You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

typical hand :)

2»

Comments

  • SJspanky1SJspanky1 Member Posts: 620
    edited February 2012
    In Response to Re: typical sky hand :):
    16 by my counting, anymore guesses?
    Posted by CrazyBen23
    Sarcasm Ben? Tut tut
  • CrazyBen23CrazyBen23 Member Posts: 865
    edited February 2012
    Counted the king and nine of diamonds lol i fail so badly
  • CrazyBen23CrazyBen23 Member Posts: 865
    edited February 2012
    And yer, no one is ever folding his draw, nice donk pot betting of every street lol
  • Poker_FailPoker_Fail Member Posts: 1,755
    edited February 2012
    In Response to Re: typical sky hand :):
    9 diamonds, 3 kings on flop 9 diamonds, 3 kings, 3 nines on turn. 15 outs, can't count the king/nine of diamonds twice ;)
    Posted by NColley

    *Facepalm* CrazyBen's fault!  got it right the first time : )
  • djblacke04djblacke04 Member Posts: 1,778
    edited February 2012
    In Response to Re: typical sky hand :):
    9 diamonds, 3 kings on flop 9 diamonds, 3 kings, 3 nines on turn. 15 outs, can't count the king/nine of diamonds twice ;)
    Posted by NColley

    does nt he have 8 diamond outs  as there are 5 in play?

    +3 kings +3 9s?


    i make that 14

    :)
  • NColleyNColley Member Posts: 1,178
    edited February 2012
    unless you are a superuser you don't know that your opponent has 1 diamond in his hand..
  • djblacke04djblacke04 Member Posts: 1,778
    edited February 2012
    In Response to Re: typical hand :):
    unless you are a superuser you don't know that your opponent has 1 diamond in his hand..
    Posted by NColley

    doesnt matter ,you are calculating odds based on the known factors... as the hand has been played you can quite clearly see...
  • NColleyNColley Member Posts: 1,178
    edited February 2012
    In Response to Re: typical hand :):
    In Response to Re: typical hand :) : doesnt matter ,you are calculating odds based on the known factors... as the hand has been played you can quite clearly see...
    Posted by djblacke04
    lol... your thinking is flawed in so many ways with this post.
  • Poker_FailPoker_Fail Member Posts: 1,755
    edited February 2012
    In Response to Re: typical hand :):
    In Response to Re: typical hand :) : doesnt matter ,you are calculating odds based on the known factors... as the hand has been played you can quite clearly see...
    Posted by djblacke04
    When you are in the hand you don't know oppo has the Ad, he has to assume he has 15 outs
  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH Member Posts: 17,929
    edited February 2012
    In Response to Re: typical hand :):
    In Response to Re: typical hand :) : lol... your thinking is flawed in so many ways with this post.
    Posted by NColley
    and most others he posts ;)
  • SJspanky1SJspanky1 Member Posts: 620
    edited February 2012
    In Response to Re: typical hand :):
    In Response to Re: typical hand :) : doesnt matter ,you are calculating odds based on the known factors... as the hand has been played you can quite clearly see...
    Posted by djblacke04
    Please tell me this is a joke......
Sign In or Register to comment.