Is my thinking wrong here but I thought that in cash, if you're bankrolled properly, then you can play these marginal edges because you will win long term.
For instance if I'm heads up and the other guy shoves, I have QQ and hypnothetically I know for a fact he 100% has AK then I'm gonna call that 1000 times in a row, because that marginal edge will be profitable long term.
So surely if it's +EV and you're bankrolled correctly then it's always good (assuming it's the most +EV way of playing it)
Is my thinking wrong here but I thought that in cash, if you're bankrolled properly, then you can play these marginal edges because you will win long term. For instance if I'm heads up and the other guy shoves, I have QQ and hypnothetically I know for a fact he 100% has AK then I'm gonna call that 1000 times in a row, because that marginal edge will be profitable long term. So surely if it's +EV and you're bankrolled correctly then it's always good (assuming it's the most +EV way of playing it) Posted by Lambert180
This is what the question is. At a glance I think shoving is prob marginally profitable but I think calling is prob going to be more profitable in this spot, given that raising prob wont acheive anything we want it to. Havent done any numbers or anything so could be wrong
Its a bit like saying openshoving AA 100bb deep is good because its +EV. Obv this situation is far less clearcut, but you look for the line which maximises your EV
Comments
For instance if I'm heads up and the other guy shoves, I have QQ and hypnothetically I know for a fact he 100% has AK then I'm gonna call that 1000 times in a row, because that marginal edge will be profitable long term.
So surely if it's +EV and you're bankrolled correctly then it's always good (assuming it's the most +EV way of playing it)
Its a bit like saying openshoving AA 100bb deep is good because its +EV. Obv this situation is far less clearcut, but you look for the line which maximises your EV