In Response to Re: My worst beat ever I would say! : Your opinion is not wanted after what you said, I honestly cannot believe you are still writing on this thread I will do you a favour as you clearly want the last word and leave the final post to yourself. I would like to confirm however I reported what you said as it was disgusting and vile and I hope one day you realise what a pathetic person you are. Hopefully we will meet one day and we can see if you are as confident in person which I am pretty sure will be the complete opposite as is with most forum trolls. Again I will not reply to your next post not only because it will probably bore me to death but also as you clearly want the last word like the child you have shown yourself as. Enter your reply below (Make it as sarcastic and as funny as possible to smother your own ego as you will likely be the only one reading it) Kalie (Female age 25) xx Posted by Batkin88
"Your opinion is not wanted after what you said, I honestly cannot believe you are still writing on this thread"
You are quite right, I should have been given 30years in Parkhurst for my crimes against humanity.
"I will do you a favour as you clearly want the last word and leave the final post to yourself."
Very kind of you
"I would like to confirm however I reported what you said as it was disgusting and vile"
You go girl
"I hope one day you realise what a pathetic person you are."
A generalisation based on what exactly.
"Hopefully we will meet one day and we can see if you are as confident in person which I am pretty sure will be the complete opposite as is with most forum trolls."
Sorry, your inability to form reasoned debates mean I think you would not stimulate me intellectually, if we meet by accident then so be it.
"Again I will not reply to your next post not only because it will probably bore me to death but also as you clearly want the last word like the child you have shown yourself as."
Blimey, I would hate to have dared say something intentionally offensive, I presume you would had have me deported by now.
"Enter your reply below (Make it as sarcastic and as funny as possible to smother your own ego as you will likely be the only one reading"
Challenge accepted
"Kalie (Female age 25) xx"
Are you not too old to have prams to throw toys from?
As a final point, its beyond ironic that after my alleged (accidental) misdemeanor, you have thrown way more potentially offensive remarks back at me. Do two wrongs make a right?
In Response to Re: My worst beat ever I would say! : Whilst it is unfortunate that you got bored reading my post, imo it is the height of arrogance to to dictate how long another forum members post should be. You may wish to debate this point and claim childish put down, which I will entertain. Though to be honest, I think the label of arrogance is maginally more appealing, but each to their own. The location of this post is bye the bye. You made a statement that said: "Only a complete tool would try and give advice on this hand". You did not address any of the issues that I raised about the potential for discussion on the above hand. You are merely trying to reverse out of the back door by using the locality of this post as a get out clause. I did originally place you as of one of the sharper members of this forum. Having had recent direct communications with you, you now strike me as the ilk that rather than being able to form reasoned counter points, just reverts to doging the issue. A long and prosperous career in politics awaits. Should you care to put forward your reasoning to why this hand could not be discussed in more detail, [sic] my previous comment, then I am all ears....... Posted by calcalfold
Mate? is something wrong with you?
Dont go taking this imaginary morale high ground youve seemed to have established yourself on.
She has not but this up for advice, she is not even looking for a UL she is just trying to share the hand as a point of interest.
In Response to Re: My worst beat ever I would say! : Mate? is something wrong with you? Dont go taking this imaginary morale high ground youve seemed to have established yourself on. She has not but this up for advice, she is not even looking for a UL she is just trying to share the hand as a point of interest. So just chill Posted by bolly580
Bolly, granted it was a long post. I was just trying to explain that every hand can be commented in with regards line taken - that was my point.
I appreciate she wasnt looking for advice, but I had not actually given any either.
It was purely her opinion (that advice is irrelevant for the above hand) that I was disagreeing with. Which, you will see, she could not refute.
In Response to Re: My worst beat ever I would say! : Wasn't that difficult to find the rationale,,, just go over the drivel you've posted on this thread Posted by 1281
Why is it most people on here are unable to back up anything they say with relevant evidence?
Please explain why what I have said on this thread can be used to prove that I an an idiot at the poker tables. How can I be an idiot at the tables when I have opted out of the chat feature. What makes me an idiot? betting x amount with pocket pairs? not double barrelling?
What you have said is the equivalent of saying, for example, Eric Cantona is an idiot with regards to playing football because he acts like a moron off the pitch, or arranges press conferences just to stick one to the media.
Im not even going to defend against the other points you made, I am first to admit that I understand why you have reached the opinion that you have.
1) I can understand why you might consider me an "idiot" at the forums based on my posting style, but I speak my mind and it matters not one jot your opinion of me.
2) If you want to assume what I am like in real life, fine, again I care not.
But with regards my conduct at the tables; I still await a proper answer. And rather than just saying either
i) You just are ii) I dont want to discuss this further iii) I dont want to waste time on you
Please either give some evidence based on my play, or admit that, ok yeah, it was an assumption but not based on anything poker related.
Yea I know again this a long and unecessary post. But if you are going sl@g me off, at least back it up when challenged.
Why not just let this one drop? I don't agree with a lot of what you post but that's irrelevant really. You're clearly intelligent and so you must realise that you're just going to end up getting a ban if you continue with the tone of your posts.
CalCalfold Why not just let this one drop? I don't agree with a lot of what you post but that's irrelevant really. You're clearly intelligent and so you must realise that you're just going to end up getting a ban if you continue with the tone of your posts. Posted by Jac35
Evening Jac
Whilst I fully see where you are coming from, understand that my mistake re Batkin was an error of judgement, and also appreciate your kind comment.
If I get a ban for challenging people and asking others to back up their points then thats just how it goes.
As I have said, yes I do make off the cuff comments, but I will always explain my thought process, often to the exasperation of others if asked to, I just expect others to do the same when challenged.
I do take your comments on board and as such I will stop posting on this thread unless 1281 is able to give me anything of substance in relation to his claim. So in other words, I am pretty confident this will be my last post.
Comments
You are quite right, I should have been given 30years in Parkhurst for my crimes against humanity.
"I will do you a favour as you clearly want the last word and leave the final post to yourself."
Very kind of you
"I would like to confirm however I reported what you said as it was disgusting and vile"
You go girl
"I hope one day you realise what a pathetic person you are."
A generalisation based on what exactly.
"Hopefully we will meet one day and we can see if you are as confident in person which I am pretty sure will be the complete opposite as is with most forum trolls."
Sorry, your inability to form reasoned debates mean I think you would not stimulate me intellectually, if we meet by accident then so be it.
"Again I will not reply to your next post not only because it will probably bore me to death but also as you clearly want the last word like the child you have shown yourself as."
Blimey, I would hate to have dared say something intentionally offensive, I presume you would had have me deported by now.
"Enter your reply below (Make it as sarcastic and as funny as possible to smother your own ego as you will likely be the only one reading"
Challenge accepted
"Kalie (Female age 25) xx"
Are you not too old to have prams to throw toys from?
As a final point, its beyond ironic that after my alleged (accidental) misdemeanor, you have thrown way more potentially offensive remarks back at me. Do two wrongs make a right?
Best
ccf
#Assumptions
We are not worthy.
I would love to hear the rationale behind this, please, do proceed..........
#youknowitstrue
I appreciate she wasnt looking for advice, but I had not actually given any either.
It was purely her opinion (that advice is irrelevant for the above hand) that I was disagreeing with. Which, you will see, she could not refute.
Why is it most people on here are unable to back up anything they say with relevant evidence?
Please explain why what I have said on this thread can be used to prove that I an an idiot at the poker tables. How can I be an idiot at the tables when I have opted out of the chat feature. What makes me an idiot? betting x amount with pocket pairs? not double barrelling?
What you have said is the equivalent of saying, for example, Eric Cantona is an idiot with regards to playing football because he acts like a moron off the pitch, or arranges press conferences just to stick one to the media.
Im not even going to defend against the other points you made, I am first to admit that I understand why you have reached the opinion that you have.
1) I can understand why you might consider me an "idiot" at the forums based on my posting style, but I speak my mind and it matters not one jot your opinion of me.
2) If you want to assume what I am like in real life, fine, again I care not.
But with regards my conduct at the tables; I still await a proper answer. And rather than just saying either
i) You just are
ii) I dont want to discuss this further
iii) I dont want to waste time on you
Please either give some evidence based on my play, or admit that, ok yeah, it was an assumption but not based on anything poker related.
Yea I know again this a long and unecessary post. But if you are going sl@g me off, at least back it up when challenged.
Why not just let this one drop?
I don't agree with a lot of what you post but that's irrelevant really.
You're clearly intelligent and so you must realise that you're just going to end up getting a ban if you continue with the tone of your posts.
Whilst I fully see where you are coming from, understand that my mistake re Batkin was an error of judgement, and also appreciate your kind comment.
If I get a ban for challenging people and asking others to back up their points then thats just how it goes.
As I have said, yes I do make off the cuff comments, but I will always explain my thought process, often to the exasperation of others if asked to, I just expect others to do the same when challenged.
I do take your comments on board and as such I will stop posting on this thread unless 1281 is able to give me anything of substance in relation to his claim. So in other words, I am pretty confident this will be my last post.
Best
CCF