You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
Annoying short stacks!!!
kidwiz10
Member Posts: 569
Okai this is a bit of a rant so be nice on the replies!
Sky you need to introduce tables where the game is NL50 make the max buy in equal to the minumum buy in.
Nothing worse than having 4 players sat with £10 each it ruins the whole structure of the the game big time
Plus the worse part that keeps happening on my tables is when they triple up they leave straight away!!! its extremely annoying so yea sky this be big help doin this
Rant over thankyou:)
Sky you need to introduce tables where the game is NL50 make the max buy in equal to the minumum buy in.
Nothing worse than having 4 players sat with £10 each it ruins the whole structure of the the game big time
Plus the worse part that keeps happening on my tables is when they triple up they leave straight away!!! its extremely annoying so yea sky this be big help doin this
Rant over thankyou:)
Comments
It's their money, if they want to play with short stacks, that's their prerogative.
I actualy understand your reasons completely and maybe Sky should introduce some table like this for you and like-minded individuals. It does alter the dynamic of the cas game, i suspect. However £10 players are playing within the rules and are entitled to use any strategy they wish as well. It may suit them.
So Sky , variety IS the spice of life...try it and see how it goes.
Mind, i don't play cah so you won't be seeing me fella.
I'm not sure it would be right to change the rules of poker, which have existed forever, or almost, because something annoys a player.
I do get the OP's point, of course, but it's get-round-able with a little thought.
The Site has to try & cater for every taste & bankroll, (good luck with that!) it cannot simply accede to a complaint on the basis that something annoys someone.
Position, stack size, table dynamic, good & bad players, so many variables to contend with, & they are all part of a giant puzzle. The players who recognize this, & give thought to it, will more likely succeed. Or lose less.
The path to success is rarely straight, or flat. We just have to find a way to navigate the twists & turns better than the others.
Tonight, instead, I have to handle the periodically pedantic Mr J Hartigan.
Frying pan & fire spring to mind.
Yea they can be easier when they got short stacks , but my point is you have tables where there is 4 players all sat with the minimim ie £10 , and then you have a waiting list as long as my arm with players ino will buy in for full.
And before anyone sais id rather play a good player sat with money worth winning rather than sumone whos gunna keep buying in for the minimum
Yea there are players who use short stacking as a strategy i understand this i wasnt trying to mean no offence all i was stating was that it would be good if there was tables where you were all sat with the same amount eg
Gotcha kidwiz.
It is a great thing to debate, the crux of it is that we all see things differently, & glory be for that.
Ultimately, though, we all face the same challenges. The winner is the one who works the answer out first. If he gets it right.....
We do have some Cash Tables with varying "sit-downs" already I believe.
https://www.skypoker.com/secure/poker/sky_lobby/poker-promotions/early-bird
And there we have it. A problem arises, and players find a way round it, somehow, somewhere, & in this case, earn extra C4P as a Bonus, MBN.
as has been said it's quite easy to be pretty much unexploitable against them, and it's pretty rare to find a shortstacker on sky that is playing optimally.