You are saying someone who 1 tables low limit dyms for 12 hours a day is more loyal than a high stakes cash player who 12 tables for 6 hours every evening?? its ridiculous. loyalty and minutes spent at the tables are not something that run in conjunction with eachother so you really dont make any sense.. Rake is the money that you pay sky to play on the site, i dont see why someone who pays £50 in rake should get the same reward as someone paying £5000.. i dont even hardly play cash or get involved with rake races but i just want to see actual fair promotions on this site Posted by jordz16
No, but I am saying that doing it based on time would be a fairer way of doing it because not everyone can afford high stakes, but everyone is capable of devoting time.
I agree that players who pay more rake should get bigger benefits, that goes without saying. I am not saying that every promotion should be based on time, but a few should be because there are some very loyal players at the lower stakes who pretty much get no benefit from promotions ..
I would bring back the Poker League.............you know, the option that was winner by a country mile the last time you asked a similar question yet just seemed to ignore. My question. Why ask??? Posted by waller02
I've seen this mentioned somewhere before, but I joined Sky Poker after the poker league was going - would be interested to know how it worked if someone wouldn't mind explaining? :-)
Comments
I agree that players who pay more rake should get bigger benefits, that goes without saying. I am not saying that every promotion should be based on time, but a few should be because there are some very loyal players at the lower stakes who pretty much get no benefit from promotions ..
In Response to Re: Your preference on promo qualification: I've seen this mentioned somewhere before, but I joined Sky Poker after the poker league was going - would be interested to know how it worked if someone wouldn't mind explaining? :-)