SHOULD A RULE BE BROUGHT IN TO STOP ARCHIVE POST DIGGING? READ EXAMPLE POST BELOW B4 VOTING!

Comments

• Options

  MereNovice Member Posts: 4,364

  February 2010 edited February 2010

  One of the strengths of any forum is an archive of informative, insightful and amusing threads.
  Just because the odd idiot tries to stir up trouble by resurrecting unfortunate ones shouldn't be allowed to impact on the access to other valuable threads.
  

  0 · Share on Twitter
• Options

  NoseyBonk Member Posts: 6,171

  February 2010 edited February 2010

  On any forum you're going to be able to revive threads that have long been 'dead', it's just the way it has to be. As for 'is it right to go digging for posts' then it depends. What are the motives? I know what you're referring to and in that case I think the motive is clear - to cause trouble - however it won't work because us reglee-ers know better. 

  0 · Share on Twitter
• Options

  Seagull158 Member Posts: 1,100

  February 2010 edited February 2010

  Rover. Better tp ust let it go. We all know why it was done but the guy that did it didn't know the history of all the posts that followed. Not an excuse for him but just a fact. Don't give them the oxygen of publicity and don't rise to the bait.

  0 · Share on Twitter
• Options

  cottlad Member Posts: 439

  February 2010 edited February 2010

  I'd rather read those posts than umpteen pointless poll threads

  0 · Share on Twitter
• Options

  Mr_Miyagi Member Posts: 2,031

  February 2010 edited February 2010

  I think more posts should be dug up!
  
  

  0 · Share on Twitter
• Options

  _Woof_ Member Posts: 21

  February 2010 edited February 2010

  In Response to Re: SHOULD A RULE BE BROUGHT IN TO STOP ARCHIVE POST DIGGING? READ EXAMPLE POST BELOW B4 VOTING!:

  I think more posts should be dug up!
  Posted by Mr_Miyagi

  But then all the fences would fall down ........... what a silly idea.
  

  0 · Share on Twitter
• Options

  MAXALLY Member Posts: 17,532

  February 2010 edited February 2010

  In Response to Re: SHOULD A RULE BE BROUGHT IN TO STOP ARCHIVE POST DIGGING? READ EXAMPLE POST BELOW B4 VOTING!:

  I think more posts should be dug up!
  Posted by Mr_Miyagi

  Are you working for Diggerman?

  0 · Share on Twitter
• Options

  Mr_Miyagi Member Posts: 2,031

  February 2010 edited February 2010

  In Response to Re: SHOULD A RULE BE BROUGHT IN TO STOP ARCHIVE POST DIGGING? READ EXAMPLE POST BELOW B4 VOTING!:

  In Response to Re: SHOULD A RULE BE BROUGHT IN TO STOP ARCHIVE POST DIGGING? READ EXAMPLE POST BELOW B4 VOTING! : But then all the fences would fall down ........... what a silly idea.
  Posted by _Woof_

  Fences do nothing except keep people apart. Maybe if there was no fences we would all get along and Dohhh would not hate James Hartigan!

  0 · Share on Twitter
• Options

  loonytoons Member Posts: 4,270

  February 2010 edited February 2010

  But after fences are gone we can build bridges??

  0 · Share on Twitter
• Options

  Mr_Miyagi Member Posts: 2,031

  February 2010 edited February 2010

  for sure!

  0 · Share on Twitter
• Options

  emilyegg Member Posts: 3,408

  February 2010 edited February 2010

  Whatever Happens, if it is right or wrong, nasty or nice, rude or funny, disrespectful or decent, destructive or constructive.....
  
  WE ARE ALL IN THE SAME COMMUNITY...AND A FANTASTIC ONE AT THAT.
  
  PLEASE, think about this before we are all Censored, Barred or Scoffed at.
  
  I believe we are privileged to post on here. Its the BEST.

  0 · Share on Twitter
• Options

  emilyegg Member Posts: 3,408

  February 2010 edited February 2010

  And if anyone starts on ME, Then kidpoker is coming back.....
  
  
  
  
  The Prosecution calls Mr Vinny Gambini........

  0 · Share on Twitter
• Options

  penguin7 Member Posts: 1,094

  February 2010 edited February 2010

  In Response to Re: SHOULD A RULE BE BROUGHT IN TO STOP ARCHIVE POST DIGGING? READ EXAMPLE POST BELOW B4 VOTING!:

  But after fences are gone we can build bridges??
  Posted by loonytoons

  What happens if you burn your bridges ?

  0 · Share on Twitter
• Options

  Macacan Member Posts: 129

  February 2010 edited February 2010

  In Response to SHOULD A RULE BE BROUGHT IN TO STOP ARCHIVE POST DIGGING? READ EXAMPLE POST BELOW B4 VOTING!:

   IS IT RIGHT TO GO DIGGING FOR PAST POSTS ON POSTERS, WHEN THE GUY/GAL HAS ALREADY SAID SOZ HE/SHE WAS WRONG . SHOULD SKYRICH DELETE THESE POSTS , SHOULD IT BE KNOCKED IN THE HEAD NOW B4 IT GETS OUT OF CONTROL . DISCUSS BUT DONT TURN IN TO A SLANGING MATCH  PRETTY PLZZZZZZZZ !
  Posted by IRISHROVER

  I like the thought, i dont think such a rule could be monitored properly, unless every post was is put out of reach. Reading through last nights and this mornings threads, its  ashame the way they have panned out in to  such a frenzy.
  
  I think the orignal post should be deleted, but at the request of, or by those involed.
  
  Maca

  0 · Share on Twitter