I think people that like to be abused should say so on their avatar, or else make it patently obvious some other way, like greghogg does Posted by oynutter
+1
(I noticed that too, strange very strange, still it's legal I suppose).
In Response to Re: Table chat bans,... : very fair comment. Ive never had any hassles. Nor did i actually care about the chatbox while i was watching the table - in all honesty i dont care - to some people they do. I only brought it up because i thought its what you where referring to in page 1. Anyways - yes rules should apply to all. Posted by The_Don90
Ditto ,m8, But to step out of my tongue in cheek mode for a bit, I do enjoy the banter and ecorporate it into my game. imo the fracas in question was nothing in my book, I have had railers baiting me on many many occasions at high stakes, I have never complained and never would,
I would find it incredable if sky poker banned all railing chat because of one players comments, Its very simple. Ban the offender.
What constitutes an bannable offence? Hurting a players feelings? Saying you think they will lose? Pointing out that they broke the rules?
We all have a good idea of what would be construed as stepping over the line.
I dont think skypoker would selectively ban railchat on high stakes and leave open an unfair advantage for the high stakes players to railchat up an coming players like you and I.
This post was meant to get some clarification on the rules.
I have read the rules, and am non the wiser.
If people don't know exactly what will be tolerated, and what wont, then they are always gonna either take advantage, or end up being stitched up..................depending on the circumstances.
I didn't post here, to get everyone chat banned.
Completely the opposite. If people are aware of exactly what will get them a ban, they can behave, or be banged up accordingly with no excuses.
My personal opinion is that most people who complain are just being childish, and pathetic, as much as/or even more so, than the people they are reporting.
Chat bans should be handed out for people strongly abusing an individual personally, things such as racism....genuine racism tho, not just someone calling me a Yorkie t*at!
It's the old "mountains and molehills" thing - it is what u make of it.
But if the rules are precisely outlined, then nobody can have any complaints when they come a Roy Cropper.
This post was meant to get some clarification on the rules. I have read the rules, and am non the wiser. If people don't know exactly what will be tolerated, and what wont, then they are always gonna either take advantage, or end up being stitched up..................depending on the circumstances. I didn't post here, to get everyone chat banned. Completely the opposite. If people are aware of exactly what will get them a ban, they can behave, or be banged up accordingly with no excuses. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ My personal opinion is that most people who complain are just being childish, and pathetic, as much as/or even more so, than the people they are reporting. Chat bans should be handed out for people strongly abusing an individual personally, things such as racism....genuine racism tho, not just someone calling me a Yorkie t*at! It's the old "mountains and molehills" thing - it is what u make of it. But if the rules are precisely outlined, then nobody can have any complaints when they come a Roy Cropper. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stop acting like a big bunch of fairies (I would have said girls, but I know how touchy Lucy can be sometimes) Posted by DOHHHHHHH
Huh, Im soo offended, my granny was a fairy.
You You bounder
Help modorator, We have a fairy hater in our midst.
I removed it myself mate, it would only cause a spat with the "sky mafia" lol. Though I do believe the smallbankrollers are ignored by the powers that be Posted by steveskin1
Why do you say that, Steve? What evidence do you have?
I1n Response to Re: Table chat bans,... : Why do you say that, Steve? What evidence do you have? Posted by tikay1
No evidence needed, its just a fact. Not just the bankroll thing either, there is lots of favouritism too........Merenovice is an example for a start, but could name a dozen of that ilk.
In Response to Re: Table chat bans,... : Hes consulting his legal team and will provide evidence in a court of law if required. lay advisor NODEAL Posted by NODEAL
their taking it to court
I submit the following hand ids as evidence that sky does not like low stake players
In Response to Re: Table chat bans,... : their taking it to court I submit the following hand ids as evidence that sky does not like low stake players #1111111 #2222222 #30291487 Posted by The_Don90
Comments
In Response to Re: Table chat bans,...:
Ditto ,m8, But to step out of my tongue in cheek mode for a bit, I do enjoy the banter and ecorporate it into my game. imo the fracas in question was nothing in my book, I have had railers baiting me on many many occasions at high stakes, I have never complained and never would,I would find it incredable if sky poker banned all railing chat because of one players comments, Its very simple. Ban the offender.
What constitutes an bannable offence? Hurting a players feelings? Saying you think they will lose? Pointing out that they broke the rules?
We all have a good idea of what would be construed as stepping over the line.
I dont think skypoker would selectively ban railchat on high stakes and leave open an unfair advantage for the high stakes players to railchat up an coming players like you and I.
cheers bud
You You bounder
Help modorator, We have a fairy hater in our midst.
peter
lay advisor
NODEAL
I submit the following hand ids as evidence that sky does not like low stake players
#1111111
#2222222
#30291487
Did they listen when we told them this isn't fair?
although i do agree maybe if you can ignore specific people, i wouldn't but seems to be alot of people on here who are bothered by keyboard warriors