I feel I have to call as I could actually be ahead with K high if they are chasing the flush. With no proper betting, I had no reason to put my opponents on an A or Q (especially with 2 aces and 2 queens on the board), so I figured I may actually be winning at the end, or at least chopping with one of the opponents. Hence the call, which I admit was a little optimistic given the 3 spades on board also.
    Posted by Pysterman
    you have to think one of them has it.... maybe the guy who is betting small.... BECAUSE HE DONT WANT YOU TO FOLD!!!!!!
Sign In or Register to comment.