In Response to Re: 1.5/3: Hero Call? : It's hardly a good thread or a realistic hand considering how stupidly tight he plays, as if he's calling here, let alone the fact calling is so lol moronic it shows he has no grasp of what he's doing. (whole hand is well played imo). Let's go and continue discussing all his previous excellent strat posts. oh wait n/m sure happens. Obviously he's posted so much good content I couldn't see it. Posted by beaneh
I dont know what im doing so posting strat would be counterproductive.
I didnt post the hand looking for an answer. I just thought it might generate discussion.
In Response to Re: 1.5/3: Hero Call? : I dont know what im doing so posting strat would be counterproductive. I didnt post the hand looking for an answer. I just thought it might generate discussion. Posted by offshoot
Yeah theres no way you can justify calling here against a random unkown but it is interesting to hear yours and others thoughts.
In Response to Re: 1.5/3: Hero Call? : So your telling me after all this 9 high wasnt good v a guy whos called us 2 streets. I must got and re-read/watch every holdem post/book/progromme i can find and re-understand poker. I always rhought 9 high was the nuts. Posted by The_Don90
In Response to Re: 1.5/3: Hero Call? : most boring reply ever Posted by bolly580
It was actually an embarrassing read..
If Beaneh wants to create a hostile environment that's up to him.. I don't think it's necessarily a good look for him, but nonetheless he has history with offshoot or whatever and that qualifies him to write whatever he likes. I'm embarrassed for the people like the don and others who corroborate his opinions based purely on the fact they want to join in with Beaneh and be on his 'side'.. massively cringe.
As for the op, if he did infact call then that is just the biggest misinterpretation of what good poker is.
In Response to Re: 1.5/3: Hero Call? : It was actually an embarrassing read.. If Beaneh wants to create a hostile environment that's up to him.. I don't think it's necessarily a good look for him, but nonetheless he has history with offshoot or whatever and that qualifies him to write whatever he likes. I'm embarrassed for the people like the don and others who corroborate his opinions based purely on the fact they want to join in with Beaneh and be on his 'side'.. massively cringe. As for the op, if he did infact call then that is just the biggest misinterpretation of what good poker is. Posted by pr1nnyraid
I mean im only gonna defend my play so much but this is just hyperbole. Its obviously a lot closer than you think.
Even though shoving is probably the better option calling is fine.
In Response to Re: 1.5/3: Hero Call? : I mean im only gonna defend my play so much but this is just hyperbole. Its obviously a lot closer than you think. Posted by offshoot
I wasn't getting on your case.. but If you want to be so literal about my wording then yes that would be hyperbole. I just feel like your calling to feed an ego, give me 1 solid reason you just called and didnt raise? what did they even have btw
In Response to Re: 1.5/3: Hero Call? : I wasn't getting on your case.. but If you want to be so literal about my wording then yes that would be hyperbole. I just feel like your calling to feed an ego, give me 1 solid reason you just called and didnt raise? what did they even have btw Posted by pr1nnyraid
Im calling to win money, no other reason. I dont know why i didnt shove. It was obviously a mistake. Calling is definitely not bad though even though it was wrong this time.
In Response to Re: 1.5/3: Hero Call? : Im calling to win money, no other reason. I dont know why i didnt shove. It was obviously a mistake. Calling is definitely not bad though even though it was wrong this time. he had T9. Posted by offshoot
was it 109ss at least UL nearly won the hero t-shirt
FTW I don't think it's that bad a call but really with A/K high - shove is so superman FTW
In Response to Re: 1.5/3: Hero Call? : Im calling to win money, no other reason. I dont know why i didnt shove. It was obviously a mistake. Calling is definitely not bad though even though it was wrong this time. he had T9. Posted by offshoot
Calling is definitively bad imo, assuming he is bluffing. The only time you could just c/c is if you were both 300bb's deep and you didn't want to risk him rebluffing the river or hero calling Ahi as your line wouldnt make sense either. As it happens you had a limited risk shoving for an extra ~40bb's so no reason not to if he is bluffing.
Bluffs you beat- 22-55. 6,2/6,3/6,4/6,5/5,4/6,8/5,8 Bluffs you don't beat- 10,6/Q,6/K,6/A,6/10,9/A,K/A,Q/A,10- ALL FD's 10hi or more Bluffs that fold to a shove- ALL OF THE ABOVE
In Response to Re: 1.5/3: Hero Call? : It was actually an embarrassing read.. If Beaneh wants to create a hostile environment that's up to him.. I don't think it's necessarily a good look for him, but nonetheless he has history with offshoot or whatever and that qualifies him to write whatever he likes. I'm embarrassed for the people like the don and others who corroborate his opinions based purely on the fact they want to join in with Beaneh and be on his 'side'.. massively cringe. As for the op, if he did infact call then that is just the biggest misinterpretation of what good poker is. Posted by pr1nnyraid
My post was meant in good humour and tried to put humout on the thread rather than an arguement clearly its not been taken like that. Sigh mods may delete it.
Can i also state i didnt intend to take sides, ive actually got a great deal of respect for both players.
Comments
I didnt post the hand looking for an answer. I just thought it might generate discussion.
I must got and re-read/watch every holdem post/book/progromme i can find and re-understand poker. I always rhought 9 high was the nuts.
If Beaneh wants to create a hostile environment that's up to him.. I don't think it's necessarily a good look for him, but nonetheless he has history with offshoot or whatever and that qualifies him to write whatever he likes.
I'm embarrassed for the people like the don and others who corroborate his opinions based purely on the fact they want to join in with Beaneh and be on his 'side'.. massively cringe.
As for the op, if he did infact call then that is just the biggest misinterpretation of what good poker is.
(agree w Splashy)
Even though shoving is probably the better option calling is fine.
If you want to be so literal about my wording then yes that would be hyperbole. I just feel like your calling to feed an ego, give me 1 solid reason you just called and didnt raise? what did they even have btw
he had T9.
UL nearly won the hero t-shirt
FTW I don't think it's that bad a call but really with A/K high - shove is so superman FTW
Bluffs you beat- 22-55. 6,2/6,3/6,4/6,5/5,4/6,8/5,8
Bluffs you don't beat- 10,6/Q,6/K,6/A,6/10,9/A,K/A,Q/A,10- ALL FD's 10hi or more
Bluffs that fold to a shove- ALL OF THE ABOVE
Can i also state i didnt intend to take sides, ive actually got a great deal of respect for both players.