You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

have to stack off here given previous hand?

jams88jams88 Member Posts: 694
edited July 2012 in The Poker Clinic
1st hand that im getting my read from and his general limp call play
PlayerActionCardsAmountPotBalance
ThexMajor Small blind   £0.10 £0.10 £22.02
Luzhniki Big blind   £0.20 £0.30 £23.38
  Your hole cards
  • Q
  • Q
     
fatman844 Call   £0.20 £0.50 £31.24
jams88 Raise   £0.80 £1.30 £18.90
ThexMajor Fold        
Luzhniki Fold        
fatman844 Call   £0.60 £1.90 £30.64
Flop
   
  • 9
  • 2
  • 3
     
fatman844 Check        
jams88 Bet   £1.20 £3.10 £17.70
fatman844 Raise   £2.40 £5.50 £28.24
jams88 Raise   £6.23 £11.73 £11.47
fatman844 All-in   £28.24 £39.97 £0.00
jams88 All-in   £11.47 £51.44 £0.00
fatman844 Unmatched bet   £11.74 £39.70 £11.74
fatman844 Show
  • Q
  • 9
     
jams88 Show
  • Q
  • Q
     
Turn
   
  • 3
     
River
   
  • 10
     
jams88 Win Two Pairs, Queens and 3s £37.90   £37.90
i think i am ahead of his overall range here often enough to make this right?
PlayerActionCardsAmountPotBalance
mancity11 Small blind   £0.10 £0.10 £13.36
Luzhniki Big blind   £0.20 £0.30 £44.13
  Your hole cards
  • A
  • J
     
fatman844 Call   £0.20 £0.50 £35.55
jams88 Raise   £0.80 £1.30 £42.46
JOE07 Fold        
mancity11 Fold        
Luzhniki Fold        
fatman844 Call   £0.60 £1.90 £34.95
Flop
   
  • J
  • 3
  • 6
     
fatman844 Check        
jams88 Bet   £1.20 £3.10 £41.26
fatman844 Raise   £3.00 £6.10 £31.95
jams88 Raise   £7.40 £13.50 £33.86
fatman844 All-in   £31.95 £45.45 £0.00
jams88 Call   £26.35 £71.80 £7.51
fatman844 Show
  • K
  • K
     
jams88 Show
  • A
  • J
     
Turn
   
  • 5
     
River
   
  • 8
     
fatman844 Win Pair of Kings £70.00   £70.00
bye bye profit + half BI sigh

Comments

  • Lambert180Lambert180 Member Posts: 12,197
    edited July 2012
    Well yeah, obviously the more times you've seen someone do something the better, but you've just seen this guy happily stack off with TP mediocre kicker, then he's played the next hand virtually identical.

    Pain in the **** these sort of people who limp/call Q9o and do exactly the same with KK, but you just gotta do what is right most of the time.
  • BigHawk89BigHawk89 Member Posts: 627
    edited July 2012
    Kind of unlucky but you gotta think is he really going to stack off to the same player with a TPWK like he did in the previous hand??? These donks do learn sometimes lol but once you raise 7.40 and he sticks it in you have to call but i wouldnt be too happy about it.
  • jams88jams88 Member Posts: 694
    edited July 2012
    I should probably clarify its not the exact next hand about 10mins later. I couldnt see what he is doing this with that i am losing to except perhaps a set but is that a weakness in my game?
  • Curt360x27Curt360x27 Member Posts: 490
    edited July 2012
    He's obv bad, so yeah get your chips in and be happy about life with TPTK.
  • Batkin88Batkin88 Member Posts: 1,682
    edited July 2012
    In Response to Re: have to stack off here given previous hand?:
    He's obv bad, so yeah get your chips in and be happy about life with TPTK.
    Posted by Curt360x27
    Why is he obv bad??? There is such thing as a limping game and to be fair to the villain here if he is doing it with every hand in his range it makes him so hard to read! If he is limping all the time and repeating his play with his entire range I would hardly say he is OBV bad. You see players like DEEB, HANSEN and Hellmuth continuosly use this sort of play as it not only tilts players but makes your hands so hard to read.
    Personally I learnt my poker through this site so have always wanted to bring it in with a raise but I don't agree that limping like the above hands makes you a bad player. I f he limps Q9 then opend 3x with KK thats bad but he hasn't.
  • Curt360x27Curt360x27 Member Posts: 490
    edited July 2012
    In Response to Re: have to stack off here given previous hand?:
    In Response to Re: have to stack off here given previous hand? : Why is he obv bad??? There is such thing as a limping game and to be fair to the villain here if he is doing it with every hand in his range it makes him so hard to read! If he is limping all the time and repeating his play with his entire range I would hardly say he is OBV bad. You see players like DEEB, HANSEN and Hellmuth continuosly use this sort of play as it not only tilts players but makes your hands so hard to read. Personally I learnt my poker through this site so have always wanted to bring it in with a raise but I don't agree that limping like the above hands makes you a bad player. I f he limps Q9 then opend 3x with KK thats bad but he hasn't.
    Posted by Batkin88
    Just furthers my point even more!
  • Batkin88Batkin88 Member Posts: 1,682
    edited July 2012
    lol
  • AMYBRAMYBR Member Posts: 3,432
    edited July 2012
    I think we have to lose, but am not sure we have to get it aiof.  I dont really love 3 betting this flop with 1pr hand, flopping being what it is.  I prob flat his c/r this time tbh.

    May be coloured by seeing result thou, not sure.  Generally think would be a better line, but with specific reads may be ok.

    Perhaps next time leave result out.  Ul tho
  • rancidrancid Member Posts: 5,945
    edited July 2012
    some oppo u can stack off like this ahead with one pair - some you can't

    this oppo you can going by reads, but think your reads need to be based on a larger sample size to be relied upon
Sign In or Register to comment.