You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Remove other players names when posting your hand? Yes/No

RichiSwiftRichiSwift Member Posts: 149
edited October 2009 in Poker Chat
I saw someone mention about this earlier on a thread. Good point I thought.
So, I thought we could have a little vote on it. Also by making a main thread about it gets all involved easier.

Comments

  • loonytoonsloonytoons Member Posts: 4,270
    edited October 2009
    only if its my name and ive been daft, all other players should be open to ridicule.
  • Hale72Hale72 Member Posts: 1,000
    edited October 2009
    I feel removing players name is an absolute must,

    Purely out of courtesy and consideration for the other players on the table.
  • Kiwini4uKiwini4u Member Posts: 3,830
    edited October 2009
    I voted yes but I think that maybe it depends on the type of post thats made. 

    If its a "could I have got off this hand" type of post where for example the player with KK has been beaten by AA and is asking for advise about the hand then I don't see a problem with both players names being shown.  But if its a "How could they call with THAT hand" type of post them I do think that the "villians" name should be changed.
  • KaidusKaidus Member Posts: 159
    edited October 2009
    No, for a few reasons:

    1. If it's a post where a player has played badly, then I want to know the usernames of these players so I can target them, easy money innit?

    2. If it's a post about me, I want to be able to see where I've gone wrong because I might not remember the hand afterwards, but someone else might put it up for me.

    Anyone who can't take criticism shouldn't play poker, IMO.

    As for people who post ridiculous rants when they don't need to, either have a designated thread for them or delete their posts. We're grown up people, surely we can take the risk of maybe, just maybe, having something criticised...
  • Dudeskin8Dudeskin8 Member Posts: 6,228
    edited October 2009
    I'm fine with having my name on them, if you get advice from others that's only a good thing.
  • BuistyboyBuistyboy Member Posts: 408
    edited October 2009
    i've voted yes on this one... names in my opinion should be removed.


    Steve is right in saying that the context of the post is important, but to keep it simple and to ensure no one can be upset at being named, a simple rule of removing names takes care of it.

    Dont really agree with you kaidus, it is unfair to say that someone who does not like receiving criticism should not play poker  If a player asks for constructive criticism then fine, but if someone doesnt want it, they shouldnt need to hear it.  If you are up against a player you perceive as weaker, do not criticise them. Just take their chips or money quietly.

    Poker is a social game that should be fun to play.

    Ray
  • KaidusKaidus Member Posts: 159
    edited October 2009
    Re-reading my post, I may have come across a bit hard.

    However, I also feel that names are good for another reason, namely that if you are playing against a reg, you can then get opinions from other people that have played against the reg and will have a read on that player. One thing that can affect strategy posts is the lack of reads in that situation, which can be important, and the more information we have as players, the better imo.
  • nirvana29nirvana29 Member Posts: 489
    edited October 2009
    dont really have a preference
  • FlashFlushFlashFlush Member Posts: 4,494
    edited October 2009
    no... people have played the hand if they are ashamed to see there play, they shudn't of done it
  • MICKYBLUEMICKYBLUE Member Posts: 2,035
    edited October 2009
    no defo no, ill debate any hand i play, good or bad not a problem
  • silentbobsilentbob Member Posts: 2,137
    edited October 2009
    No for me. fwiw, I completely agree with FlashFlush
  • margatemafmargatemaf Member Posts: 849
    edited October 2009
    In Response to Re: Remove other players names when posting your hand? Yes/No:
    I feel removing players name is an absolute must, Purely out of courtesy and consideration for the other players on the table.
    Posted by Hale72
    completely agree with this post! courtesy and consideration a must :)
  • BADBOY985BADBOY985 Member Posts: 1,957
    edited October 2009
    I THINK ITS OKAY TO PUT NAMES IF AS LONG AS YOUR NOT BEING ABUSIVE ABOUT THEM. IF SOME ONE WANTS TO KNOW WHY A PLAYER MADE A CALL THERE EXPLANATION MAY BE HELPFUL.BY READING THESE EXPLANATION POST I HAVE LEARNT QUITE A LOT.
  • LadyFingrsLadyFingrs Member Posts: 613
    edited October 2009
    People that get mad because people posted their reads on them aren't really seeing the benefit of knowing how other reg's percieve you.


  • darichdarich Member Posts: 969
    edited October 2009
    No problem with it if it's disccusing a hand - not good if it's a "what a w****r this guy was" type thread - so wouldn't want a blanket ban
  • BuistyboyBuistyboy Member Posts: 408
    edited October 2009
    what is sky pokers position on this matter then? They regulate the forum so i suppose they can give the definitive answer.
  • TalonTalon Member Posts: 1,621
    edited October 2009
      For me it depends on the nature of the hand in question. If a person posts a hand where they have been thouroughly outplayed and is asking advice on how they could have played it better, then the other players are being lauded and their names should stay because they have done well.   But if it is a post where the player is being criticised for the cards they play, how they play them or for dishing out a bad beat on the "hero", then there names should not be used because it is just whinging on the part of the poster and other players should not be dragged down this level.
Sign In or Register to comment.