You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

30BB am i better off to just wait for a hand with jamming potential than call 3xBB with this

craigcu12craigcu12 Member Posts: 3,962
edited February 2014 in The Poker Clinic
robert369 Small blind   150.00 150.00 9760.00
Omen69 Big blind   300.00 450.00 8700.00
  Your hole cards
  • Q
  • K
     
timbobingo Fold        
x Raise   900.00 1350.00 5122.50
BANKIT Fold        
craigcu12 Call   900.00 2250.00 8375.00
robert369 Fold        
Omen69 Fold        
Flop
   
  • J
  • 5
  • 5
     
x Bet   1125.00 3375.00 3997.50
craigcu12 Fold
«13

Comments

  • hhyftrftdrhhyftrftdr Member Posts: 8,036
    edited February 2014
    Effective stack is only 20bb. Pretty hand. In position. I would be tempted to peel as well. Though it's probably just a fold pre, not really playing deep enough to make it worthwhile.

    Type of hand where we typically win a small pot or lose a large one.
  • BigBlusterBigBluster Member Posts: 1,075
    edited February 2014
    I just composed a long and complicated mathematical reply examining ranges, stack sizes, c-bets, 2nd barrels and so on. Unfortunately; it took me so long to work it all out that my login expired and my post disappeared into the ether!

    To summarise: playing it as you did (which is exactly the same way I would have played it) is a mathematically incorrect play. It typically loses 225 chips.

    I'm surprised at this as the play feels right.


  • Lambert180Lambert180 Member Posts: 12,197
    edited February 2014
    Agree with Harryffyrytert, with these stack sizes it's just a fold pre imo (as much as it sucks). 
  • GaryQQQGaryQQQ Member Posts: 6,804
    edited February 2014
    Unless the villain is uber-tight this is never a fold. You're only in trouble against AK, AQ, and pairs QQ+, that's just 3.77% of all hands.

    If we give the villain even a fairly tight range, say all pairs 55+, ATo+, A8s+, KQ, KJ, QJ  you have a massive 46% equity preflop.

    A 3-bet shove is probably better than a call against aggresive opponents who are going to put you under pressure post-flop. 

    Another option, if you've got the balls for it, and your image isn't that of a maniac, is to flat call pre-flop then shove over the c-bet on any non-ace flop, hit or miss. A big part of his range will be forced to fold including ace-high hands and small/mid pairs that would have called a pre-flop shove and are still ahead now, you'll still have outs against most holdings if called.
  • Lambert180Lambert180 Member Posts: 12,197
    edited February 2014
    That's the prob tho Gary, we have that equity against his opening range but not even close to that against his range if he calls our shove imo.

    I'd be much more inclined to peel pre if he had minraised but think we've got too little room to move postflop V a 3x. Even his half pot cbet here leaves him barely a PSB left and we'll probably struggle to get him off nearly any pair/draw
  • TeddyBloatTeddyBloat Member Posts: 1,419
    edited February 2014
    If villain has been opening wide then you can exploit his 3x sizing by jamming. Id say KQs is plenty good enough.
  • THEROCK573THEROCK573 Member Posts: 2,550
    edited February 2014
    looks a much more sexual hand than it is, id ship it or bin it.
  • craigcu12craigcu12 Member Posts: 3,962
    edited February 2014

    i had only just moved onto this table so i didn't know enough about him and his 3betting, so going my standard thinking it
    seem to be like wasting chips doing it with QJ and KJ as he would be in big trouble vs most of the jams and if he folds then he has wasted 3bb.

  • BorinLonerBorinLoner Member Posts: 3,863
    edited February 2014
    Shoving would seem bad.

    The effective stack when the action comes to us pre-flop is not 20BB, it's 30BB. We still have two players yet to act that have us covered. So our shove would be a 30BB shove which, when called, has us in all kinds of problems. Anyway, as Lambert has said, when we shove 20BB and are called we're probably in trouble with KQ. I don't see how we can shove profitably unless we think we're either going to be called really light or get folds an absolutely huge proportion of the time.

    This is why we need some information on our opponent.


    We can call pre-flop if we think villain's 3x range in EP is relatively light and he's going to stack off light post-flop. So we need our one-pair hands to be good a high proportion of the time. KQ is a pretty strong one-pair making hand. Alternatively, if he's just going to play face-up post-flop and check-fold lots, even as the pre-flop aggressor, then we can call.



    With no reads, it's probably best to assign a nitty range for the 3x in early position from 20BB. That would lead to a bit of an annoying fold. However, if we've been at the table with this player for even a couple of orbits, we should have some idea of his range.
  • craigcu12craigcu12 Member Posts: 3,962
    edited February 2014
    this was his second hand on this table so it was impossible for me to know him.
  • BigBlusterBigBluster Member Posts: 1,075
    edited February 2014
    In Response to Re: 30BB am i better off to just wait for a hand with jamming potential than call 3xBB with this:
    Unless the villain is uber-tight this is never a fold. You're only in trouble against AK, AQ, and pairs QQ+, that's just 3.77% of all hands. If we give the villain even a fairly tight range, say all pairs 55+, ATo+, A8s+, KQ, KJ, QJ  you have a massive 46% equity preflop. 
    Posted by GaryQQQ
    I disagree. Your percentages are clearly correct if running hands hot and cold, but we're not doing that: we're playing poker.
    If we assume that 100% of the time the villain will c-bet and also that we will fold if we miss (I think these are quite reasonable assumptions), then we're not looking good against many hands at all. 2/3rds the time we miss the flop and fold. As the raiser was in front of us you could easily put him on a hand that dominates us, so of the 1/3rd that we hit we could still lose our entire stack.
    As mentioned above, I did the sums and this is actually a -EV play. I'm amazed at this because our hand is so strong and I would never fold here.

    {This all assumes that we call - maybe a strong re-raise would be better. I suspect that a shove would be -EV but haven't done the sums}.


  • GaryQQQGaryQQQ Member Posts: 6,804
    edited February 2014
    If KQs isn't a hand with jamming potential I don't know what is.

    Are you guys advocating we blind out while waiting for JJ+ or AK only? Waiting for premiums when shallow is not the way to win MTTs.

    My prefered play here is to flat call, then shove on 100% of non-ace flops, hit or miss. I expect enough folds (and enough equity when called) to make this a profitable play.

    We will win on ace-high flops sometimes too. For example the villain may to too scared to fire at say an AJ2 flop if he holds pairs 33-TT.
  • 77Chris9177Chris91 Member Posts: 375
    edited February 2014
    In Response to Re: 30BB am i better off to just wait for a hand with jamming potential than call 3xBB with this:
    If KQs isn't a hand with jamming potential I don't know what is. Are you guys advocating we blind out while waiting for JJ+ or AK only? Waiting for premiums when shallow is not the way to win MTTs. My prefered play here is to flat call, then shove on 100% of non-ace flops, hit or miss. I expect enough folds (and enough equity when called) to make this a profitable play. We will win on ace-high flops sometimes too. For example the villain may to too scared to fire at say an AJ2 flop if he holds pairs 33-TT.
    Posted by GaryQQQ
    Agree with flatting.

    Shoving 100% of non A high flops just cannot be profitable. Your shoving here on a 7h8h9h board?
  • GaryQQQGaryQQQ Member Posts: 6,804
    edited February 2014
    In Response to Re: 30BB am i better off to just wait for a hand with jamming potential than call 3xBB with this:
    That's the prob tho Gary, we have that equity against his opening range but not even close to that against his range if he calls our shove imo. Posted by Lambert180
    You don't have to be ahead or flipping against the villains raise/calling range to make the shove profitable.

    To simplify the maths I've assumed 20BB effective stacks exactly. I'm gonna give the villain the same opening range as above and a fairly tight raise/calling range of TT+, AK, AQs, KQs. That puts 79 possible raise/folding combos in his range, 42 raise/calling combos (both with KQcc removed).

    We shove 20BB with 4.5BB in the pot.

    79/121 or 65.3% of the time our shove gets a fold and makes 4.5BB profit.

    42/121 or 34.7% of the time we are called.

    Our KQs has 45.18% equity against the villains calling range.

    When called there is 41.5BB in the pot, our 45.18% equity is worth 18.75BB , so our called shove loses 1.25BB on average.

    (65.3% x 4.5BB) + (34.7% x -1.25BB) = +2.5BB

    So using the ranges above a shove shows a 2.5 big blinds profit. Folding shows zero profit.

    Shoving and winning also sets us up to make a run at winning this thing. Nobody ever wins a tournament by folding. You can't go on a heater when you fold. In tournaments he who dares wins (disclaimer; he who dares wins in the long run, though not every time).

    Tinkering with the calling range won't make much difference; if you make it tighter we have less equity when called, though that is balanced by the fact that we get more folds too.

    Very occasionally one of the blinds will wake up with a calling hand, though this won't happen nearly enough to make a significant dent in our +2.5BB average profit.
  • hhyftrftdrhhyftrftdr Member Posts: 8,036
    edited February 2014
    In Response to Re: 30BB am i better off to just wait for a hand with jamming potential than call 3xBB with this:
    If KQs isn't a hand with jamming potential I don't know what is. Are you guys advocating we blind out while waiting for JJ+ or AK only? Waiting for premiums when shallow is not the way to win MTTs. My prefered play here is to flat call, then shove on 100% of non-ace flops, hit or miss. I expect enough folds (and enough equity when called) to make this a profitable play. We will win on ace-high flops sometimes too. For example the villain may to too scared to fire at say an AJ2 flop if he holds pairs 33-TT.
    Posted by GaryQQQ
    We have 30bb, hardly a case of blinding out.

    Really not convinced by shoving any none A high flops. If the board fell AJ2 and they check their 33-1010 hands to us, why on earth would we need to shove? A standard bet in position will often just do the trick and take the pot. 

    Might end up value owning yourself as a decent villain should/will query why you would just jam an ace, and it's unlikely you ship a bare J.

    Could just be trying to level us all I suppose ;)
  • craigcu12craigcu12 Member Posts: 3,962
    edited February 2014
    In Response to Re: 30BB am i better off to just wait for a hand with jamming potential than call 3xBB with this:
    If KQs isn't a hand with jamming potential I don't know what is. Are you guys advocating we blind out while waiting for JJ+ or AK only? Waiting for premiums when shallow is not the way to win MTTs. My prefered play here is to flat call, then shove on 100% of non-ace flops, hit or miss. I expect enough folds (and enough equity when called) to make this a profitable play. We will win on ace-high flops sometimes too. For example the villain may to too scared to fire at say an AJ2 flop if he holds pairs 33-TT.
    Posted by GaryQQQ

    it's not that we wanting to wait for premiums and Ak or AQ before doing anything, what makes this appear to be such a big risk is the opening bet he choose to use preflop when he was UTG+1 and if someone does a shove i'm sure he will want to call now that he has did a raise of 3xBB.

    if he is 3xBB preflop UTG+2 he knows their is still 2 that could call who would be in position so again if he is going to raise preflop and the flop were to come AJx if he is then going to check with 22-1010 then the last thing he wants to be doing is raising 3xBB because a raise that size and he is sure to either get 77+ AJ+ or KQs.
  • iFeeshiFeesh Member Posts: 7
    edited February 2014
    KQs looks nice, but in this situation it's no better than 45s, maybe even worse.
    What I mean is, if you play the hand, you have to treat it as any other suited connector, you are playing for a straight or flush, since when you hit a K high flop or Q high flop, the only action your'e likely to get is from AK/AQ or better.

    With these stack sizes, you are better off folding. Being in position is of little significance when you don't have the chips to make moves.
    If you flop an open ended straight or flush draw, and your opponent pots it, you cannot fold.
    Now you either have to shove with potentially 40% equity, or flat for 1/3 of your stack (in total) and face calling all in at the turn with 20% equity. (Assuming you miss).

    And those are the scenarios IF you even flop a big draw.
    I like playing suited connectors, but at this stage in the tourney, it has to be a fold.

    Also, the way your opponent played it suggests he has JJ/QQ/KK/AA. His bet sizing shows he is willing to get it in, but doesn't want to scare to off.
  • GaryQQQGaryQQQ Member Posts: 6,804
    edited February 2014
    In Response to Re: 30BB am i better off to just wait for a hand with jamming potential than call 3xBB with this:
    His bet sizing shows he is willing to get it in, but doesn't want to scare to off.
    Posted by iFeesh
    I disagree, I consider a 3x open from a 20BB stack a scared bet that doesn't want to have see a flop. I think his range could arguably be capped to exclude AA, KK, QQ, AK.
  • GaryQQQGaryQQQ Member Posts: 6,804
    edited February 2014
    In Response to Re: 30BB am i better off to just wait for a hand with jamming potential than call 3xBB with this:
    Really not convinced by shoving any none A high flops. If the board fell AJ2 and they check their 33-1010 hands to us, why on earth would we need to shove?
    Posted by hhyftrftdr
    AJ2 is not a non-ace flop!
  • GaryQQQGaryQQQ Member Posts: 6,804
    edited February 2014
    Who posted words to the effect of 'surely you wouldn't jam on a Th9h8h flop' then deleted it?

    Yes, I 100% would. My hand strength is irrelevant to my decision to shove on any non-ace flop, I'm only thinking of the villains hand-strenth. That flop is 10x more likely to be super-scary to the villain than it is to help him.

    Nobody was putting JQ, TJ, T9, 98, 76 or similar in his 3x opening range. Can he call there with AK, or any other ace-high hand without a heart?
Sign In or Register to comment.