First book I've read on poker and I found it an interesting read but there were a lot of things that he sugest that I found supprising?
for example. open limpping with hands like KJ/QJ/KQ and calling other players who have limped in early possition with suited connectors and Ax suited. Not playing TPTK hands agressively, folding bottom set! folding small pocket pairs pre-flop
The suggested style of play seemed super-conservitive and seemed to advocate only playing for full stacks when you have the nuts.
I'm playing at NL8 at the moment so I don't know how bigger levels really play but is this really how it's played? I thought higher levels were all about wide 3-bet ranges and double-barrelled floats out of possition and the dreaded tripple-range-merging! Is it a case of read other books too and play a combination of styles.
Have I been playing too much NL4 where TPTK and any set is the nutz and it's "get your whole stack in for value" time whenever you flop such a hand?
0 ·
Comments
Funnily though did the quiz for a particular site that gives you $50 a while back. You have to do a 20Q quiz prior to it though. Surprisingly I was shocked by much of the answers. Answers being sourced from in house material. Had to say didnt agree with much of it. Many people I know felt the same.
That being said, I'm a big time losing online player
Havent read it, just out of interest are the hands 6max?
His tournament books advocate too much limping for my liking, certainly isnt aggressive enough for 6max online 50NL up. However the way he describes the thinking through a hand evaluating all the info is excellent imo, and if you are a newish online microstakes cash player that would certainly help your game
google fees 6max for a good read on online cash games
In general though as stated by others training sites, vids, online forums are better than books for online cash