+1 I hate stretchy tables though, mini view is so much better..... Will the 'mini view' tab/option still be there on the new tables? Don't wanna have to mess about getting all tables the same size etc manually when clicking mini view does it automatically for you.......... Posted by DOHHHHHHH
I think when you stretch it down to a certain size it will switch to the mini view mode. Don't know about the mini view mode still being there. I'd imagine so.
I don't reckon there are any improvements. We have been told they are coming since before the first UKOPS. Since then the only software tweak has been to add in the advertising whilst we are playing. Nothing new that improves the game play for customers, just a few tweaks to get more cash from us. Instead of spending the budget on a studio that looks remarkably similar to the last, maybe they should have sorted out the software first. I'll probably get shot down by the guard dogs of Sky Poker again, but if no-one says it, then it won't get said.lol
I don't reckon there are any improvements. We have been told they are coming since before the first UKOPS. Since then the only software tweak has been to add in the advertising whilst we are playing. Nothing new that improves the game play for customers, just a few tweaks to get more cash from us. Instead of spending the budget on a studio that looks remarkably similar to the last, maybe they should have sorted out the software first. I'll probably get shot down by the guard dogs of Sky Poker again, but if no-one says it, then it won't get said.lol Posted by shaun84
shame on you shaun, they have changed a sofa,, they are not cheap
People have seen and tested out some of the new updates at SPT's. You do realise how much backend testing any software updates will need to go through don't you ? I'm sure you would all be the first to complain if they rushed the updates out and the whole lot went pear shaped. Posted by AcidMan27
Can I just point out that Acidman27 is not a Guard Dog of Sky Poker... or indeed any form of Guard Dog :O)
The above may not be true as I have never met the gentleman.... or gentledog...as the case may be ;o)
People have seen and tested out some of the new updates at SPT's. You do realise how much backend testing any software updates will need to go through don't you ? I'm sure you would all be the first to complain if they rushed the updates out and the whole lot went pear shaped. Posted by AcidMan27
I have no problem with people getting all their ducks in a row before going live. My only complaint, if you had read my post correctly, was that the Software Improvements were announced before the FIRST UKOPS. Why if you know there is backend testing to be done would you announce that it is coming. I'll announce that my hotel on Mars is opening soon, I just have loads of rocket testing to do first.lol
In Response to Re: Sky's Software Improvements : I have no problem with people getting all their ducks in a row before going live. My only complaint, if you had read my post correctly, was that the Software Improvements were announced before the FIRST UKOPS. Why if you know there is backend testing to be done would you announce that it is coming. I'll announce that my hotel on Mars is opening soon, I just have loads of rocket testing to do first.lol Posted by shaun84
Since when did they say which changes would be coming when ?
They said some changes are coming and some have been implemented already. Others like the resizable tables have always been forthcoming with no set date as far as i'm aware.
Alot of work will go into any updates and for a site that's not got as many techies working on it as say one of the big sites it's bound to take longer for such overhauls to take place.
In Response to Re: Sky's Software Improvements : Can I just point out that Acidman27 is not a Guard Dog of Sky Poker... or indeed any form of Guard Dog :O) The above may not be true as I have never met the gentleman.... or gentledog...as the case may be ;o) Posted by JockBMW
It did come out a bit angry didn't it.
I didn't mean it to read like that but having said that I have to deal with things like this daily.
People want everything this minute and then complain when it doesn't work properly. Have a little patience.
In Response to Re: Sky's Software Improvements : It did come out a bit angry didn't it. I didn't mean it to read like that but having said that I have to deal with things like this daily. People want everything this minute and then complain when it doesn't work properly. Have a little patience. Posted by AcidMan27
Sorry Acidman, I wasn't trying to imply that you were coming across angry, just making a wee joke about it not being s Sky Suit that had replied.
I thought you're reply came across very well especially to non techie peeps, like me ;o)
It's not all about the tables... The software needs to become lighter also...
I am mainly a cash player that's why I am concentrating on resizable tables... I don't know what tour players would like to see improved in the software...
I could be wrong but I'm gonna say it's VERY unlikely that Tikay would have given a definitive date for when the resizeable tables would be here when he's an intelligent man and knows a million and one things can happen between now and then.
Just did a quick test and using the download client. I opened 4 fully seated 6-max cash tables and it used a pretty constant 15% CPU, 400MB of real memory and 600MB of virtual memory. Then using Firefox 10. I opened 4 fully seated 6-max cash tables and it fluctuated between 15% and 24% CPU, 470MB of real memory and 870MB of virtual memory. Posted by Machka
zzzzzzzzz and?
I dont understand any of this or the implications but thanks anyway...
Just did a quick test and using the download client. I opened 4 fully seated 6-max cash tables and it used a pretty constant 15% CPU, 400MB of real memory and 600MB of virtual memory. Then using Firefox 10. I opened 4 fully seated 6-max cash tables and it fluctuated between 15% and 24% CPU, 470MB of real memory and 870MB of virtual memory. Posted by Machka
That's unlikely to change dramatically with any new software updates unless they start again from scratch. It will still likely to be using flash and it's pretty resource heavy for most things. An option to cut back on animations would be a nice option to cut CPU usage but it's still going to be a memory hog.
In Response to Re: Sky's Software Improvements : It did come out a bit angry didn't it. I didn't mean it to read like that but having said that I have to deal with things like this daily. People want everything this minute and then complain when it doesn't work properly. Have a little patience. Posted by AcidMan27
The problem is: people have been been asking for these things for over a year... We have a right to be impatient.
In Response to Re: Sky's Software Improvements : That's unlikely to change dramatically with any new software updates unless they start again from scratch. It will still likely to be using flash and it's pretty resource heavy for most things. An option to cut back on animations would be a nice option to cut CPU usage but it's still going to be a memory hog. Posted by cgoldie
Comments
You do realise how much backend testing any software updates will need to go through don't you ?
I'm sure you would all be the first to complain if they rushed the updates out and the whole lot went pear shaped.
Since when did they say which changes would be coming when ?
They said some changes are coming and some have been implemented already. Others like the resizable tables have always been forthcoming with no set date as far as i'm aware.
Alot of work will go into any updates and for a site that's not got as many techies working on it as say one of the big sites it's bound to take longer for such overhauls to take place.
It did come out a bit angry didn't it.
I didn't mean it to read like that but having said that I have to deal with things like this daily.
People want everything this minute and then complain when it doesn't work properly. Have a little patience.
I opened 4 fully seated 6-max cash tables and it used a pretty constant 15% CPU, 400MB of real memory and 600MB of virtual memory.
Then using Firefox 10.
I opened 4 fully seated 6-max cash tables and it fluctuated between 15% and 24% CPU, 470MB of real memory and 870MB of virtual memory.
I dont understand any of this or the implications but thanks anyway...
It's not.