You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Micro Stakes

12811281 Member Posts: 241
edited June 2016 in Poker Chat
Need a break from it. Play the 7.15 & 7.45 deepstacks most nights and basically the standard of play if awful. Try playing the correct way but its impossible to do so against players with no fold button. I know there's guides on here to crush the microstakes but sorry it doesnt make a difference if the player who has limp called your raise hasnt read the same book. Plus, my anger in chatbox is getting out of hand so think its time for a little break to recharge the batteries.
«1

Comments

  • Itsover4uItsover4u Member Posts: 1,538
    edited June 2016
    poker is about adjustments mate... adjust to your enviroment and the players around you.

    Playing an optimal strategy at these limits is not as effective as an exploitable strategy.

    Exploiting bad tendancy's = £££

    Best of luck

    Danny
  • percival09percival09 Member Posts: 3,804
    edited June 2016
    Itsover, slight error in your post: nothing is more effective than an optimal strategy... I know what you mean though, just had to point it out.

    1281, perhaps try working on your own game before just slating the standard of play in a micro stakes tournament where players are just having a bit of fun. Also, be careful not to fool yourself too much. You might think you're playing well, but odds are if you're struggling to turn a profit in micro stakes games, and then bashing your opponents on the forum, you're probably not playing quite as well as you think you are. Good luck recharging the batteries. 
  • CATCH-22CATCH-22 Member Posts: 270
    edited June 2016
    7 45 ds is not as easy as u might think.  Invite all to come and try it

  • 12811281 Member Posts: 241
    edited June 2016
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes:
    Itsover, slight error in your post: nothing is more effective than an optimal strategy... I know what you mean though, just had to point it out. 1281, perhaps try working on your own game before just slating the standard of play in a micro stakes tournament where players are just having a bit of fun. Also, be careful not to fool yourself too much. You might think you're playing well, but odds are if you're struggling to turn a profit in micro stakes games, and then bashing your opponents on the forum, you're probably not playing quite as well as you think you are. Good luck recharging the batteries. 
    Posted by percival09
    By adjusting my own game against these players do you mean just limp with them, or start raising x5+ pre to hopefully shake them off. Not sure what stakes will currently play but I'd welcome you to try them out for a few days. With regulars who I've played with for years it's become something of a running joke the standard of play you deal with most nights. 
  • Itsover4uItsover4u Member Posts: 1,538
    edited June 2016
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes:
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes : By adjusting my own game against these players do you mean just limp with them, or start raising x5+ pre to hopefully shake them off. Not sure what stakes will currently play but I'd welcome you to try them out for a few days. With regulars who I've played with for years it's become something of a running joke the standard of play you deal with most nights. 
    Posted by 1281
    Min raise when opening

    Limp pairs (only at these stakes) decent players will work out pairs to be a limp range

    When you hit dont try and trap.... if they are as fishy as you say just lead out for 80% of the pot (if the board changes how strong your hand is slow down)


  • 12811281 Member Posts: 241
    edited June 2016
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes:
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes : Min raise when opening Limp pairs (only at these stakes) decent players will work out pairs to be a limp range When you hit dont try and trap.... if they are as fishy as you say just lead out for 80% of the pot (if the board changes how strong your hand is slow down)
    Posted by Itsover4u
    I'd never min raise 9's above because 90% of the time it'll just encourage 5 callers. Nice one for the reply btw. This whole post is just born out of frustration. Won the 7.45 sometime last week and seemed to be getting in a groove, but then get a table dynamic like I had last night and just makes you think why do I bother. I fully understand it's lame whinging about beats & certain playing styles but when it's almost every night it just becomes a tad sole destroying. 
  • aussie09aussie09 Member Posts: 8,033
    edited June 2016
    In Response to Micro Stakes:
    Need a break from it. Play the 7.15 & 7.45 deepstacks most nights and basically the standard of play if awful. Try playing the correct way but its impossible to do so against players with no fold button. I know there's guides on here to crush the microstakes but sorry it doesnt make a difference if the player who has limp called your raise hasnt read the same book. Plus, my anger in chatbox is getting out of hand so think its time for a little break to recharge the batteries.
    Posted by 1281

    i don't know whether i can help or not.  here's my guess.  it isn't meant to be critical, but food for thought.  it is more likely to be wrong than right.  but it might be right.

    it might be that you are a reasonably competent player experienced in traditional games and knowledgeable about things that were most important 10 years ago.  however, the game has changed.  you are still playing a test match style in a 20/20 match.  you may still be a competent batsman but you cannot succeed unless you strike out more frequently.  the small stakes you play has only magnified this change. 

    you are still as good as player as you ever were, but you need to grow now.

    good luck.



  • 12811281 Member Posts: 241
    edited June 2016
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes:
    In Response to Micro Stakes : i don't know whether i can help or not.  here's my guess.  it isn't meant to be critical, but food for thought.  it is more likely to be wrong than right.  but it might be right. it might be that you are a reasonably competent player experienced in traditional games and knowledgeable about things that were most important 10 years ago.  however, the game has changed.  you are still playing a test match style in a 20/20 match.  you may still be a competent batsman but you cannot succeed unless you strike out more frequently.  the small stakes you play has only magnified this change.  you are still as good as player as you ever were, but you need to grow now. good luck.
    Posted by aussie09
    Thanks for the reply and I do know the angle you're coming from. Do I class myself a good player? Not really on the basis that after 5 years I'm still not crushing microstakes. But that said, on occasions when I play the DTDs on Monday when you come up against better players I more than hold my own, and on the fewer occasions when I've satellited into the roller and cashed. Personally I feel it's more leaning towards my mental attitude once I see what I hate at the table. Last night was the perfect example and again I know it's terribly bad form to complain about isolated incidents but when you're at 200/400 15/34 with QQ on the button after a limped pot.... 

    Wait, before I explain what occurred someone tell me what play they would take. 

    If I'm coming across as spikey in my replies I'm sincerely sorry. 

  • MattBatesMattBates Member Posts: 4,118
    edited June 2016
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes:
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes : Thanks for the reply and I do know the angle you're coming from. Do I class myself a good player? Not really on the basis that after 5 years I'm still not crushing microstakes. But that said, on occasions when I play the DTDs on Monday when you come up against better players I more than hold my own, and on the fewer occasions when I've satellited into the roller and cashed. Personally I feel it's more leaning towards my mental attitude once I see what I hate at the table. Last night was the perfect example and again I know it's terribly bad form to complain about isolated incidents but when you're at 200/400 15/34 with QQ on the button after a limped pot....  Wait, before I explain what occurred someone tell me what play they would take.  If I'm coming across as spikey in my replies I'm sincerely sorry. 
    Posted by 1281
    Whats our stack? Whats the limpers stack? What range do you put the limper on? What are the sb and bb stacks?
  • aussie09aussie09 Member Posts: 8,033
    edited June 2016
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes:
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes : Thanks for the reply and I do know the angle you're coming from. Do I class myself a good player? Not really on the basis that after 5 years I'm still not crushing microstakes. But that said, on occasions when I play the DTDs on Monday when you come up against better players I more than hold my own, and on the fewer occasions when I've satellited into the roller and cashed. Personally I feel it's more leaning towards my mental attitude once I see what I hate at the table. Last night was the perfect example and again I know it's terribly bad form to complain about isolated incidents but when you're at 200/400 15/34 with QQ on the button after a limped pot....  Wait, before I explain what occurred someone tell me what play they would take.  If I'm coming across as spikey in my replies I'm sincerely sorry. 
    Posted by 1281

    hi 1281.  my point is that the game is no longer what you want it to be.  all will be resolved when you apply your skill and experience differently in this new environment.



     


  • 12811281 Member Posts: 241
    edited June 2016
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes:
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes : hi 1281.  my point is that the game is no longer what you want it to be.  all will be resolved when you apply your skill and experience differently in this new environment.  
    Posted by aussie09

    Hi, Rob isn't it? 
    Honestly I know we you're coming coming from but I'm a firm believer at those stakes min raise just encourages more action. Against a better player in different circumstances then absolutely. 
  • 12811281 Member Posts: 241
    edited June 2016
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes:
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes : Whats our stack? Whats the limpers stack? What range do you put the limper on? What are the sb and bb stacks?
    Posted by MattBates
    Matt, 
    My stake: 13.4k
    UTG+1 has me covered slightly 
    Next: far less than me & average
    Both blinds are regs and around my chip stack
    Honestly re both limpers, any two cards. This was evident in some of the ridiculous pots they'd been picking up all night. 





  • 12811281 Member Posts: 241
    edited June 2016
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes:
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes : Whats our stack? Whats the limpers stack? What range do you put the limper on? What are the sb and bb stacks?
    Posted by MattBates
    Matt, 
    My stake: 13.4k
    UTG+1 has me covered slightly 
    Next: far less than me & average
    Both blinds are regs and around my chip stack
    Honestly re both limpers, any two cards. This was evident in some of the ridiculous pots they'd been picking up all night. 





  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH Member Posts: 17,929
    edited June 2016
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes:
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes : Matt,  My stake: 13.4k UTG+1 has me covered slightly  Next: far less than me & average Both blinds are regs and around my chip stack Honestly re both limpers, any two cards. This was evident in some of the ridiculous pots they'd been picking up all night. 
    Posted by 1281
    It sounds like these opponents are causing you all sorts of problems and making it hard for you to win.

    Isn't that the aim of the game?

    You are trying to figure out a way to beat them and their aim is to make it hard for you, not easy. 


  • 12811281 Member Posts: 241
    edited June 2016
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes:
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes : It sounds like these opponents are causing you all sorts of problems and making it hard for you to win. Isn't that the aim of the game? You are trying to figure out a way to beat them and their aim is to make it hard for you, not easy. 
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH
    Doh, if so they aren't doing it on a personal level, it's just the way some at this level but I don't need to tell you that. No doubt you've come through this stage. See it every night at this level, limp calling then you've either out bet them with the best hand, or slow down and wait for the pot sized bet on the river. 

  • thefa1lacythefa1lacy Member Posts: 201
    edited June 2016
    You cant analyse these games too much. If a player has more chips than you, they'll be playing any old trash with no connection whatsoever. They got big that way in the first place, then they keep hitting and getting bigger, so they'll carry on with cards that make no sense to the board. 

    Don't forget minimum wage is now £7.20 an hour unless you're a youngster. So £2.20 games are less than loose change these days to most. So don't expect poker strategy in these games when it's more likely they're just messing around.. 
  • chillingchilling Member Posts: 3,774
    edited June 2016
    Im thinking multi-tabling can cause some of these problems with bad calls and the like.I cant see how a player can play to their optimum with many tables open.It must lead to missing the table dynamics, with players coming and going.Im interested in why some of whom i know to be the best players on sky get busted early quite often.Taking all the analysis,strategy etc from Graham Carters ukpc thread, how is it possible to apply his thoughts to online poker, with far less time to act.I was told multi-tabling allows you to play the better hands, but in Grahams thread good hands are often irrelevant as there are so many other factors to think about.I am talking mtts though.
  • 12811281 Member Posts: 241
    edited June 2016
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes:
    Im thinking multi-tabling can cause some of these problems with bad calls and the like.I cant see how a player can play to their optimum with many tables open.It must lead to missing the table dynamics, with players coming and going.Im interested in why some of whom i know to be the best players on sky get busted early quite often.Taking all the analysis,strategy etc from Graham Carters ukpc thread, how is it possible to apply his thoughts to online poker, with far less time to act.I was told multi-tabling allows you to play the better hands, but in Grahams thread good hands are often irrelevant as there are so many other factors to think about.I am talking mtts though.
    Posted by chilling
    QQ vs limped 1010 and the limp was intended to trap as he'd done it 99.9% of the hands he played for the 2+ hours I was sat with him. 2's my limit by the way, tried 3 and couldn't cope. 
  • chillingchilling Member Posts: 3,774
    edited June 2016
    I meant you could get bad calls and play from players who have too many tables open and cant cope, as you have already stated.Although to this specific hand it may not apply.You will never know how many tables your opponents have open as they include other sites.
  • 12811281 Member Posts: 241
    edited June 2016
    In Response to Re: Micro Stakes:
    Im thinking multi-tabling can cause some of these problems with bad calls and the like.I cant see how a player can play to their optimum with many tables open.It must lead to missing the table dynamics, with players coming and going.Im interested in why some of whom i know to be the best players on sky get busted early quite often.Taking all the analysis,strategy etc from Graham Carters ukpc thread, how is it possible to apply his thoughts to online poker, with far less time to act.I was told multi-tabling allows you to play the better hands, but in Grahams thread good hands are often irrelevant as there are so many other factors to think about.I am talking mtts though.
    Posted by chilling
    QQ vs limped 1010 and the limp was intended to trap as he'd done it 99.9% of the hands he played for the 2+ hours I was sat with him. 2's my limit by the way, tried 3 and couldn't cope. 
Sign In or Register to comment.