maybe when your down to your final 6 it jumps into a full 6 man table, cus i could imagine, player 1 v player 2 = player 1 wins, now has all of player 2s chips, and player 3 comes with a huge disadvantage. If you put the final 6 into a full table, then the game would have an even greater aspect to it, in my oppinion Posted by sillymunch
If you do that, firstly it wouldn't be a HU tourney, and secondly... player 1 can take all of player 2s chips, but likewise player 3 can take all of player 4s chips. There's 3 games going on when it's down to 6. It only becomes strange when it's down 3 players, and it really is swings and roundabouts.
Somtimes playing 3 will have 100k and player 1 and 2 will have 40k each so no matter who wins, it still won't be a big chip lead. Also, even if they do have a chip disadvantage on the FT, being the 3rd person means you automatically ladder to 2nd place cos you can't be knocked out. It'll all even out when you play enough as with everything
Comments
Somtimes playing 3 will have 100k and player 1 and 2 will have 40k each so no matter who wins, it still won't be a big chip lead. Also, even if they do have a chip disadvantage on the FT, being the 3rd person means you automatically ladder to 2nd place cos you can't be knocked out. It'll all even out when you play enough as with everything