two accounts with the same person

craigcu12

trapping ??? slow playing ??? These hands arent evidence. Show me one where one guy had nothing and called it off.

Lambert180

To be fair, this is just evidence of a bad player, not necessarily collusion.

percival09

lol at this thread. so much

benc

lol what is he gaining from playing pots against himself in this way if so craig?

cenachav

If I were you I would change the title of this thread, could be taken as libel

Lambert180

He's given him like 30 chips tho lol, if he's chip dumping, he's doing it pretty badly. If he wanted to chip dump why wouldnt he raise to 500 then fold to a jam, rather than giving him 30 chips that makes practically zero difference lol

aussie09

craig... i'm at the bar.. what's yours again, special brew with a whisky?



 

cenachav

Buckfast with meth s top.  The purple meth s not the clear stuff.  That would just be wrong

aussie09

... and twiglets or nuts?

cenachav

pork scratchings please, and don't call me nuts

SJspanky1

I do love a good conspiracy theory......

Unfortunately this doesn't even begin to resemble one...

aussie09

In Response to Re: two accounts with the same person:

well you can make stupid comments if you like but you basically just giving advice actually on how to avoid being caught out but being able to use more than one account for sit and go as now more people will know that aslong as they don't go consistantly onto the same SnG tables all they will need to do to avoid being caught is try building a stack with one of their two accounts while the other fold most his hand unless he has a strong one in which case the other guy folds then once it gets near the bubble spread thier chip out again by constantly making small bets when they on the blinds rather than using the ovious way of a big bet followed by a shove off  the other guy  as that is too ovious
Posted by craigcu12

that's the longest sentence ever.

GREGHOGG

If you genuinely suspect collusion/multi accounting, report it to customer care who will look into it

You are wasting your time posting hand histories here which prove nothing, although I understand why you have done it.

GREGHOGG

In Response to Re: two accounts with the same person:

In Response to Re: two accounts with the same person : that's the longest sentence ever.
Posted by aussie09

"well you can make stupid comments if you want... "

you don't need an invitation eh Rob

TPTP123

what if you've searched for a reg and youve seen there name appear more then once but with a diff number on there... would you guys reeport that as well? 

Obv multiaccounting in some cases imo where the username is soo precise its never going to be 2 diff ppl

EditL also i blieve if you do too many searchs than it blocks you from using the function.... i dont know if thats deliberate or a bug 

aussie09

yes, greg.  i think that i should be credited with so many more stupid comments before that particular one.  stupidity is something to be worked at.  stupidity is not just for christmas....




 

BorinLoner

Are the Mods all sleeping or something? How is this thread still going?

Craig, if the two players involved were colluding with each other they would be trying to keep their stacks at a similar level to one another, not giving one a huge stack as happens in many of your hands. Some of the play may be ridiculous but there is no evidence of collusion here. If these two are working together, they're doing it in a pretty stupid way.

The forum is not the place for this sort of thing. The players involved deserve to not have their good names (if not their good skill) dirtied by people posting threads like this. When one of the mods eventually wakes up, they will certainly delete this thread. DO NOT post another like it or they'll end up giving you a forum ban.

If you suspect collusion, you need to report it to customer care. They will deal with it. I wouldn't expect any action to be taken against these two players, though. 

cenachav

In Response to Re: two accounts with the same person:

In Response to Re: two accounts with the same person : that's the longest sentence ever.
Posted by aussie09

No.  That is I do

ckd

 there is no cheating mate 

 the smaller of stack of the 2 lost pots in the hand you shown while the other had a bigger stack 

 if it was cheating it is more than likely the bigger stack would of dumped chips to the lower than winning hands and taking the smaller stacks chips

think you have read a bit to much into it but still if you feel there is something going on report it to cc and they will look into it 

i would remove the players names though as its not allowed and the whole post will be removed and you might get a ban 

gl at the tables mate 

GREGHOGG

In Response to Re: two accounts with the same person:

Are the Mods all sleeping or something? How is this thread still going? Craig, if the two players involved were colluding with each other they would be trying to keep their stacks at a similar level to one another, not giving one a huge stack as happens in many of your hands. Some of the play may be ridiculous but there is no evidence of collusion here. If these two are working together, they're doing it in a pretty stupid way. The forum is not the place for this sort of thing. The players involved deserve to not have their good names (if not their good skill) dirtied by people posting threads like this. When one of the mods eventually wakes up, they will certainly delete this thread. DO NOT post another like it or they'll end up giving you a forum ban. If you suspect collusion, you need to report it to customer care. They will deal with it. I wouldn't expect any action to be taken against these two players, though. 
Posted by BorinLoner

Someone make Borinloner a mod, he can do the "graveyard" shift imo

MP33

In Response to Re: two accounts with the same person:

If you genuinely suspect collusion/multi accounting, report it to customer care who will look into it You are wasting your time posting hand histories here which prove nothing, although I understand why you have done it.
Posted by GREGHOGG

+1 . They will look into any suspicions as they did for me and can also see if the suspects are playing togethor on a regular basis , which we cant find out w/o using up searches on SS