What you think of the hand at 02.47 in not sure i like the idea of 4 bet folding aq if were not willing to get it in then surely we should be calling the 3bet imo as we turn aq into a bluff.
Ive watched all of his videos tho there good to watch.
What you think of the hand at 02.47 in not sure i like the idea of 4 bet folding aq if were not willing to get it in then surely we should be calling the 3bet imo as we turn aq into a bluff. Ive watched all of his videos tho there good to watch. Posted by bearlyther
say that when you are playing wayy over your roll and playing 200bigs lol, i think it is a correct fold its early in the session and they are too deep imo to get AQ in at this stage with no dynamics, so with that in mind calling the 3 bet may be better and playing a bit of post flop poker.
Im looking to upload 2 or 3 videos of me 8 tabling tournaments in the near future and putting it up on youtube. Watch out for it then you can all berate my play!
well...somone takes a shot on sky and everyone ridicules him and his play?
O sorry, to be honest id much rather read about this than somone with a BR of £200 saying i think ive beat NL4 now you think i should take a shot at Nl10?
Cudos on smitalos, and btw anyway see the 2nd vid where he ships K high for stacks on river?
taking a shot and not being scared to pull trigger.
well...somone takes a shot on sky and everyone ridicules him and his play? O sorry, to be honest id much rather read about this than somone with a BR of £200 saying i think ive beat NL4 now you think i should take a shot at Nl10? Cudos on smitalos, and btw anyway see the 2nd vid where he ships K high for stacks on river? taking a shot and not being scared to pull trigger. +1 Posted by bolly580
Vids r quality, great move wasn't it considering - what can style cal with, just nuts init Do you think Smit read it for none nut hands, would have been horrible for Style to snap.
In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think..... : Vids r quality, great move wasn't it considering - what can style cal with, just nuts init Do you think Smit read it for none nut hands, would have been horrible for Style to snap. Posted by rancid
haha style snaps its ...O..Odear haha. in all fairness K high was props best hand, shipping river just looked so boss.
well...somone takes a shot on sky and everyone ridicules him and his play? O sorry, to be honest id much rather read about this than somone with a BR of £200 saying i think ive beat NL4 now you think i should take a shot at Nl10? Cudos on smitalos, and btw anyway see the 2nd vid where he ships K high for stacks on river? taking a shot and not being scared to pull trigger. +1 Posted by bolly580
lol this is me
but very interesting heads up play, he must have been sweating so much when he shoved with K high haha
In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think..... : lol this is me but very interesting heads up play, he must have been sweating so much when he shoved with K high haha Posted by sighcall
nothing againt no one imparticular but it seems everyone frowns upon high stakes action on here..
William Reynolds (high stakes pro) recent tweet..online MSNL used to consist of regs spewings buy-ins/shot taking/heads up battles.. now its a buncha nit boxes nit boxing 365 days a year
In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think..... : nothing againt no one imparticular but it seems everyone frowns upon high stakes action on here.. William Reynolds (high stakes pro) recent tweet.. online MSNL used to consist of regs spewings buy-ins/shot taking/heads up battles.. now its a buncha nit boxes nit boxing 365 days a year exactly right Posted by bolly580
yeh im gutted there isnt any higher stakes diarys on here.
As for that quote its possibly true but at the end of the day its their money and if being a nit is most profiitable then thats what they will do, and i dont blame them for that
In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think..... : yeh im gutted there isnt any higher stakes diarys on here. As for that quote its possibly true but at the end of the day its their money and if being a nit is most profiitable then thats what they will do, and i dont blame them for that Posted by sighcall
basically all nits would of wona ton and all now there all gutted everyone's wised up.
IMO people are too stingy with there BR though, especially low stakes...people playing nl 4/8 will find the same crazy donators at 10/20nl if they look hard enough.
The more action we get on the site the better, but that doesn't mean we can't comment on the play. There are some spots where I'd have been more aggro but obv it's easier to say when I play lower stakes so 1) can afford to be more aggro cos I can afford to lose BIs 2) my opponents aren't some of the best players on the site.
I wasn't trying to have a go btw. The more action we get on the site the better, but that doesn't mean we can't comment on the play. There are some spots where I'd have been more aggro but obv it's easier to say when I play lower stakes so 1) can afford to be more aggro cos I can afford to lose BIs 2) my opponents aren't some of the best players on the site. Pretty ballsy thing to do from Smit Posted by Lambert180
judging from his vlogs his BR shot up recently, been smashing it.
Really refreshing to see high stakes player keep a upto date vlog. Dont think he ever played in a casino I play 1/2 at G in sheff (that's where he from) like every other night. Nice to stack him they say PEAAAAAAAAAAAAACE
think Smit said he was laying down too much of a wide range pre, but he said he is not HU player I think he done ok, even though it's a very small amount of hands
In Response to Re: NL1000 session, what do you think..... : Vids r quality, great move wasn't it considering - what can style cal with, just nuts init Do you think Smit read it for none nut hands, would have been horrible for Style to snap. Posted by rancid
+1 ^^^^
trying to get 1 up everyday is almost impossible though, dnt need to do that Smit if you're reading!
1 a week that isn't delayed is the way forward imo, then extra ones if you have something u wanna vlog about!
loved the "25 new ones will be up on Sunday" comment. Never short of ambition
Bolly i sat at a 15.25 table with you the other day (higher than i normally play) and you instantly asked me why i would play you and said that as i'm a regular husng player surely i should look in the lobby and avoid names that i recognize or wudn't have an edge against basically hunt around for soft spots. So who is the real bolly some baller who takes shots? or some bunhunting nit who moans when a player who plays hu often sits at the same table. Anyway thats the first time i have seen a sweat session of a skypoker player and i enjoyed it, but if people post videos then obviously they expect comments on there play regardless of what stakes.
Comments
Vids r quality, great move wasn't it considering - what can style cal with, just nuts init
Do you think Smit read it for none nut hands, would have been horrible for Style to snap.
The more action we get on the site the better, but that doesn't mean we can't comment on the play. There are some spots where I'd have been more aggro but obv it's easier to say when I play lower stakes so 1) can afford to be more aggro cos I can afford to lose BIs 2) my opponents aren't some of the best players on the site.
Pretty ballsy thing to do from Smit
think Smit said he was laying down too much of a wide range pre, but he said he is not HU player
I think he done ok, even though it's a very small amount of hands
His thought process was deffo intresting
Gd video.