All Categories› Poker Chat

You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

What would you do(hypothetically)

stokefcstokefc Member Posts: 7,908
edited May 2012 in Poker Chat

This wouldn,t happen well not in my eyes anyway i think its unethical but say you were HU in one of the ME/mini  the person who you were with had already won the other then they offered you lets say 2k so to let them win both for the jackpot,would you?

· Share on Twitter

Comments

  • scotty77scotty77 Member Posts: 4,970
    edited May 2012
    No because if you look in the TandCs any jackpot winner will have their hands checked and verified for any possible collusion....any wrong doing will mean that the jackpot isn't paid out
    · Share on Twitter
  • stokefcstokefc Member Posts: 7,908
    edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: What would you do(hypoyheticly):
    No because if you look in the TandCs any jackpot winner will have their hands checked and verified for any possible collusion....any wrong doing will mean that the jackpot isn't paid out
    Posted by scotty77
    thread closed :)
    · Share on Twitter
  • pod1pod1 Member Posts: 4,377
    edited May 2012
    i reckon i could make it look good,i play enough random hands badly any hows. :-)
    · Share on Twitter
  • FlyingDaggFlyingDagg Member Posts: 4,146
    edited May 2012
    In Response to What would you do(hypothetically):
    This wouldn,t happen well not in my eyes anyway i think its unethical but say you were HU in one of the ME/mini  the person who you were with had already won the other then they offered you lets say 2k so to let them win both for the jackpot,would you?
    Posted by stokefc
    And you reckon they would honour it?
    · Share on Twitter
  • stokefcstokefc Member Posts: 7,908
    edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: What would you do(hypothetically):
    In Response to What would you do(hypothetically) : And you reckon they would honour it?
    Posted by FlyingDagg
    of cause i do, i believe anything anybody tells me, dont you :)
    · Share on Twitter
  • The_Don90The_Don90 Member Posts: 9,818
    edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: What would you do(hypothetically):
    In Response to Re: What would you do(hypothetically) : of cause i do, i believe anything anybody tells me, dont you :)
    Posted by stokefc
    bluffing stokefc prepared ;)
    · Share on Twitter
  • POKERTREVPOKERTREV Member Posts: 9,607
    edited May 2012
    The variation of hands that you would or could shove/play with "Heads Up" is massive.

    Its not all about your holding cards when you are playing HU, its about aggresion. sometimes we have to put the pressure on and make the steal with "Air", So its very unlikely that you would NOT be paid out based on the hand history itself.

    You would deffinately NOT get paid the jackpot, if you had discussed it in the chatbox.

    In my own mind, I would be aware of what was on offer to the winner, but its almost impossible to come to a PAID agreement with the potential jackpot winner unless you knew him and were able to contact him personally.
    · Share on Twitter
  • martin111martin111 Member Posts: 274
    edited May 2012

    and if u sit out or disconnected?

    · Share on Twitter
  • FlyingDaggFlyingDagg Member Posts: 4,146
    edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: What would you do(hypothetically):
    The variation of hands that you would or could shove/play with "Heads Up" is massive. Its not all about your holding cards when you are playing HU, its about aggresion. sometimes we have to put the pressure on and make the steal with "Air", So its very unlikely that you would NOT be paid out based on the hand history itself. You would deffinately  NOT get paid the jackpot, if you had discussed it in the chatbox. In my own mind, I would be aware of what was on offer to the winner, but its almost impossible to come to a PAID agreement with the potential jackpot winner unless you knew him and were able to contact him personally.
    Posted by POKERTREV
    Trevor being slightly pedantic to a silly question in the first place (apolgies Stoke no offence meant)
    · Share on Twitter
  • FlyingDaggFlyingDagg Member Posts: 4,146
    edited May 2012
    Full T*** did utilise a DEAL button when you got heads up in a tourney
    · Share on Twitter
  • stokefcstokefc Member Posts: 7,908
    edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: What would you do(hypothetically):
    In Response to Re: What would you do(hypothetically) : Trevor being slightly pedantic to a silly question in the first place (apolgies Stoke no offence meant)
    Posted by FlyingDagg
    i know fd,i was just being abit mischievous with the question,i hope nobody takes it as a serious question
    chop ftw ;)
    · Share on Twitter
  • POKERTREVPOKERTREV Member Posts: 9,607
    edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: What would you do(hypothetically):
    In Response to Re: What would you do(hypothetically) : Trevor being slightly pedantic to a silly question in the first place (apolgies Stoke no offence meant)
    Posted by FlyingDagg
    Sorry VC Dagg, I was suffering the effects of alcohol :) I really should go straight to bed when I get home lol. 
    · Share on Twitter
  • FlyingDaggFlyingDagg Member Posts: 4,146
    edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: What would you do(hypothetically):
    In Response to Re: What would you do(hypothetically) : Sorry VC Dagg, I was suffering the effects of alcohol :) I really should go straight to bed when I get home lol. 
    Posted by POKERTREV
    Ah darts night is back then? that explains it.
    · Share on Twitter
  • POKERTREVPOKERTREV Member Posts: 9,607
    edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: What would you do(hypothetically):
    In Response to Re: What would you do(hypothetically) : Ah darts night is back then? that explains it.
    Posted by FlyingDagg
    Yes indeed - and in all honesty, I was much better at the drinking than I was at the darts :)
    · Share on Twitter
  • stokefcstokefc Member Posts: 7,908
    edited May 2012
    In Response to Re: What would you do(hypothetically):
    In Response to Re: What would you do(hypothetically) : Yes indeed - and in all honesty, I was much better at the drinking than I was at the darts :)
    Posted by POKERTREV
    your better at drinking than poker too m8
    edit:    ;)    just in case
    · Share on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.