You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Standard?

2»

Comments

  • beanehbeaneh Member Posts: 4,079
    edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: Standard?:
    In Response to Re: Standard? : Yeh but this is why Gliterbabe cant progress from 50nl ?? Doesnt try to improve?? Settled it??
    Posted by RyanC7

    they still haven't realised that nor do they have a competitive bone in their body

    as ajs so well highlights, they just sit waiting for free money and the concept of this being an actual strategy game is lost on them.


    delusional really is the word.
  • reelerreeler Member Posts: 422
    edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: Standard?:
    In Response to Re: Standard? : If you want to earn money in life you got to find people who are spending money. If you are a teacher, plasterer, poker player or bin man. eg when a teacher looks for a job he will bum hunt a school thats offering to spend money on teachers not one that want the teachers to work for free. If 6 equally skilled pros are playing each other on a table they all lose cos of rake and cant feed their families. Majority of pros on here look for people who are spending money. Ones who are most concerned at this are all the ones sat hu. I would do it but cant be bothered waiting. A low % of regs think they are superstars outhinking other pros. But they are seriously dillusional. They are not superstars thats proven by the fact they play 100nl on Sky poker lol. Back to my original point, whatever you do in life in you want to earn money at whatever proffesion you choose to take up. You have to find people/organisations who are spending money.
    Posted by ajs4385
    If 6 equally skilled pros are playing each other on a table they all lose cos of rake and cant feed their families.
    why would u  have the dinner money on the table lol
    only kiddin know what ya mean
  • chegs107chegs107 Member Posts: 4
    edited February 2013
    In Response to Re: Standard?:
    For me the biggest mistake you have made in this pot is pre! OOP vs a 4x and a call you need to make it more like £32! If not your just going to be called in both spots often and put into tough decisions down the streets! Ideally you want to get it HU vs the unknown or 5bet shove vs Launder as your 3Bet could be perceived as a squeeze and plays decent vs Launders 4bet range in this spot! As played, think you have to shove turn as he does show up with small Pps/straight draw/ Lower FD and fold a % of the time and when he calls with a hand like he has you still have decent equity to bink
    Posted by UEA_pro
    The above makes a lot of sense. This is the most logical analysis of the hand that I've read. Not bad for a first post on the forum, must be pretty happy with that?!
    To answer a question from the OP - Yes, I do think the jam on the turn turns your hand face up. I don't imagine you will be mixing your value hands into that betting line, especially when you are taking a shot?
    I couldn't agree more with UEA_pro's pre-flop analysis, and I've made the same mistake in a few hands. Given the way it was played though, I like your flop play. I like betting between 70-85 on the turn and calling off if he jams. I think this increases his fold equity a lot, which is obv preferable.
    Thoughts on this?
  • thejudge10thejudge10 Member Posts: 465
    edited February 2013



      wow teeton mill won me  a stack of cash. sure he won the hennessey good racehorse
Sign In or Register to comment.