All Categories› Poker Chat

You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Hosts

Tuddy16Tuddy16 Member Posts: 3
edited January 2014 in Poker Chat
Im a regular player and watcher of sky poker, so can anyone tell me why they have so called experts like Tikay and ryan spittles analyising hands when they clearly arnt good enough to say what we should be doing? Tikay openly admits he is not a NLHE player and Ryan spittles is no better than the rest of us!! Watched him on sky poker cash game live play and he is awful, just my opinion mind :) 
· Share on Twitter
«134

Comments

  • FCHDFCHD Member Posts: 3,178
    edited January 2014
    Ryan's results in tournaments recently would say otherwise
    · Share on Twitter
  • cenachavcenachav Member Posts: 2,682
    edited January 2014
    I wish I was as awful as Ryan!
    · Share on Twitter
  • Tuddy16Tuddy16 Member Posts: 3
    edited January 2014
    Anyone can be a good analyiser when u see the hole cards, dont rate his play at all, notice no one defending Tikay!!

    · Share on Twitter
  • hhyftrftdrhhyftrftdr Member Posts: 8,036
    edited January 2014
    So you also have cashes from various tournaments including the WSOP, EPT, WPT, SPT, GUKPT, UKIPT? 
    · Share on Twitter
  • cenachavcenachav Member Posts: 2,682
    edited January 2014
    Tikay, as well as being a top all around man has forgotton more about poker then most of us will ever know and could take the majority of us to school
    · Share on Twitter
  • LARSON7LARSON7 Member Posts: 4,495
    edited January 2014
    OP they do a great job.

    Don't really understand the point of your thread.
    · Share on Twitter
  • SlipwaterSlipwater Member Posts: 3,664
    edited January 2014
    In Response to Hosts:
    Im a regular player and watcher of sky poker, so can anyone tell me why they have so called experts like Tikay and ryan spittles analyising hands when they clearly arnt good enough to say what we should be doing? Tikay openly admits he is not a NLHE player and Ryan spittles is no better than the rest of us!! Watched him on sky poker cash game live play and he is awful, just my opinion mind :) 
    Posted by Tuddy16
    Quote of the day, in bold.

    Lol.
    · Share on Twitter
  • rainman397rainman397 Member Posts: 1,394
    edited January 2014
    be quiet you rude little man
    · Share on Twitter
  • VespaPXVespaPX Member Posts: 12,487
    edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Hosts:
    Tikay, as well as being a top all around man has forgotton more about poker then most of us will ever know and could take the majority of us to school
    Posted by cenachav
    +1
    · Share on Twitter
  • VespaPXVespaPX Member Posts: 12,487
    edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Hosts:
    Anyone can be a good analyiser when u see the hole cards, dont rate his play at all, notice no one defending Tikay!!
    Posted by Tuddy16
    No one agreeing with you either.
    · Share on Twitter
  • BUFCBUFC Member Posts: 328
    edited January 2014
    Can only assume that this guy has had a big Sunday session watching the football up his local. Must be drunk making comments like this!
    · Share on Twitter
  • BigBlusterBigBluster Member Posts: 1,075
    edited January 2014
    In Response to Hosts:
    Ryan spittles is no better than the rest of us!! 
    Posted by Tuddy16
    Ryan is certainly a lot better then the rest of us and would tear most players a new @rse. 
    He only struggled in those cash games for 2 reasons: he was playing against very good players and, most importantly, there were only about 200 hands played and in only 200 hands cards dominate, not skill.


    · Share on Twitter
  • scotty77scotty77 Member Posts: 4,970
    edited January 2014
    Finally been found out!

    Trust funds ftw

    :)
    · Share on Twitter
  • THEROCK573THEROCK573 Member Posts: 2,550
    edited January 2014
    In Response to Hosts:
    Im a regular player and watcher of sky poker, so can anyone tell me why they have so called experts like Tikay and ryan spittles analyising hands when they clearly arnt good enough to say what we should be doing? Tikay openly admits he is not a NLHE player and Ryan spittles is no better than the rest of us!! Watched him on sky poker cash game live play and he is awful, just my opinion mind :) 
    Posted by Tuddy16
    very disrespectful post, he makes a living playing poker, thats not an easy thing to do you know or perhaps you could do it if you had the bankroll ( yeah were have i heard that one before .) . no idea what his cash game is like becauses i dont play cash but hes very good at mtts and more than qualififed to give advice to the type of audience sky poker has!!!
    · Share on Twitter
  • DiminuendoDiminuendo Member Posts: 222
    edited January 2014
    In Response to Hosts:
    Im a regular player and watcher of sky poker, so can anyone tell me why they have so called experts like Tikay and ryan spittles analyising hands when they clearly arnt good enough to say what we should be doing? Tikay openly admits he is not a NLHE player and Ryan spittles is no better than the rest of us!! Watched him on sky poker cash game live play and he is awful, just my opinion mind :) 
    Posted by Tuddy16

    Best bit of advice i could offer you is that in poker you will make the majority of your cash off players worse than yourself and because you clearly have an edge over Ryan the best thing for you to do would be to sit down v him as often as possible and watch your bankroll grow mate

    GL with that :)

    As for Tikay well "stop picking on pensioners "  :)
    · Share on Twitter
  • LARSON7LARSON7 Member Posts: 4,495
    edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Hosts:
    In Response to Hosts : Best bit of advice i could offer you is that in poker you will make the majority of your cash off players worse than yourself and because you clearly have an edge over Ryan the best thing for you to do would be to sit down v him as often as possible and watch your bankroll grow mate GL with that :)
    Posted by Diminuendo
    lol
    · Share on Twitter
  • peter27peter27 Member Posts: 1,634
    edited January 2014
    In Response to Hosts:
    when they clearly arnt good enough to say what we should be doing?
    Posted by Tuddy16
    Their poker credentials say otherwise. However, if your poker credentials are better than theirs then your negative opinion could be taken seriously. Please tell us all what major tournaments you've won/cashed in.

    This is a very rude, misguided and disrespectful post. You also come off as pretty dumb to be honest ... you say you are a regular watcher of Sky Poker TV, despite thinking the analysis is rubbish - so essentially you watch something you don't like? Makes sense.

    Please go to a different site if you don't like what is offer on here.
    · Share on Twitter
  • jordz16jordz16 Member Posts: 2,253
    edited January 2014
    Can we please get Tuddy on the show soon? Cardblockers at the ready.


    · Share on Twitter
  • a00rocka00rock Member Posts: 832
    edited January 2014
    With all due respect the OP is entitled to his opinion regardless of how misguided he may be.

    The shows themselves are 5hrs long minus 25 mins for breaks IMHO anyone who can keep an audience interested for this amount of time is excellent at their job and both the aforementioned analysts have no problems in this area.

    It is a show after all and about entertainment too. The interaction between the presenters and analysts and the audience is second to none in my view and unique on TV.

    If I am totally honest I don't always agree with everything the analysts say but their poker achievements should at the very least entitle them to respect for their views, something that seems to be lacking in the OP views.
    · Share on Twitter
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,843
    edited January 2014
    In Response to Re: Hosts:
    With all due respect the OP is entitled to his opinion regardless of how misguided he may be. The shows themselves are 5hrs long minus 25 mins for breaks IMHO anyone who can keep an audience interested for this amount of time is excellent at their job and both the aforementioned annalists have no problems in this area. It is a show after all and about entertainment too. The interaction between the presenters and annalists and the audience is second to none in my view and unique on TV. If I am totally honest I don't always agree with everything the annalists say but their poker achievements should at the very least entitle them to respect for their views, something that seems to be lacking in the OP views.
    Posted by a00rock
    Yes, I absolutely agree he is entitled to his opinion, & I'll reply to him shortly.

    I am a little concerned with your suggestion that we are annalists though. I rather prefer Analysts, though     I suppose some may think you were correct.....;)
    · Share on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.