In Response to Re: IS THIS CONSIDERED SLOWROLLING? I DONT THINK SO BUT OTHERS DID : Doesn't matter when we have committed so much already. Posted by AcidMan27
AS OP SAID QUITE DEEP IN TOURNIE PLAYER SHOVES, WHAT HAS THERE TABLE IMAGE BEEN ?? IT`S YOUR TOURNIE ON LINE, AS MOST/ALL SAY`S RATHER BE SHOVER THAN CALLER !
In Response to Re: IS THIS CONSIDERED SLOWROLLING? I DONT THINK SO BUT OTHERS DID : AS OP SAID QUITE DEEP IN TOURNIE PLAYER SHOVES, WHAT HAS THERE TABLE IMAGE BEEN ?? IT`S YOUR TOURNIE ON LINE, AS MOST/ALL SAY`S RATHER BE SHOVER THAN CALLER ! Posted by spornybol
You're completely missing the mathematics of the situation. If the OP didn't want to call a shove by one of the smaller stacks he shouldn't have 3bet so big.
With the ammount now in the pot that we can win because their range isn't just KK/AA then we have to call.
Comments
Unlike others here, I don't think it's a snap call, it needed some thought, but 5 minutes, a bit much.
With the ammount now in the pot that we can win because their range isn't just KK/AA then we have to call.
Its just a nit roll, simple.