You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

POKER CLINIC THURSDAY 22ND NOVEMBER 2012!!!

SkyPokerTVSkyPokerTV Member Posts: 185
edited November 2012 in The Poker Clinic
Hi All,

Please post your hands to be analysed on this thread if you would like us to view them on  the Poker Clinic at 8pm on Thursday 22nd November. All comments/feedback are welcome on all the hands that are posted.


VERY IMPORTANT!
We can only show hands from tables or tournaments with a TV icon next to them.
We also need you to tell us straight off which tournament or table the hand is from, as the hand i.d. on its own takes too long for our team to find.
You can post your hands (and not just your hand IDs in here) so that other community members can comment on the hands too.
We welcome comments on the hands from the Poker Community.


All the best

Luisa

TV TEAM

Comments

  • profman15profman15 Member Posts: 1,808
    edited November 2012
    Hi guys

    This hand no 587304239 came frm the mini open.
    By this stage Ax have more importance and i was a non-believer that my opponent had a flush when flop came.. After all the probability of having suited cards and flop giving you the flush is less than one percent. Without the bet i'd have bet out as had outs and could make semi-bluff. When he donk betted i considered he may hav broadway cards and was probably ahead but i felt that the price was right and by calling then i may get a free card on river as he may be scared of my call. When the str8 came...i felt that i was ahead most probably. Consequently i ai'd to make him pay for flush card or he may call w' 2 pr. Is this play flawed. Would my ss initially have suggested going all-in pre using Nashes equilibrium solutions for sb v bb?
Sign In or Register to comment.