I think that maybe its time to let this issue die down for a while, none of us truly know exactly why Mick's ban was increased from three months to a lifetime one. Maybe he did something else wrong or maybe its a genuine mistake by the Sky team, but because of the comments made here in support of Mick they feel they can't back down incase people on the forum start gloating that they beat the them into submission.
I can understand Bernies comment that they can't discuss individual cases on the forum, afterall I certainly wouldnt want my personal business discussed here by a third party, I dont think any of us would.
I dont know if such a thing exists but, if this problem is something that happens a lot, maybe some thought could be given to setting up an independent body, much like ACAS, who can sit down with both partys and try to settle the dispute.
Whatever happens I think we all agree that this is a excellent site and I for one wouldn't want this issue to bring an end to the excellent fun we all have here both on the tables and in the forums.
I hope that I have tried to be the voice of moderation here and thank you for listening
if hes got a lifetime ban then it is for a reason, simples. lets move on this subject is having a very big negative effect on the forum Posted by webby234
if hes got a lifetime ban then it is for a reason, simples. lets move on this subject is having a very big negative effect on the forum Posted by webby234
so wat yer sayin is......you dont want to talk about it coz its draggin u down .......lololololololol......i think if anyone want to comment on this thread its up to them......
In Response to Re: MickJenn Lifetime Ban? : so wat yer sayin is......you dont want to talk about it coz its draggin u down .......lololololololol......i think if anyone want to comment on this thread its up to them...... Posted by zxghostxz
people can comment when ever they want but how many topics are we gonna have with the same old questions over and over again, if sky say hes chat banned then hes chat banned, no matter how many threads you guys make up trying to back sky into a corner its not gonna work, and its not just dragging me down its having a negative impact on the forum in my opinion!
if hes got a lifetime ban then it is for a reason, simples. lets move on this subject is having a very big negative effect on the forum Posted by webby234
MOST OF US,ON THIS FORUM,THINK THAT YOUR HAND HISTORYS ,AND CONSTANT BAD BEAT THREADS, HAVE A MORE NEGATIVE EFFECT ON THIS FORUM WEBBY,I FOR ONE HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF UR WHINGING ,BUT I DONT COME ON YOUR THREADS AND TELL U SO .......I JUST IGNORE U ,UVE BECOME PRETTY DEPRESSING IN RECENT WEEKS, BOMBARDING THE FORUM WITH YOUR, OMG LOOK WHATS HAPPENED TO ME TONIGHT THREADS,MAYBE YOU SHOULD TAKE A LONG HARD LOOK AT YOURSELF ,BEFORE YOU COME ON HERE AND POST NEGATIVE COMMENTS ON ISSUES THAT DONT CONCERN YOU...........
In Response to Re: MickJenn Lifetime Ban? : MOST OF US,ON THIS FORUM,THINK THAT YOUR HAND HISTORYS ,AND CONSTANT BAD BEAT THREADS, HAVE A MORE NEGATIVE EFFECT ON THIS FORUM WEBBY,I FOR ONE HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF UR WHINGING ,BUT I DONT COME ON YOUR THREADS AND TELL U SO .......I JUST IGNORE U ,UVE BECOME PRETTY DEPRESSING IN RECENT WEEKS, BOMBARDING THE FORUM WITH YOUR, OMG LOOK WHATS HAPPENED TO ME TONIGHT THREADS,MAYBE YOU SHOULD TAKE A LONG HARD LOOK AT YOURSELF ,BEFORE YOU COME ON HERE AND POST NEGATIVE COMMENTS ON ISSUES THAT DONT CONCERN YOU........... Posted by TENOFSPADE
you go tell him ten...... he's just trying to get he's post count up just to get in the freeroll sado!!!
I don't know what Mick has done, and i don't need to, neither do i know him.I think this is about sky poker's integrity, as much as the ban itself. He's obviously a popular guy, so maybe an explanation might clear all this up.
Comments
I think that maybe its time to let this issue die down for a while, none of us truly know exactly why Mick's ban was increased from three months to a lifetime one. Maybe he did something else wrong or maybe its a genuine mistake by the Sky team, but because of the comments made here in support of Mick they feel they can't back down incase people on the forum start gloating that they beat the them into submission.
I can understand Bernies comment that they can't discuss individual cases on the forum, afterall I certainly wouldnt want my personal business discussed here by a third party, I dont think any of us would.
I dont know if such a thing exists but, if this problem is something that happens a lot, maybe some thought could be given to setting up an independent body, much like ACAS, who can sit down with both partys and try to settle the dispute.
Whatever happens I think we all agree that this is a excellent site and I for one wouldn't want this issue to bring an end to the excellent fun we all have here both on the tables and in the forums.
I hope that I have tried to be the voice of moderation here and thank you for listening
Steve
lets move on this subject is having a very big negative effect on the forum
Top bloke mick who i have had a lot of laughs with in the past !!
Curiosity killed the cat, lol.
x
He then got a life ban from the forum.
It then appears that the 3 month table chat ban was extended to life.
And he wears very bright shirts! If he comes back we need shades
2) How can you make that judgement if you do not know why he lost his Chat-Privileges?
x