You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Stacking off with AK readless 100bb deep

EvilPinguEvilPingu Member Posts: 3,462
edited April 2012 in The Poker Clinic
Just had this hand at 50NL and was wondering what people's thoughts are generally on getting 100bb in with AK pre-flop when you've only just sat down at the table with a player you've never played against before?

Am I going to be behind most of the time (as is the case in example below), or am I going to be against AQ (or worse) enough of the time for this to be the correct play?

PlayerActionCardsAmountPotBalance
EvilPinguSmall blind £0.25£0.25£49.45
scotty77Big blind £0.50£0.75£64.18
 Your hole cards
  • A
  • K
   
britrockFold    
NOMADICUSRaise £1.50£2.25£40.03
huuuuumeFold    
RYAN1389Call £1.50£3.75£21.27
EvilPinguRaise £5.75£9.50£43.70
scotty77Fold    
NOMADICUSRaise £18.00£27.50£22.03
RYAN1389Fold    
EvilPinguAll-in £43.70£71.20£0.00
NOMADICUSAll-in £22.03£93.23£0.00
EvilPinguUnmatched bet £8.17£85.06£8.17
EvilPinguShow
  • A
  • K
   
NOMADICUSShow
  • K
  • K
   
Flop
  
  • A
  • 10
  • 2
   
Turn
  
  • Q
   
River
  
  • 7
   
EvilPinguWinPair of Aces£83.26 £91.43


Comments

  • devonfish5devonfish5 Member Posts: 4,291
    edited April 2012
    hi evil,
    think u will be behind to kk or aa some of the time,as here.
    also,any pair u r flipping.
    not very often r u going 2 b in good shape imo.
    i fold and look 4 a better spot
    :-)
    devon
  • SJspanky1SJspanky1 Member Posts: 620
    edited April 2012
    Completely and utterly player dependent.

    With no history with villain and having just sat down I can understand your willingness to go for an early double up.

    In my experience of this level though and with villain re-popping your substantial 3bet you ain't gonna be up against AQ or worse here very often.
  • KKripplerKKrippler Member Posts: 321
    edited April 2012
    In Response to Re: Stacking off with AK readless 100bb deep:
    Completely and utterly player dependent. With no history with villain and having just sat down I can understand your willingness to go for an early double up. In my experience of this level though and with villain re-popping your substantial 3bet you ain't gonna be up against AQ or worse here very often.
    Posted by SJspanky1
    +1, readless I am probably folding, so few/no hands oppo is 4 betting with that ur beating. 

    Also the size of his 4 bet is so big he's never reraise folding( some ppl like to 4 bet with air).
  • grantorinograntorino Member Posts: 4,710
    edited April 2012
    I think you would need a read to fold once you 3bet the guy
  • huuuuumehuuuuume Member Posts: 569
    edited April 2012

    player dependent but without passing any comment on villain i think this spot is marginal at best

    dont think he ever takes this line with AQ, AJ and JJ so probably a fold in this spot as you're only ever getting it in against QQ+ imo.

  • jugglegeekjugglegeek Member Posts: 623
    edited April 2012
    Are we making the assumption that this is never ever a 4-bet bluff? I'd have thought at NL50 3-bet sqeezes from the blinds against a middle-possition raise and a call from the button were fairly common. Think readless it's fine to 5-bet shove with AK from the small blind. If you aren't happy to go AIPF then don't 3-bet in the first place.
Sign In or Register to comment.