You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Value bet or not to value bet

rancidrancid Member Posts: 5,945
edited April 2012 in The Poker Clinic
Intrested in your views

PlayerActionCardsAmountPotBalance
PJ122 Small blind   400.00 400.00 29031.25
leefish05 Big blind   800.00 1200.00 16355.00
  Your hole cards
  • K
  • K
     
TIPTOPTIM Fold        
macapaca Raise   1600.00 2800.00 35807.50
rancid Raise   4000.00 6800.00 40465.75
deanom1245 Fold        
PJ122 Fold        
leefish05 Fold        
macapaca Call   2400.00 9200.00 33407.50
Flop
   
  • A
  • J
  • Q
     
macapaca Check        
rancid Check        
Turn
   
  • 6
     
macapaca Check        
rancid Check        
River
   
  • K
     
macapaca Check        
rancid                ?

Comments

  • percival09percival09 Member Posts: 3,804
    edited March 2012
    I check back
  • BorinLonerBorinLoner Member Posts: 3,863
    edited March 2012
    It's surely not a value bet if you only get called by better. You might bet it to get him off a ten or a weak flush though.
  • EvilPinguEvilPingu Member Posts: 3,462
    edited March 2012
    Been staring at this hand history for 25 minutes, typing stuff, deleting stuff, and deciding what to post... With 15 seconds to act, I probably check it back.

    I'm off to bed, will think about this tomorrow and probably post again, I'm watching this thread with interest :)
  • pod1pod1 Member Posts: 4,377
    edited March 2012
    not for me mate
  • AMYBRAMYBR Member Posts: 3,432
    edited March 2012
    No.

    Amusingly if Kd doesnt come off I do for sure.
  • Dudeskin8Dudeskin8 Member Posts: 6,228
    edited March 2012
    Got to be check, as can't see what worse can call on 4 to flush and a 10 making broadway....
  • Donut64Donut64 Member Posts: 2,666
    edited March 2012
     If you bet here you need to turn your hand into a bluff hoping to get rid of a striaght or a small flush or just accept the showdown value in your hand.
     In this situation the decision you make is not about the cards in your hand but about what you know about your opposition!
     If he is a doubting Thomas he may call you with an ace but will also call with a 10 or any diamond so not worth the risk.
  • grantorinograntorino Member Posts: 4,710
    edited March 2012
    bet 4 value from 2 pairz
  • rancidrancid Member Posts: 5,945
    edited March 2012
    In Response to Re: Value bet or not to value bet:
    bet 4 value from 2 pairz
    Posted by grantorino

    This was my thinking afterwards, surely I can b/f this spot - 2 prs/sets call 3600 or something - 3 bet pot - surely range smashes that flop and run out - thought oppo had under pair to board with possible diamond -  hence the check on end

    How about betting turn

    thin value all over but oppo is never checking flushes/10's on river - emmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

    I am obviously not betting big value but sure I can eeek out thin value from hands I beat
  • AMYBRAMYBR Member Posts: 3,432
    edited March 2012
    We are assuming a 2pr hand is bad enough to call?

    Just totally going to level self if we get cr'd river.  I dont really see any point in going for thin value on end.

    (unless we know we are bluffing)
  • SkyPokerTVSkyPokerTV Member Posts: 185
    edited April 2012

    Hi,

    Thank you for your post, if you would like us to show your hand on tomorrows Poker Clinic show with Anna and Ryan, please let us know  the hand ID and the table its from as we can only show tables with the TV icon.

    All the best

    TV Team

  • The_Don90The_Don90 Member Posts: 9,814
    edited April 2012
    I defo aint value betting the river here v most opponents. However against some ill maybe b/f half the pot. Unfortunetly i think alot of clever people may c/r a semi decent hand here, which concludes to me we cant call so we have to therefore check back.

    However i am 100% betting the turn. Our opponent has now checked two streets to us on a board which smashed our range. I might even c-bet the flop purley becaue that board smashed our range. By checking i think we show we have KK/TT
  • EvilPinguEvilPingu Member Posts: 3,462
    edited April 2012
    After 4 days, I have decided that I would go for a bet/fold here... If only you could actually do that at the table, tank forever while everyone else goes out, easiest final table ever FTW?

    In this spot, betting polarises our range - we should either have a flush which we're getting value from, or we have nothing and are bluffing as it's the only way we can win the pot. We're expected to check back hands such as straights, or this one where we have showdown value but very little value in betting. If our opponent thinks we're capable of bluffing here, then I think there's thin value all over this board as we can get called by worse bluff catching hands.

    Equally, if our opponent thinks we are only ever betting this spot with the flush, we can get straights to fold, and as it's been checked on all 3 streets, our opponent may have an underpair with a diamond which we can fold out by betting, too.

    I'm betting 2,400ish and folding to a re-raise.
  • rancidrancid Member Posts: 5,945
    edited April 2012
    In Response to Re: Value bet or not to value bet:
    I defo aint value betting the river here v most opponents. However against some ill maybe b/f half the pot. Unfortunetly i think alot of clever people may c/r a semi decent hand here, which concludes to me we cant call so we have to therefore check back. However i am 100% betting the turn. Our opponent has now checked two streets to us on a board which smashed our range. I might even c-bet the flop purley becaue that board smashed our range. By checking i think we show we have KK/TT
    Posted by The_Don90
    What hands can we get calls from on the flop or turn that we beat in a 3 bet pot
  • rancidrancid Member Posts: 5,945
    edited April 2012
    In Response to Re: Value bet or not to value bet:
    After 4 days, I have decided that I would go for a bet/fold here... If only you could actually do that at the table, tank forever while everyone else goes out, easiest final table ever FTW? In this spot, betting polarises our range - we should either have a flush which we're getting value from, or we have nothing and are bluffing as it's the only way we can win the pot. We're expected to check back hands such as straights, or this one where we have showdown value but very little value in betting. If our opponent thinks we're capable of bluffing here, then I think there's thin value all over this board as we can get called by worse bluff catching hands. Equally, if our opponent thinks we are only ever betting this spot with the flush, we can get straights to fold, and as it's been checked on all 3 streets, our opponent may have an underpair with a diamond which we can fold out by betting, too. I'm betting 2,400ish and folding to a re-raise.
    Posted by EvilPingu
    Kinda agree we can do a polarised bet on the river where oppo can only raise with better but only call with worse but the only problem is oppo can also call with a 10 where they will not raise
    If we bear in mind that oppo can call with a 10 it turns our b/f into a smaller amount imo - like you say 2400 or something
    Obviously betting smaller brings along the obvious fact that oppo if capable enough will raise with better and with bluffs

    If you think oppo is not capable of raising with a bluff then b/f becomes easier and the only other question is - should we b/f more - 3500 or something - how likely is it that oppo as a ten in a 3 bet pot - mmmmmmm - poker

    Another consideration is, if you think oppo is capable of raising with bluffs here, then we should indeed consider b/c 2400 )
Sign In or Register to comment.