All Categories› Community Suggestions

You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Minimum buy-in

IVISONIVISON Member Posts: 5
edited January 2010 in Community Suggestions
Any chance in the future of Sky increasing the minimum buy in to a table? Say 50xbb?

There's even 1 table at 5/10p level that you can join with 50p!

What does everyone think? Pro or anti smallstack?
· Share on Twitter

Comments

  • webby234webby234 Member Posts: 1,781
    edited December 2009
    some people havent got the 50bb that you say should be required?
    · Share on Twitter
  • IVISONIVISON Member Posts: 5
    edited December 2009

    Maybe they couild drop to a lower table then.

    · Share on Twitter
  • TorryladdTorryladd Member Posts: 503
    edited December 2009
    Seems fine as it is
    · Share on Twitter
  • chelschels Member Posts: 149
    edited December 2009
    i like the way it is, if it aint broke dont fix it
    · Share on Twitter
  • SHANXTASHANXTA Member Posts: 1,507
    edited December 2009
    would be great if sky introduced 'deepstack' cash tables, where min buy in is 100bb's n max is normally 200bb's, alot of other sites have them and they are getting more and more popular with players getting frustrated with people loadin up wiv 10/20 bb's n jus waiting 2 push
    · Share on Twitter
  • diablo_pezdiablo_pez Member Posts: 1,392
    edited December 2009
    In Response to Re: Minimum buy-in:
    would be great if sky introduced 'deepstack' cash tables, where min buy in is 100bb's n max is normally 200bb's, alot of other sites have them and they are getting more and more popular with players getting frustrated with people loadin up wiv 10/20 bb's n jus waiting 2 push
    Posted by SHANXTA
    They had these a few months ago and they were always empty!
    · Share on Twitter
  • chelschels Member Posts: 149
    edited December 2009
    not surprised in the slightest
    · Share on Twitter
  • Hogg321Hogg321 Member Posts: 260
    edited December 2009
    possible at the higher levels but at the lower levels keep it as it is, if someone wants to lose 50p at a 5p/10p, let em :)
    · Share on Twitter
  • codcod Member Posts: 36
    edited December 2009
    In Response to Minimum

    Posted by IVISON

    VERY GOOD POST IVO.SMALLSTACKERS ARE THE VERMIN ON SKY POKER AND ALL OTHER SITES.I MYSELF NEVER PARTICIPATE IN THIS VERMINOUS ACT.IF THEY AINT GOT THEW CASH TO PLAY AT THE BIGGER TABLES KEEP THE H OFF THEM,I HATE THE WAY THEY SIT THERE WAITING FOR A PREMIUM STARTING HAND AND GOING ALLIN,MUCH HATE.I SUPPOSE THE ONLY WAY TO KEEP EVERYONE HAPPY IS TO HAVE EQUAL TABLES OF MIN BUY INS AND TABLES WHERE U GOTTA PUT IN THE MAX,SOLVED.GET ON AND DO IT SKY ,SURELY U GOT THE KNOW HOW.I REALLY HATE SHORTSTACKERS,THEYRE LIKE GYPSYS OR SUMMIT,WELL I AINT BUYING NO MORE PEGS.THE NEXT TIME A HORRIBLE SHORTY SITS ON MY TABLE IM OFF,SO THERE.HOW CAN ANYONE NOT SEE MY POINT,HOW?P.S CAN I HAVE U AS A FRIEND IVO AS I HAVNT ANY UP TO NOW SEPT FARCTATE
    · Share on Twitter
  • codcod Member Posts: 36
    edited December 2009
    In Response to Re: Minimum buy-in:
    Maybe they couild drop to a lower table then.
    Posted by IVISON
    MAYBE DROP OFF A CLIFF EVEN BETTER
    · Share on Twitter
  • codcod Member Posts: 36
    edited December 2009
    In Response to Re: Minimum buy-in:
    i like the way it is, if it aint broke dont fix it
    Posted by chels
    WAT U LIKE ABOUT IT
    · Share on Twitter
  • codcod Member Posts: 36
    edited December 2009
    In Response to Re: Minimum buy-in:
    some people havent got the 50bb that you say should be required?
    Posted by webby234
    THEN LET EM PLAY ON FRRTABLES
    · Share on Twitter
  • codcod Member Posts: 36
    edited December 2009
    In Response to Re: Minimum buy-in:
    i like the way it is, if it aint broke dont fix it
    Posted by chels
    IT IS BROKE DEAR
    · Share on Twitter
  • heapey0015heapey0015 Member Posts: 26
    edited December 2009
    why hide post from ivison
    · Share on Twitter
  • N1CKN1CK Member Posts: 1,453
    edited January 2010
    short stackers are a pain in the xxxx, most sites have 50BB min tables, im not saying all tables should be this way but it would be nice to sit at a table were players who leave arnt replaced by others with like 6 BBs, you know it makes sense!
    · Share on Twitter
  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH Member Posts: 17,929
    edited January 2010

    Im with ya fella just make some tables 50bb min..doesnt have to be all of em. - Even when I moved up once to NL100, someone sat next to me with a tenner!! Cudnt believe it - thats just toooo short!

    DOHH
    · Share on Twitter
  • silentbobsilentbob Member Posts: 2,137
    edited January 2010
    Personally I think we should have a normal & deep stack cash tables.

    Normal tables should be minimum 20BB (maybe 25) & 100 max

    Deep stack should be 75 (maybe 100) min & 250 max.

    I regularly play the 5/10 tables & really don't understand why you would sit down with £20. If I'm gonna sit down with that much then I'll go play 10/20 (which I do on occasions).

    Also, I quite often see people sit down with £1 & constantly shove every hand then promptly leave when they lose. If you want to do that then go play a roulette SnG.
    · Share on Twitter
  • ACESOVER8sACESOVER8s Member Posts: 1,307
    edited January 2010
    Each to their own, if you wanna buy in for 5 bb to clear the last 50p from your account then it doesn't bother me although there is probably no point. I understand Max buy ins to stop people just buying tables but never really understood a min buy in. If you want to sit at a table with 1 bb and lose it the why does the site care? (although i do understand why as players people don't like ultra short stacks)
    · Share on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.