Any observations on my Sharkscope Graphs? All the superstars on here must have an opinion.lol

shaun84

This is my Sky Poker Sharkscope Graph for Scheduled Tournies.

shaun84

www.sharkscope.com/SharkScope/DisplayGraph?GraphType=UserHistory&u1=shaun84&Network=sky&Username=sswebsite&Password=&Currency=USD&TimeZone=8&ClientTimeZoneValue=UTC+0100&searchTag=631.663436463506&GraphWidth=540&GraphHeight=420&nocache=1334337526705&version=356&DecimalSeparator=.&Filter= Sch. Only&GeneralSearchType=SCHO" alt="" width="540" height="420" />

Here it is

shaun84

This is my graph from a different site.

www.sharkscope.com/SharkScope/DisplayGraph?GraphType=UserHistory&u1=YouShouldFoldNow&Network=ipoker&Username=sswebsite&Password=&Currency=USD&TimeZone=8&ClientTimeZoneValue=UTC+0100&searchTag=631.663436463506&GraphWidth=540&GraphHeight=420&nocache=1334337789092&version=356&DecimalSeparator=." alt="" width="540" height="420" />

shaun84

My ROI isn't bad on either and my ROI on the other site is surprisingly big but my downswing on both is incredible. I did stop playing the other one a while ago so the downswings aren't as co-ordinated as they may seem. I know it will be hard to make an observation based solely on Sharkscope graphs but if you have any questions to supplement the graphs then I'll gladly answer them. My Sky graph is slightly missleading as I have satellited into 4x £110 buy in tournies for £5ish and 1x £220 buy-in for £24 so I am still marginally in profit on here with those taken into account.
Best wishes. Shaun the Villa fan in Bham

Lambert180

Well it's hard to give input from just a graph. But to be fair, it's a very small sample size, and you're still in a fair amount of profit.

What size buy-ins are you most commonly playing? MTTs can be a beast with variance, your graph has taken a dip over the last like 100 games, but look at the peak over the first 100 (and the dip is alot less than the peak). MTT graphs will look very up and down when it's over such a small sample size but it's up long term and that's what matters.

If you're playing the same tournies and still playing your same game in the 2nd 100 games as you were in the first 100, then don't worry about it, just keep pluggin away.

shaun84

In Response to Re: Any observations on my Sharkscope Graphs?:

Well it's hard to give input from just a graph. But to be fair, it's a very small sample size, and you're still in a fair amount of profit. What size buy-ins are you most commonly playing? MTTs can be a beast with variance, your graph has taken a dip over the last like 100 games, but look at the peak over the first 100 (and the dip is alot less than the peak). MTT graphs will look very up and down when it's over such a small sample size but it's up long term and that's what matters. If you're playing the same tournies and still playing your same game in the 2nd 100 games as you were in the first 100, then don't worry about it, just keep pluggin away.
Posted by Lambert180

Kind words Lambert180. I am still playing my game (I think). I am still well in profit on the other site and marginally in profit on Sky so I am not complaining just wanted to see if people thought I had gone on a heater for the first part to get a spike in my Graph and then reverted to my usual Donk self for the second half.lol.
Best wishes and thanks for replying. Shaun the Villa fan in Bham