WHAT DO YOU THINK HERE?
He could have had 88, TT, AT and more likely as all four Q's would be out...a rarity. Or am i just grasping at straws? Oh yes, one
important thing that may sway your opiniion was that opponent had called AI preflop with AJs in lev 1 which suggested he was loose and 'adventurous' to me.
PlayerActionCardsAmountPotBalanceBigman571Small blind 50.0050.001345.00profman15Big blind 100.00150.001875.00 Your hole cards8Q@Call100.00250.003910.00scotty368Fold Bigman571Fold profman15Check Flop Q6Q@Check Turn 10@Unmatched bet 1175.004000.002035.00profman15Show8Q@Show10Q River 9@WinFull House, Queens and 10s4000.00 6035.0
Comments
+1 to above. Not anything much i can see to disagree with in that at all.
Some really good points by you all. i must admit that the opponents previously loose all in in level one could see him without a Q. By checking, i was trying to lure him in and when the T brought a bet, i must expect i was thinking he had AT or a pair. Tripped myself up , i guess. Ta for your help...